Evaluating Martial Arts

in martial-arts •  9 years ago  (edited)

It is fascinating how people never really stop comparing things. Naturally, they also compare martial arts. But sometimes the comparison doesn’t really make any sense. Reaching wrong conclusions can actually be somehow dangerous. Let me explain why.

The Purpose of Martial Arts

Throughout the history of mankind martial arts have been used to protect one’s life, family, community or nation. Or at least that is what the warriors were doing — protecting what was dear to them.

This sounds very knightly, but honestly, it was about killing the other guy as efficiently as possible. You were training to survive.

However, during the times of peace, people started discovering that there are other dimensions hidden under the surface. It is not just about fighting and killing. Deep wisdom can emerge when following the path of a warrior. It can become your path to enlightenment.

The Soldier, the Warrior and the Sportsman

As apparent, martial arts can be used for a wide variety of things. It all depends on the purpose. Simplifying the matter somehow, we could say that there are three main categories of martial arts according to the main purpose:

  1. Martial system. The point of a martial system is to teach people to defend themselves in various threatening situations and to teach them quickly. We don’t have years for that. There are various systems out there, both for professional soldiers and for public audience. Musado and Krav Maga fit into this category.
  2. Martial sport. The motivation when doing a martial sport is not really to be able to defend yourself properly, but rather to win the competition or just to have fun and get fit. This is very different from fighting on the street since there are usually some rules that dictate what is allowed and what is not. Judo, Karate and Taekwon-Do can be mentioned here.
  3. Martial art. Practicing a martial art is about personal development, spirituality and deep studies of the art including broader context. People often end up living the martial art, accepting it as their way of life. Bujinkan Budo Taijutsu and Jiu-Jitsu belong into this category.

It must be noted, though, that when evaluating a system you will sparsely reach the conclusion that the system fits into just one category clearly. Taking Karate as an example, there are competitions being organised for the masses, but historically speaking it must be counted as a martial art as well.

Understand the Purpose

Why am I even making effort to make the distinction? It is actually for people not to have unreasonable expectations. It is for the martial arts teachers to themselves understand what they are teaching.

Getting ready for a competition is way different from learning how to protect yourself when attacked on the street. You can be a gold medal sportsman, but when paralysed by fear, even a technically far inferior fighter can take you down without any major issues. And be sure that you will freeze unless you are prepared.

So, please understand what you are doing. If you want to be able to protect yourself, practice for that purpose. You see, there is no shame really in getting punched in the face on the street. Your teacher just probably didn’t know that they need to prepare you for that. But then again, in case you are doing a traditional martial art, this may not even be the purpose of your training.

Coming back to the original topic, it should be clear by now that it is completely meaningless to compare systems fitting into different categories. And no category is really better than any other category. Let me say it again: it all depends on the purpose.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  8 years ago (edited)

" it was about killing the other guy as efficiently as possible"

I noticed your thoughts on martial sport seem that they might exclude the sentiment I copy/pasted (forgive me if I'm misinterpreting you) and I had some interesting thoughts.

When I first started kickboxing I had a decent amount TKD and savate experience. I spoke with my trainer about what I needed to do to succeed in the ring, and his response was that I needed to get more malicious. I needed to be less worried about landing lots of strikes (I had a very point oriented style) and more worried about my strikes doing significant damage. I needed to get more malicious, I needed to fight like I was trying to kill.

I think this makes sense, because if your opponent is fighting harder than you, and is trying to inflict more and worse damage than you, they have an advantage. It's almost like mutually assured destruction; the only way to make sure that there's no advantage on either side, in that way at least, is for both combatants to go as if they're fighting for their lives.

Would you say that integrates the philosophy you mentioned, or is it a subset, or something else entirely?

Very nice read!

I spoke with my trainer about what I needed to do to succeed in the ring

That pretty much nails it. Martial sports are about succeeding, not surviving. I don't mean that martial sports can't get bloody and ferocious, but really, you need to score points. There is this something pushing you to fight, to attack, to win. In reality there is no victory other than survival. The mentality is just so much different. Imagine trying to score points against a guy standing against you calm and cold with his katana drawn out :-)

Having said that, there is naturally a huge overlap between everything that I've mentioned. It is all "martial". I only wanted to mention slightly that there are still some differences and that you should practice according to what you want to achieve.

@void I admire the way you organized MA practice in this way. Especially now. You are right, the purpose should define what you study as in form following function.
S/O BBT

I have been training Bujinkan since the mid '80s, so I can attest to living the art and it being a way of life. It never was just about fighting (especially for me) and now that I train often with Hatsumi Sensei, I get this message loud and clear from him as well.

I agree with all 3 points on principle.
However, I would say that Martial Arts encompasses all 3 categories at the same time. The root of it all comes from the literal translation of jujitsu which is "the art of adaptability"

  1. Martial system for self defense. Yes. Almost every combat sport is somewhat useful in some ways, even horseback archery (although it is no longer practical)
  2. Martial sport for fitness and competition. Yes, combat is the ultimate competition, however one must realize there are no rules in self-defense, nor is there a point system. Winning equals coming home that day to feed the cats. There are no trophies for living to fight another day. You simply live to fight another day.
  3. Personal development. No matter what style or school you choose, there is no "wrong answer" in martial arts. If you are challenged beyond your former capabilities, you have 'won'.

My advice: choose a school that matches your personality. Are you a brawler? Boxing and MMA and Karate call you. Do you desire peace and personal development? Qi Jong or Tai Chi.

If you want something that samples every form of martial art, to include Kung Fu, Jujitsu, Qi Jong, knife, gun, sword, stick, healing massage, acupuncture, herbal medicine, and fencing, check out Dan Zan Ryu.