Argument

in math •  7 years ago 

Someone just reminded me of "Can't live with it, can't live without it." Here, we have "-it" and "+it". I'll take 'live' as a function f (x) and then we have 'can't live' as the limit of life (the horizon, life infinitely approaching death). We designate 'can't live' as the limit (of life) L. Then we have |f (x) - L| < it, where 'it' is the epsilon, from the "epsilon, delta condition of limits" (where delta depends on epsilon, 'it'). If we retranslate back into English, where 'it' is 'sex', we get: the distance between life and death is smaller (less important?) than sex. Or sex is bigger than any thing that brings you closer to death. Therefore, risking your life to have sex is a mathematical necessity.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations @k-mann! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 1 year!

Click here to view your Board

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @k-mann! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!