Meandering Musing: Safe Spaces

in meandering •  6 years ago 

hippo895963_1920.jpg

So, here’s another ill-advised topic. Safe spaces. Perhaps that should replace the name for this pseudo-series? An Ill-Advised Discussion? Eh. I don’t know, but that’s already starting to get off topic.

Safe spaces are overtly a political left thing, and a rather radical one at that. It is the insinuation that there must be protected spaces where people’s positions aren’t challenged, where they are allowed to feel “safe”. This is heavily tied in with identity politics, usually citing how lgbt and minority groups are especially at risk… somehow. It’s honestly rather silly to think about, as the places these Safe Spaces are advocated for in places meant for higher learning. It doesn’t take a genius to understand the inherent conflict of interest when establishing a lack of discussion in a sphere meant solely for discussion of higher abstract concepts.

In that context, I think there is no substantial defense that can be made for Safe Spaces. They are inherently foolish and self defeating. But what about in another context?

I see a serious problem growing in many spheres of society. Everything is being connected to politics, even when it doesn’t fit. Video games can be political, but most aren’t. Movies can be political, but most aren’t. I could go on. But the most important thing, I believe, is just private relationships becoming political.

We have this real disgusting guilt by association occurring, where if someone has fringe political views, you can’t associate with them. They must be excluded from polite company, under threat of extending that social isolation to their associates. This gets really bad when people also insist on dragging politics into everything, as it is rare for anyone to only speak with people who agree with them politically. I see people ejecting friends and family from their lives simply because of political disagreements, and that strikes me as both petty and evidence of extreme immaturity.

Could we all agree on something? We don’t need to agree on everything politically. But we do need to have spaces where we set aside these political differences. We need to be able to interact with each other, especially close friends and family, without constantly dredging up political topics just to engage in fruitless debate that ends with both sides hating each other a little more.

This is the proper implementation of the Safe Space, in a way that would actually benefit society. At least, that’s my thoughts… I’m curious to hear what others might think.


This Post on Minds

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Do you expect anything less from the populace in general, not even the majority populace as the minority mindset rules. If there was any interest in learning what is right or best for all then there would be more listening and actual communication. I just tend to hear a lot of us,we,me,them this all becomes me, me, me - Needy baby greedy baby and this confuckulated behaviour continues until I am dead or in jail for stabbing some whiney little fucker that is yammering on about things that have almost no value to his existence.

** edit - I just realised it seems like I am calling you a whiney little fucker. haha priceless.

Oh, don't get me wrong. Still a very big supporter of free speech and the public square. By all means, let's allow people to duke it out(metaphorically, with words and ideas) to their hearts content. My main point is that we would benefit from having some areas of public discourse where we don't argue over politics, religion, whatever, and generally get along.

So, please don't stab me. (LOL :P)

Definitely :)
caution-do-not-drink-this-water-urinal.jpg

Talking about safe spaces is necessary when talking about more emotional than rational issues. Of course, if you talk to family and friends there is always some emotionality, although politics is another issue.

The left has political opinions based on emotion, that's why they look for safe spaces, and for that reason any discussion with them is useless.

The dialogue is undoubtedly better when emotions come into play.

Exactly, especially when it comes to family, it can be more beneficial to just make people feel heard and accepted than it is to be right on something. That's one of those spaces that should protected, but I've already seen too much of people distancing from family just because of a disagreement.

Additionally, I think public spaces where we set aside things like political differences can help us maintain societal cohesion. This isn't a "let's just all get along" kind of thing, since we still need to discuss these issues... it's more of a "let's not drag argumentation into every sphere of life" kind of thing.