A few weeks ago we shared Passover with a friend who is an audio / video expert. He installs home theaters for millionaires and prestigious businesses.
He told us something a little shocking: within just a few years there will be no more DVDs or CDs. EVERYTHING will stream. You won't be able to own any media (at least you won’t be able to purchase any new media). Again, in case you missed it: EVERYTHING will stream; NOTHING will be on container medium you can physically possess.
"Cool," you may say, "I would rather stream my media anyway. Who wants to mess with all those dusty old cases and disks?"
OK, OK, I get it. Streaming is easier. Streaming is sexier. But there's a problem with streaming. You can only stream what is streaming. In case you don't know it, and as I referred to in mentioning George Soros owning a share of Netflix, an elite group of billionaires have an agenda to craft public opinion and even alter human existence long-term. In order to do that, they purchase and control very large media corporations (http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6).
Controlling public opinion has long been a feature of elite control. In America this strategy crystallized some time ago when, in the early nineteen hundreds, JP Morgan and some others strategically purchased some of the largest newspapers in the country so they could control public opinion. Regarding streaming: is it clear how owning media companies who stream content could make it possible to easily censor and filter that content with the intention of crafting opinions and engineer culture?
Do you need a few examples of great stories that have been removed from easy access via streaming? One example is the movie Greendcard. It's a romantic comedy I happen to very much enjoy. I miss seeing it on Netflix and other streaming media. Why would social engineers memory hole a seemingly harmless romantic comedy? In this case, they might because a significant element of the story in the film reminds people that, very very recently, immigrants had a difficult time remaining in the US if they didn’t meet the legal requirements.
Another film we don't see offered much these days is The Manchurian Candidate, which portrays a group of young men who, while in the military, were mind-controlled to support their mutually mind-controlled peer whose mother has determined and arranged for him to become POTUS in order to further a bought-and-paid-for MIC agenda (or, in the case of the original film with Frank Sinatra, a Communist Chinese agenda). In watching that film somebody might figure out that there are those who sell the US to the highest bidder, which might in turn interfere with the agendas of those who are in the process of selling the US to the highest bidder.
There are a lot of films that can help people become aware that things may not be as they ought in our troubled world and times. I’ve noticed that since George Soros upped his Netflix share, far fewer of them seem to be streaming on Netflix.
Again: if all media streams and you can't keep your own stand-alone media, social engineers can make ANY bit of film or music they find inconvenient disappear. It’s like a reincarnation of the JP Morgan purchase of media (http://investmentwatchblog.com/congressional-record-from-1917-on-how-government-and-jp-morgan-appropriated-the-media/) to craft and engineer opinion and society in order to perpetuate our slavish obedience in a caste / feudal system all over again. We may only know what they choose to tell us.
Generations to come might never hear the Beatles sing Revolution or Bob Dylan sing that the answer to how many times the cannonballs fire before they are forever banned is Blowin' in the Wind. You might never — ever — see the film Gaslight, Branded, or The Matrix again, and your children might never see them for the first time.