Yes, I agree. And I would even go to 2%, or maybe let the publisher decide with a slider. To me that seems the best solution.
Then the Steemians who want it to be a market decided thing will be happy. And the producers who want to decide what they want to reward their customers/curators with are happy.
Everybody happy and in the long run it will become clear what works better. As it will move into a certain direction.
IDK... it encourages curation; but there is much more work involved in thinking of a post. I think its more fair at 25% curation
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, I agree. And I would even go to 2%, or maybe let the publisher decide with a slider. To me that seems the best solution.
Then the Steemians who want it to be a market decided thing will be happy. And the producers who want to decide what they want to reward their customers/curators with are happy.
Everybody happy and in the long run it will become clear what works better. As it will move into a certain direction.
So I'd prefer a payout split slider solution.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit