RE: Swamp Party w/ Killary Clinton, Bubba Bill, & Sen Bernie Sanders AKA "This Old Man"

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Swamp Party w/ Killary Clinton, Bubba Bill, & Sen Bernie Sanders AKA "This Old Man"

in memeitlol •  7 years ago  (edited)

When those five kids were exonerated, by fucking DNA evidence, Trump still refused to admit he was wrong.

I really wish you had seen my original reply. That was one of the things that you opened my eyes to

He refuses to ever admit he was wrong, and very rarely apologizes when it is obvious that he has falsely attacked and slandered people.

This is definitely something that we can agree on.

Robert Byrd earned a lifetime NAACP score of 82%. They calculate that score based on how you vote on civil rights issues.

I already know you're going to call me an uncle tom for this but fuck the NAACP, in the past they were legit, but today they promote race bating, and furthering the racial divide more than anything. Still though 82% is impressive, maybe I'm wrong about him. I'll have to look into that. I was trying to find this video that earlier that showed other things that he did that that don't go in line with his appologies but i cant seem to find it. I never actually got a change to fact check all of it and I don't want to jump to the conclusion that youtube deleted it, but they have been doing quite a bit of that lately.

That's the way people who aren't racists act in that kind of situation.

Lol I remember when that question was asked. I will also agree here that he probably should have had his mic cut off right away but only because that looked horrible as a first question. The guy who asked the question though is not 100% incorrect... If I told you that I had been recruited by someone who thought i'd actually go to an event would that change your mind at all.

Regardless though I have 2 things to say here when people say that you cant be racist against Muslims because it's not a race they are being completely accurate. Now can you still be prejudice against them sure, but its not racism. Which IMO the reason people blow up about racism more so than any other kind of prejudice is because race is something determined at birth that cannot be changed, and has no effect on your core values. While religion is something that dictates your core belief set entirely. Nobody on the left seems to have any problem with those who vehemently hate Christians. Only Muslims. Even those who hate Judaism are given a pass as long as they only hate the Jewish religion and not the Jews as a race. Muslims though the left treats totally different, even though many of them openly hate everything about western culture. This does become problematic because not everybody agrees with their religions set of values to the same degree, and so for that reason I believe that we shouldn't jump to conclusions when talking about individual people, but in regards to the religion/culture itself there is no problem with being vehemently opposed to it. This is no different to how Atheists can be vehemently opposed to all forms of religion but can still be best friends with a bunch of Catholics, Jews, Muslims and Protestants.

The problem between the Muslim culture and Western culture comes directly from the fact that the west was formed by Judeo-Christian values that are at complete odds with Muslim values. Nobody has any problem with Muslims coming over here who understand that the cultures are different and still choose to come here and assimilate into our culture. What we don't want really has nothing to do with being Muslim. We don't want people with a core belief set that doesn't agree with ours coming here and violently changing things as they are attempting to do currently in Europe. Theres also another factor at play her as well that very few realize even though it was literally told to us by the horses mouth openly back in the 80s


I may upload the full lecture to my Dlive later today as i've uploaded his first interview #illegallyLOL

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

There is a popular myth among right-wing conspiracy theorists that liberals have double standards when it comes to Christians and Muslims. Watch Bill Maher or Christopher Hitchens rip into Muslims the way you would expect Rush Limbaugh to, and you may change your mind.
Liberals are more tolerant of other cultures because we go to college and live in cities, where we are exposed to folks different than ourselves. In doing this, we discover our common humanity, and shatter the myth that we are supposed to hate each other. I have friends of many different beliefs, including Muslims. None of them have ever given me reason to believe our cultures are incompatible. It is also worth pointing out that claims of cultural incompatibility were used as an excuse to segregate and oppress black Americans during the reconstruction and Jim Crow years.
The video of the racist islamophobes talking to Trump and McCain about Obama is more about Obama than Islam. If you are wondering if those folks were being racist, just ask yourself if they would have been flinging these ridiculous accusations at a white President. The only reason President Obama had to endure these ignorant personal attacks is because he had brown skin and an unusual name.

Its like your reading the first sentence every time and then replying based solely on that.

...race is something determined at birth that cannot be changed, and has no effect on your core values. While religion is something that dictates your core belief set entirely.

Nobody has any problem with Muslims coming over here who understand that the cultures are different and still choose to come here and assimilate into our culture

What we don't want really has nothing to do with being Muslim. We don't want people with a core belief set that doesn't agree with ours coming here and violently changing things

This does become problematic because not everybody agrees with their religions set of values to the same degree, and so for that reason I believe that we shouldn't jump to conclusions when talking about individual people, but in regards to the religion/culture itself there is no problem with being vehemently opposed to it.

Did you not read any of that? I grew up in a coastal border city in southern california. One of the most diverse cities in the country I have friends of all cultures, races, religion, ethnicities. The difference between those people and the muslim refugees is that the people we know wanted to come here(that or their parents). The refugees don't, they only want to escape conflict zones, so they do not respect our cultural values. Have you not heard about any of the bullshit that is happening in Europe right now, and has been for the past 5 years since they started bringing Muslim refugees over in droves?

If you cant agree with me that a culture based on religion, which is literally defined as, "a particular system of faith and worship". with system being defined as,"a set of principles or procedures according to which something is done; an organized scheme or method". Can potentially be incompatible with another culture then you're seriously lost and there is no use talking anymore.

How can you say with a straight face, that bringing on hundreds of thousands of refugees who believe its totally fine to have sex with a 13 year old is not going to present conflict. A culture where the father has complete say over whether or not that 13 year old can or cannot have sex with adult men. A culture where women are not allowed to drive without their husbands A culture where women are still forced to wear hijab. Sure there are people fighting these things in their countries, but that is all apart of why their countries are war torn. Until we can agree on certain basic principles we are not compatible en mass plain and simple.

on a somewhat related tangent, have you heard about what happened to Tommy Robinson?

Have you heard about what happened to Roseanne Barr? Have you heard that Trump is defending her? Are you surprised that Trump is defending a woman who was just fired for making racist comments? Should you be?

You're literally retarded. What did Roseanne say that is racist? She factually accused Soros of selling out other Jews during WWII.

The only thing that she was wrong about was that he wasn't an SS and was only an Nazi Collaborator.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/05/30/unpacking-the-george-soros-was-a-jew-killing-nazi-conspiracy-theory-that-roseanne-barr-spreads/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.afd4ce673a58

Oh wait nvm i totally forgot about the planet of the apes tweet LOL. Shes dumb, and like everyone one else tried to blame her shit on something that doesnt exist. She should have just stuck to, yeah i said some dumb shit but ya'll know I'm not racist. I don't know her history very well so I cant say for sure, but she claims to have a good civil rights track record and I don't think I've ever heard of her being accused of Racist. Id also like to add that I really don't care about insensitive jokes(although hers were a bit far). I grew up in places like making them myself. Its definitely not tactful, or something that i think one should do everyday though

http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/30/media/president-trump-roseanne-barr-bob-iger/index.html?iid=EL

As far as Trump goes, its not like he applauded her for those remarks. He defended her because she routinely defends him on twitter.

The fact stands. He defended a woman that just got fired for racist tweets. How many ways does Trump have to act like a racist before you allow yourself to see it? Do I need to do a little research and make a longer list, or should I just wait a few days for him to do it again?

*hella edited no idea how that came out the way it did(best assumption is being half asleep combined with having multiple windows open in edit mode?)

Fine I concede. Lets call Trump a Racist, I see him more a relic of he the past who very often sticks his foot in his mouth but you're right he does it so consistently that Its hard to defend. Its not that I don't see these idiotic things that Trump does. I see the response just as troubling, if not more. Your last list had maybe 5 or 6 examples that may have been attributed to racism, yet everytime he opens his mouth, even when it has nothing to due with race the left tries to divide the country even more by making it about race. The "Animals" comment is a perfect example of this. Trump was specifically talking about a gang that is known for committing insanely brutal animalistic acts; raping and cutting off the heads of underage girls then displaying both the head and the body for all to see, Stabbing unarmed people hundreds of times over a tiny argument. Killing entire families because of the acts of one person.

On the subject of shithole countries race was never mentioned by trump. It was mentioned by his critiques who intentionally distort his words in an attempt to furtherthe racial divide in the US. On the Charlottesville Rally, he literally said the exact opposite of what all of the left learning media outlets say he said, yet they continue to push this rhetoric. That is 100x more troubling to me than a 70 year old president who says dumb shit.

You don't want to believe it, but Muslim culture is not meshing well with western culture in Europe. Because of the exact reasons that I mentioned earlier. Nobody is saying(well nobody that I approve of is saying) that it has anything to do with race, it comes down to cultural values due to circumstance & religion

On borders, what the fuck is wrong with having borders? We cant afford to help out out people from our own country, we don't need to be taking on massive amounts of any immigrants legal or not until we get our existing ducks in order.

Thanks for having the intellectual honesty to be able to admit to something obvious when presented with facts and evidence. This may actually be the first time I have ever encountered that sort of behavior in a Trump apologist before.

Take a minute to consider what a moronic statement "the left is trying to divide the country" is. Who exactly is "the left" anyway? Is it just anybody that doesn't agree with you, or is it a certain percentage of the population? Sounds like a pretty divisive label to me.

If you would read a history book, you would know that millions of people have been called "animals" or some other dehumanizing thing, right before they are murdered or enslaved. I actually got first hand experience with this in the army. The enemy is referred to as some type of vermin or animal, in order to shed the emotional baggage that comes with doing what they do to people. The racist border agent that pulls a crying baby from her mother's arms can sleep easier, knowing that he was just handling animals, and no "real" people were hurt. If you think this shit doesn't happen every fucking day, in every corner of the world, you are either ignorant or naive.

If you can admit the President is racist, perhaps you can admit his policies are racist. It is only logical to deduce that a racist President would enact racist policies, isn't it?

Saying that he is a relic, or giving him a pass on being a racist because he is old, is unacceptable. This man has been given power that could make or break the future of this country for generations, he should be held to a higher standard. At the end of the day, the whole age/relic defense is just an admission that these ideas are outdated and backwards.

I don't live in Europe, so I only see what Guardian, BBC, Der Spiel, and a few others give me. I have met dozens of Muslims in America, and I "mesh" with them just as well as I "mesh" with Christians or atheists. All the mass shootings in America are being perpetrated by white Christians, but nobody is making the ridiculous claim that their demographic is somehow incompatible with all others. Most people, regardless of race or religion, want peace and prosperity.

There's nothing wrong with having intelligently secured borders. There's nothing wrong with having a fair and efficient system to allow people to immigrate. We have never had these things, because white politicians don't give a shit about Mexicans. That has never changed, and it certainly isn't going to change under this racist administration.

Did you even read the article you linked? You posted this response pretty fast, and you obviously didn't read it. If you would have bothered to get all the way to the bottom of the article, you would have seen that Politifact judged Newsweek's statement that the majority of mass shootings are carried out by white men as being "mostly true." Thanks for posting links that support my argument. Next time you should try reading them first, if you want to avoid looking foolish.

He was literally talking about a gang that is known for animalistic violence

And saying that just because one is racist does not mean that his policies are racist. That would be like saying because on is Christian that their policies have to be Christian

You don't have to live in Europe to know whats going on. I knew all about the bullshit in Europe years before any of the news outlets were reporting on it because i had tons of outspoken European friends on facebook.

Nobody sane has a problem with Muslims who choose to come here as the people who you met have. The problem is with shipping over hundreds of thousands of them who don't really want to be here. The People that you have come into contact with understand that there are cultural differences and even if they do not wish to assimilate into American culture they respect it, otherwise they would not have chose to come here. Also would add that I come from a city with a large demographic of 2nd and 3rd generation Muslims, I would say that when they choose to come here they tend to assimilate faster than other cultures actually, and very commonly let down their family because they refuse to keep up tradition.

sorry but the notion that mass shootings are a white phenomenon is false. Sure whites make up the largest number of shooters but they also make up most of the population. Some sources cite that whites are close to becoming a minority but all that means is that they are below 51% of the population. in 2014 they were 60% of the population

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/oct/06/newsweek/are-white-males-responsible-more-mass-shootings-an/