The name is correct. To evaluate the status of history, first of all want to understand how to evaluate the historical status.
No matter if you are Chinese or foreign, there is always a similar kind of deed, such as Reinkel who once again flirted with Messi’s strong personal ability. Then somebody will say “Let's wait until he takes the World Cup and say it again!” - This is how the individual ability to lift the bar is no different from the World Cup relationship.
The player's personal ability does not mean that the player's influence - such as Makelele's dribbling certainly not as good as Savio, but most of the role.
The player's personal ability does not mean that the player's historical position - Do not believe that the return of Cavani in 2018 to the 1960s will surely kill the Quartet. Will this make him historically superior to Gerd Müller?
Speaking a little bit, we all know that football is an important part of the world, and it is better than today. It makes no sense from a competitive point of view. Two years ago I asked Mateus the question. The old man who had won the World Cup with the World Cup admitted that he calmly admitted that the current level of football is indeed higher. The original words are:
"I played 3 km more per game than Beckenbauer and Kroos now runs 3 km more per game than I did at the moment!"
We must calmly say: Messi and Milo, on individual ability, is the best player in the history of football. Messi is probably the best ball player in history. Ronaldo is basically the best in history. Ball players.
Passing them back to the World Cup in 1954, they absolutely frightened Puskas and Schiller to death, like seeing aliens.
But this does not mean that they are more likely to occupy the historical rankings. As stated above: Cavani must be better than Francesco Fork when he crossed back to the 1980s, but it does not mean that he has surpassed Francisco’s historical position in Uruguay. .
Therefore, I think that comparing history, only to see hard honor, in the case of hard honors and doping, doping on the addition of personal technology.
Messi and Jurassic are unprecedented hardware balls. Afterwards are Cruyff, Platini, Van Basten, Di Stefano, Beckenbauer, and aliens.
Champions League, Ronaldo 5, Messi 4.
League, Ronaldo 5, Messi 9.
The details of the various colors of the two people are not mentioned. Anyway, they are historical levels.
Just looking at the club level, the two of them said that it was not an exaggeration before history.
But the problem is that football is more than a club level.
Take two sets of examples.
Di Stefano: He has five gold medals in the UEFA Champions League, so there must be him in all history rankings, but none are top - few people put him higher than Maradona on the club point of view, Maradona and Not as good as him, and no golden ball?
Because of the World Cup, but also because Maradona's own personal skills reputation is too great.
The aliens only have two Golden Globes, not as Van Basten and more club honors. But generally, Van Basten’s assessment is not as high as that of aliens.
Because of the World Cup, but also because of the alien's reputation for individual skills when young.
To put it another way, in fact, in terms of honors and figures, Cristiano Ronaldo is not inferior to Messi. Why do you say that Messi’s history will be even more in the South American media? Because of the personal reputation of this stuff, it makes sense. This is especially true for old names.
For example, Zidane is not scary, but his reputation for high reputation, in addition to team honor, is his individual skills. In his last few years in Real Madrid, he was honored, but the love he got was simply ridiculous, basically coming from his praise for his skills and realm.
The same applies to the two technologists Cruyff and Beckenbauer in the 1970s.
What I usually meet in Europe, at least in the English, French and Spanish media, is that many of them recognized Messi's status as the first person in history, but it is not so stable. He needs a World Cup. If he does not have a World Cup, he will continue to play for the rest of the game. By the time he retire, he will still be regarded as the king by many people. He will only be used in conjunction with Pelé and Maradona to move out of the crowd.
Milo's honor has even caught up with Messi, but he is somewhat restricted by Van Basten's feeling that the aliens are: individual skills are not so epoch-making, so when everyone praises him, they still talk about honors. It’s snobbish, but if he can’t win a World Cup, he may also be the best in history; but if not, the bottom line is that he’s already the strongest attacker in European history and can even be considered the best forward in European history. .
That is, if they were to retire now, they were all historically great. They talked with Pele MacLeuven Beckenbauer about laughing and laughing. They were higher than Di Stefano, Zidane and the aliens. The old ones (off-topics), when Iniesta was to withdraw, Spanish media tried to talk about Harvey, Iniesta and Zidane which are even greater, Spanish media is also very picky... ...). Only the specific ones who are tall and low are not so popular.
But if either of them takes a World Cup, Messi has the opportunity to pressure Beima. Cristiano Ronaldo may become a king of history, and even King of history. In this regard alone, history is even more critical to the Jurassic Party, because the old names are more concerned about the individual (ball) technique when they discuss the matter. Therefore, he must climb to the top and be a little harder than Messi's honor.