Miller vs. USA and the ban of guns.

in miller •  8 months ago 

image.png

I've gotta credit Andrew Branca with pointing this out and fucking my brain for a moment.

In the 1938 case of Miller vs. USA, the case was about the possession of a sawed off shotgun. The case made again Miller was that such a firearm had no practical use, and no military use, and -- therefore -- should be banned.

Now, is it's the guns that do have practical, militarily functions, that these freaking people want to ban.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!