Let's go through a little recap of some major events that have helped shape what we (don't) see today:
Way back in the start it was “the rigged block producing” game, many don’t know anything or much about it, but as many describe it ‘Dam Larimer rigged the game by not making it a fair and equal playing field….’
So not to go into too much detail, it started off with a “BANG” (a shot to the foot).
Then as things started changing and Dan was not on the Steem scene, we saw EOS pop up, after which numerous then top20 witnesses (some still today) run over to EOS and spend endless hours of hard work to help build EOS, while Steem was promoting Smart Media Tokens “SMTs” which were promised by the end of 2017, then again in 2018 and here we are today, with SMTs on the list of things that are coming in 2020.
Unfortunately, we saw “money talks” in action and yes, no matter what anyone says, I stand to be corrected:
“If the same amount of hours put into EOS in 2017 and 2018 by those top20 Steem witnesses were to have been invested in making Steem great and not into making EOS great, many things here on Steem would be different!”
Then let’s go back to the event that shook the world and brought about changes that are still rocking our scene today.
As was perfectly described by a fellow Steemian during a discussion on the topic;
“…they held a gun to his head, it didn’t have bullets in it, it was unloaded, but I see your point, armed robbery is armed robbery, no matter if the gun is loaded or not, the fear is there as the victim doesn’t know if the gun s loaded or not…..”
Although this was more so a case of something that in the real world might not be “robbery”, but it sure did get people doing things that were not in the plans. We saw all sorts of weird and wonderful changes occur, from forks named “sidechains” to some totally new people getting positions and who were never a part of the private company at question, to Ned Scott, kinda not being seen or heard of again.
Makes one think, doesn’t it!
Since then, we have seen other great and miraculous things happen, such as a flip on the support for services that put a constant demand on Steem. Yes there was damn good reasons for it. Yes, I am talking about “bid bots” (as most referred to them).
The irony is that many of those now against bid bots, were those running them. The same people who refused to burn the SBD when converting to Steem (via the exchange option in our Steem code), so as to not put so much pressure on the ecosystem in which the quantity of SBD is reduced and the backing of it with Steem can be ensured (as per our economy).
All about the same time when some stake holders maybe put an ultimatum out to these decision makers, not necessarily the same as the “unloaded gun” scenario, this time, it was definitely loaded. However, with that came “the crab bucket” portion of our Steem Whitepaper. Yes, it came into full force.
Instead of spreading the wealth, we saw the exact opposite.
Which we are seeing abused today in full force by so many, since the introduction of “FREE downvotes”.
Now some may disagree, that is fine, all the power to you, ‘everyone has an opinion’ as the old saying goes. Yet, I am not expressing an ‘opinion’ above, I am merely recalling on factual events that are now historical, “can’t change the past’ as I often say!
So, the point to this is where I finish of this little saying about “the past”.
“Yesterday is in the past, can’t change the past, it is what I do today that can make a difference.”
Looking back, I see many things that still need addressing, all sorts of things, from the further decentralization of the governance, to include (but definitely not limited to) a higher participative nature of decision making processes, to ensuring that once people physically die that their witness votes are nulled, all the way to changing that damn ‘crabs in a bucket’ mentality.
Likewise, the “loyalty” to Steem issue is by far the most important and vital issue that still exists and is still “the ball and chain” holding many things back.
What is priority #1 to those calling the shots?
is it Steem or exclusively personal wealth?
Some may argue that it is both in the one and same “motivation”, yet the question then gets put forward by myself, after seeing so much time, effort and outright work into building other things, that put Steem in second, third and even last place at times:
What are your priorities?
Where is Steem on the list of priorites and loyalties, compared to your other businesses that you seem to be putting so much effort into?
These are questions that all Steemians should be asking themselves when making decisions about our government (governance).
No, not all is “gloom and doom”, in fact I see some things that are above and beyond personal greed.
Here comes a quote from a fellow Steemian from Austria:
“Steem will be everything it can be once people stop equating Steemit.com (and Steemit Inc) to Steem”.
(basically those are pretty much his exact words).
This has been buzzing in my head for years now, heard it earlier from others too, yet it was after a discussion with this Steemian that it sank in.
Today we do see many more options out there for Steem, it isn’t all about “Steemit.com”, we are not secluded to blogging and nothing else.
In fact, we are seeing things happen even without SMTs!
Marvellous, fantastic, “you little ripper” as I would say when with those who speak the same dialect of English as me.
So we have moved forwards from the “exclusion” mentality and actually seen the adoption of “inclusion”.
WOW, what a leap, compared to the recap of events that I started with.
Who, why, where, how and WHY?
Well, add to that “priorities” and “loyalties, because we all remember D-Live.
“###########************%%%%%%%%%%’s” that is my opinion of them!
Note: the hidden text is censored so as not to use foul language in public.
So where are we now?
I see that we are moving in the right direction.
That is a lot more than what many could conclude when looking at the past.
Even with all the nooks and crannies, we are definitely getting out of the “subjectiveness” that we fell victim to and moving towards “objectiveness”.
Might not seem that way to some with all the “downvoting” soaps happening and getting all the silly attention that they get, but if you look at where we were and where we are, it is crystal clear that what the future of Steem holds is definitely a lot more than what we see around us today.
If we have managed to cut ourselves loose of the shackles that we put ourselves in by not wanting to allow anything different onto our Steem blockchain, then we are finally free!
The playing field is now open to ideas, opportunity, diversity.
Something that were only words in the past, they are now becoming reality, not necessarily along the path that many would have hoped for, but yes, we are there.
Which brings me to my final statement in this post,
“Are we finally accepting individuals and free thinkers, or are we still listening to those who repeat the same old things, like parrots?”
Or let me word that another way:
“Free thinkers or those that keep pitching the same old free set of steak knives?”
Yours truly,
@jackmiller
It was a control issue mentality which has gone viral with EOS' governance, in my opinion. Still waiting for that shoe to drop when some important transaction is rolled back or some other blockchain etiquette is broken on the EOS chain; bringing on a replay of ETH Classic.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As stated, many of the same people that were (some still are) in our governance, who helped shape what we see here today were making EOS happen, when they were most needed by all of us Steemians.
Can't change the past, it was what it was.
So why would anyone expect anything different anywhere people who think and do things that way at any time in the future?
Sure, we hear words "I love Steem", yet their actions are what proves the insincerity of those words.
Not judging, just stating historical facts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Totally agree. @lukestokes lost my witness support over it. It is my feeling that history will show them to have made the wrong choice.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steem is diversifying in its business without any "new" features.
We have seen many things happen, before we saw any SMTs see the light of day on Github.
So Steem has a lot more potential than what anyone ever realistically could have thought.
Not to mention the sidechains, no matter what anyone may think of the existing ones, the fact is that it works.
Again, proven in practice. Something that many other endeavours out there will never be able to handle.
We long ago beat the hell out of Visa as far as daily transactions go.
That is old news! Yet still very relevant, even if we don't brag about it nowhere near as much as we should!
It is all there, the pieces of the puzzle are al slowly but surely being arranged and very slowly & still somewhat un+surely being put into place.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@taskmaster4450 posted an interesting article which documented the growth of JSON activity on the Chain.
A couple of days ago after making some claims on steem-engine.com it was made all the more evident to me the vast amount of activity on the Chain which has little to do with blogging.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
But then again, as proven many a time, it seems that there are many who believe that everything and everyone has a price!
https://medium.com/@TronFoundation/steemit-joining-tron-ecosystem-6ad66584d0b
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The link seems to be lost to me, behind a login wall.
JSON does have a cost, though, in RCs.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Wise words as always @jackmiller .. some people have been around long enough to see through the bullshit ..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hear ya bro.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Can you please not put these automated comments on my posts.
I am not a fan of "automated comment spam".
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
For a moment, I thought this is owned by you.. @jackmiller 😂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Your blog content idea was originally @jackmiller's so your automation sharing it here is a slap in the face!
Downvoted for stealing another's idea.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit