RE: Self-defeating Beliefs: Tax The Shit Out Of Those Billionaires, But I Want To Be One Of Them!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Self-defeating Beliefs: Tax The Shit Out Of Those Billionaires, But I Want To Be One Of Them!

in money •  8 years ago 

Social programming teaches all kinds of self-contradictory nonsense. The very notion that there is some intrinsic difference between "tax" and "theft" is one of those nonsensical lies. Another lie is that wealth has limitations, that there is only so much to go around.

The state robs us all, first, by effectively filling our heads with such nonsense, and next, by pitting us against one another to protect the "right" of the state to rob us.

The true, ultimate source of wealth is the individual human mind. We transform the virtually limitless resources of the material universe into artifacts that serve us. Properly understood, there is no need for theft if we are not lazy thieves.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Agree with the mind as being the source of our wealth or poverty. Still pondering about the state robing us. If you agree to give it away, then it's not theft, IMHO.

The problem comes when the state takes it at the point of a gun, which is always the end game for them.

IF I "agree to give it away" as you put it, then it is not robbery. Yes, we agree on that, but that is a very big "if."

That is not how the state works, although they may pretend to work that way. For example, in the U.S.A., the federal government tax collectors (IRS, Internal Revenue Service) like to call their taxes "voluntary compliance," one of the most amazing oxymorons in history. The problem is, if you don't volunteer, they send men out with guns to help you "agree to give it away."

And so, if the state were a moral entity, it would simply ask for donations. I have no problem with that; it is called voluntaryism. Sadly, I know of no modern state that practices it.

I think it was Murray Rothbard who asked us to imagine any group of people doing an action that the state does. The immorality of the state action becomes immediately apparent.

Hello, @endlessknot, thanks for weighing in.

Just stopped by your blog, read and voted for your (two) articles, and clicked "Follow." In at least the realm of widely varied interests, I can see that we're kindred spirits. If you want to see a real hodgepodge of eclectic articles, click this GIF: 😄😇😄

@creatr