STEEM WHISTLEBLOWER: Whale Bots Are Devaluing STEEM.
This is a "Calls It As I Sees It" article and in no way should be taken as fact or fiction, merely observations.
A troubling new pattern seems to be emerging on Steemit and the need to address it in a post has finally gotten to the point of making it a reality. With what one could perhaps describe as unintentional or intentional systematic colluded voting on certain accounts producing content that in my opinion is either translated, plagiarized or poorly written. I'm not talking about simple copy and paste jobs either. These seem to look intentional. In most cases images were lifted from multiple sources with no credit given until after someone had mentioned something. We aren't talking posts that made $10 or $100 Steem Backed Dollars here... We are talking THOUSANDS.
More Troubling is the Fact That Whales are Supporting These Posts
I'd first off like to come outright and say in no way is this a witch hunt against any one user and anyone listed in this article as an example is only a suspect in my own mind and unless you agree with my point of view and raising of this whistle blowing then please do not view these users any differently. It IS entirely possible I am wrong in all of this, but until otherwise irrefutable evidence is brought forth by the users given in example here perhaps entertain the possibility of this infact happening on Steemit.
I do not wish to harm anyone's reputation here. This is a thought our community on Steemit.com is having and we need to address it before it becomes a commonplace epidemic. While I am not against whale botting their curation and automating voting from multiple accounts... I DO have a problem with high powered accounts blindly following and upvoting users either because they believe they will do well or seemingly do not understand proper article writing etiquette and refuse to not reward what could be described as "filler" material.
The tipping point for me personally was watching account @mrron make a handful of basically "fluff" articles and receive thousands in Steem Backed Dollars and Steem Power. Now by "fluff" articles I'm not meaning he wrote heartfelt tales nor featured any kitties, puppies or pets. Check out this guys posts..
What part of any of those posts is worth that type of money? Are they inspirational? Has the user given proof he's been there or even actually tasted these things and been these places? Where is the value in their content? Has the user done a verification post? Has the author given proper credits to the images used?
Before we go pumping accounts full of rewards and shares in the future of Steemit. Please consider the above.
I give a list of high value accounts below that seem to upvote this type of crap and make it seemingly acceptable to not only pollute the Steem network, but get paid handsomely as well for doing so:
@berniesanders - @steemed - @itsascam - @complexring - @kushed - @nextgencrypto - @wang - @silversteem - @steemroller - @silver - @justin - @slowwalker - @steemservices - @juneaugoldbuyer - @cyber - @nabilov - @dashpaymag - @charlieshrem
Other users that should be aware of this sort of thing and it's potential to happen:
@dan - @ned - @dantheman - @smooth - @steemit - @stellabelle - @summon @addwhalenamesincommentsofdevelopersandotherwhalesplease<3
If you made the list above do not take it as a personal attack but more of a call to action to make your own decisions rather than having code do high value decision making for you. As much as I promote coding and the automation of menial tasks as we evolve as a human species, some things like curation really shouldn't left to blindly followed rules set by numbers and code. Many of you are fans and supporters of mine and I'd like to address this with you on a public forum so we can speak about it as a community rather than discuss things privately amongst ourselves. This is what blockchain based social media is for, right?!
The users I suspect of gaming the steemit system's latest "masterpiece" you can find here: https://steemit.com/food/@mrron/desi-foods-in-karachi-to-try
Ask yourself for a moment.. What part of that post is worth over +$1000?
Now I do admit that I do at times make posts that have little value besides a doodle and a laugh. When that is the case I tag them accordingly. Certainly I see a time and a place for short little meaningless blurbs for laughs. But when we as a community start shoveling a whole crap ton of money into unverified users, with unproven and unimaginative articles, we're doing it wrong.
Please check your curation bots guys. This is getting a wee bit out of hand!
@mrron give us something to work with here.. A verification when it was hinted at rather than calling me a racist would have been a fair easier way null suspicions.. :/
User @justinlaak has taken it upon himself to flag this post and drop this gem on us:
You don't deserve the reputation you have here @justinlaak if you side with those that wish only to put in little effort. I believe that folks don't often get the recognition they deserve here on steemit.. Then I see posts with next to no meaningful content making thousands of dollars and I think to myself.... "Is this how they envisioned it when they were drawing up the white paper and coding the first versions of Steem?" Low value content being artificially inflated by poorly maintained or thought out automated curation lists is the problem here!
Bonus Journalism! User @cjclaro finds some strange votes on Steemd.com
Not sure who this badger guy is.. But I bet he's got some insight into why them posts got all pumped perhaps?
GOOD FIND @cjclaro - You are an asset to our community sir!
Badger has replied in the comments below, Turns out he is a miner!
Go upvote his comment below please. Both he and I would appreciate it!
Thank you to @dantheman for looking into the issue!
Want more info, humour and tales from @klye !?
in the top right corner.This way you get to see my new posts in your feed tab on your blog when I submit them!
Alternatively if you're a chatter rather than a reader come join me in the klye room.
This is supposed to be a free network, his lack of proving who he is has nothing to do with the fact, every article he has written has trended and do not seem worth a huge following. Doesn't look good.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It is pretty suspicious. Although I'm not going to scream foul play and jam it down people's throats I'm definitely going to raise the issue.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@kyle Thank you for posting this! I was thinking for some time now of being here - what on earth makes an article worth upvoting ? Do we actually have a set standard on what qualifies for a good post and what doesn't. However, if we do - would we still be considered anarchists? so I just went on blogging but it really is frustrating watching my posts get outdone by other post that doesn't seem to have been put much effort on. Sighs and sighs ... Oh well, they say - in every problem there's a solution. I hope they look into this and if not, we just have to keep blogging. Who knows - one day we'll strike a huge luck but if this is what the game here looks like - I wonder again, who would keep on playing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's remarkable to trend with every post . He must do something right
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Right!? Makes me want to use other peoples food images and make up reviews on the food I didn't eat. ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Rofl. Hell we can make up imaginary foods and I can draw them.. We could possibly make a fortune!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm going to be reviewing the McDonalds menu at some point. It's sure to be a hit. I'll do it in an anarchic way and get the screenshots off their website.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hahaa !! Oh well oh well ! Let's wait for the Varification post
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We both know we disagree about this idea of going after users or different kinds of content (and I may have something more to write on the latter because I really believe it is a serious obstacle for Steemit at this point) without any evidence of abuse (though still fair to downvote you really believe the rewards are excessive), but I'm still upvoting for the art.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks smooth.
I'm trying not to completely burn / witchhunt @mrron - I believe he could in the future be a very valuable asset around here.. But the current way they've gone about things is no good and needs to be brought into light.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's no good for the sole reason that you subjectively believe the content is not worth the votes.
Personally, I think it is not a good enough reason because of the subjectivity.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I see what you are both saying though. When compared with some other posts, it seems that most people would feel that those blog posts are not groundbreaking. That's not to say they don't bring value, but in the current state, people take offense if you were to flag/downvote their content. So @klye downvoting may make @mrron mad who has a high reputation now and could (I doubt he will) start flagging @klye.
Everyone is free to do as they wish when it comes to voting, I think @klye is more worried that if this is the type of content that is making thousands of dollars, more and more people will create this type of content (whether that is the intent or not, it's up to the individual user to decide this).
For me personally, if the trending feed was full of articles like those @mrron writes, I would be disappointed. There are some who spend 2 days writing and editing and receive $5 (That's not a complaint, just a reality for some) for their work and may become frustrated see this trend when it appears that it could have been written with not a great amount of editing or anything groundbreaking.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Subjectively or objectively, if there is a reasonable rationale, then that is good enough.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Always loved your art and creativity to represent things. Thanks for sharing your awesome work @klye
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Cheers funnyman. I appreciate you taking the time to read my stuff.
Sadly it's not all fun and bubblegum, But I like to try and report on current things I see around me on Steem.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
While I think that anyone at all, whether gaming or putting sweat equity into producing vote winning posts, ultimately aiming to make a living out of it, is still pulling money out of the Steem market cap. The bots are the most clear example of it.
But look on the bright side. These people can't make money forever gaming the vote system. Sooner or later their costs outnumber their rewards, and then they go away, smugly proud of their raid on the Steem market cap.
At that point they are leaving more than coming, because they successfully, massively deplete the pool for rewards. You might be right for feeling a bit cut over this, because it seems contrary to the rewards system. But they will eventually quit, and the 'pump and dump via voting' process will stop being profitable, and those remaining with big vests in SP will be those who actually are here to make use of the discussion system to help foster a productive development and outreach program, in all kinds of directions, which will ultimately bring in the rewards.
Maybe there is still yet to be another wave of these robo-whales, maybe a couple more. But no marketplace is without the bears, looking to dig in, and skip out with their short sell profits.
They can't take away from the fundamental vests of people who they can't squeeze money out of.
These people will come to be the whales in a shrunken pool of Steem. These people will manually upvote genuine good content, especially when it relates to boosting the investment in the platform. Sure, this will yield a pool that will see more robo-whales show up, but if you are sure about Steem's effective mechanisms, you just hold your steem. I might even say, that it is possible that it could be my nest-egg building up slowly but surely, and in 2 years time, and this thing is still happening, probably my SP will be so big that I can cash a little out and fund non-steem related endeavours, while maintaining my position as a curator.
It's not meant to be a short term gain equation. Those who do this ultimately can only win a little bit out, and most of what they are winning, they are winning by outwitting the other big investors, of which many will also be running bots to game the vote rewards.
That money was never really in the pool in the first place. If you manage to capture a little bit of it, and you are serious about building up Steem, then you also will be able to have more power to flag these assholes later on, destroy their reputation and voting power, and diminish their malign influence.
If this was not tl;dr for you, go check out my post here: https://steemit.com/steemit/@l0k1/the-number-one-guaranteed-way-to-make-money-on-steem Understanding the dynamics of steem's everyone is both shareholder and employee model should show you that, if you really want to make money out of steem, you need to divert a bit of energy from your quality content creation, do outreach work to promote the increased understanding in the community at large about what Steem actually IS, or like me, build the utility of the platform that by itself also will boost userbase and investment.
We are all in this together and when the Robo-Whales have had their way with each other, and inadvertently powered up a lot of serious Steem faithful, the situation will start to move more and more towards a cohesive understanding of how we all can profit from this group enterprise.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is what I have discovered using https://steemd.com/mrron
Multiple account voting for his post with very similar names. I think this has to be checked by Steemit guys upstairs!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Those are all a single account. They were mined and not obtained for free using Facebook. The person who mined them spent a lot of money mining steem power and the account names. You can think of all the accounts that you have pictured as one mini-whale account. You will see more of "us" voting in the future.
I hope you enjoy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@badger311 Cool but be careful, accounts with low or no rep voting too often for a user can cause a post to actually drop off the feeds. I call this "malicious upvoting". It happened to @trogdor recently.
Anyways, if you want to point some of that voting power my way for this post, I'd be much obliged...
https://steemit.com/news/@williambanks/are-you-really-an-anarchist-or-anarcho-capitalist-prepare-to-be-offended
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Can I ask what you saw of so much value in those posts? You have the right to vote on anything, but wondered what specifically drew you in or if this was someone you knew. Why wouldn't you have a single account though. Is it better to have multiples?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I pick topics to upvote because I think they make good topics. Pakistan is a good topic and I like to learn about it.
These accounts are multiple accounts because each account can only be represented once in the mining queue. If you have enough mining power, you may want up to 150 accounts so that you don't run out of accounts to put in the queue and waste mining power.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ah. Cool man! Thank you for joining the conversation.
It is an honour to speak with such a dedicated miner... It did not don on me that someone would be using such a large number of accounts to upvote stuff.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I see. That makes a lot of sense since Pakistan is indeed a unique topic and should lead others to also write about it and expand knowledge of it.
You have enlightened us all thank you for taking the time to do so. I have a totally different perspective of what you are doing now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for that comment.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Technically, having multiple accounts is not a "illegal" here in Steemit. Much like having multiple smartphones is not illegal. Furthermore, it is not a illegal to mobilize these multiple accounts to vote for a post. I just think it's unethical to vote for a post that may have been "plagiarized" and nothing to prove that it was actually the author's work. And I am not only referring to the post in question. I am referring to all posts with the same level of quality and content.
But then again, Steemit is a free community and if we think a post does not deserve the rewards it receives, we can always counter. The thing is, if we are against a whale and as minnows like us, they can just swallow us up and spew and swallow again 100x over.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If I was pulled over here in Canada and I had 20 cell phones they'd either think I was a thief or a drug dealer.
I can see from the miners stand point the benefits of having such a wild amount of accounts..!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You said it yourself...it's suspicious at the most and unethical at the very least. I think having different identities is ilegal in any country of the world.
@smooth has almost 100 different accounts (I got this number directly from him so there's no secret about it). I've jokingly "investigated" them here.
He transfers SP in a cycle, so he gets Steem daily by powering down from many of them. Yes these are the rules of the game, just don't expect zero controversy, questions and doubts.
This and many other issues are evident and not very good for the integrity of the platform. Don't expect companies or smart investors to start throwing big money over here any time soon.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sounds like a conspiracy to me LOL.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Interesting! @klye is this a foaming at the mouth badger?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It may very well be.. I may have to art for a closer look.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
In fact it is only a plethora of friendly badgers on second viewing :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Frothy friendly badgers.. Hawt
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good investigative work here.. We may very well be onto something.
UPVOTE ABOVE POST FOR VISIBILITY PLEASE FOLKS!
(sorry for caps, I didn't mean to yell at you... <3)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Appreciate the shoutout, @kyle. Thanks. I think one issue the Steemit guys upstairs should recognize is the unusual upvotes by an unusual set of users. This could be a serious loophole that might as well be exploited or being exploited right now. This may have been happening in the past unnoticed until it was noticed by your post. I hope we get to the bottom of this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@mrron is on the leaderboard: https://steemit.com/stats/@masteryoda/daily-payouts-leaderboards-august-25
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep. And I'm sorry but with that type of low input material being rewarded so ridiculously it sort of makes you wonder doesn't it?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Is there a way we can verify what time accounts voted for his post(s)? Like what the order of votes was and at what time intervals he was upvoted by whale bots? Particularly his first post before he had any following. Cause if we saw something along the lines of no upvotes then whale comes in at exactly 30 minutes and votes him up then we have pretty good evidence of new account collusion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
user @inertia (I hope this is his tag on steemit, it's his tag on the steemspeak chat) showed me this link, which shows the order upvotes came in. But is there a way to query the blockchain to find out what time/how long after he posted the votes came in? That would be our smoking gun, to see some of these whale accounts upvote him extremely early at set increments
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Click the advanced mode at the top and then you can see voting details. One whale voted after about 35 minutes (this is somewhat expected; if a whale sees a new post without much following they will almost always wait until >30 minutes in order to avoid the early-voter penalty). Several others voted 2-3 hours later.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You can use http://steemd.com I believe to check exact times and do further investigative work.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I wrote a post a while ago called hunting bots with python (and love) which seems pretty good at finding upvote bots. Useful if anyone wants to do research as it includes a link to the python code.
Worth checking out just for the cool @kyle cover art :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Upped because you're a developer and asset to our community.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey @klye, though you were asleep man :) Clearly not :):)
With my pacifist attitude (and modesty :P ) I would say that going this public about the guy's posts is a bit too much but I do understand why you did it.
Nowadays, it does take a solid amount of luck to get recognized that highly and on 100% of your posts. Let me say that again: on 100% of your posts. [suspicious eyes rolling from left to right]
I would definitely like to see some comments from the whales that voted for him and pinky swear they did it from no hidden reason besides that they truly liked his posts and how it made them feel while reading them. Sadly, I don't think that will happen.
If it does though, hats off to them, and best of for the guy as he apparently has a very bright future.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If it is all luck then I'll gladly eat my own sock and shake the guys hand and publically appologize for this post..
But my gut instinct is telling me otherwise... And the real issue at hand is these whales blindly upvoting stuff.. -_-
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You may have made a valid observation here. It is true that in the past before anyone got EVERY one of their posts awarded like this we usually at least saw an introduceyourself with a verification picture. Yet that could be even faked, so would it mean anything. It'd be easy to be fakes with $2000+ in SBD and 1300+ Steem Power.
If that is legit then you and I need to break down his posts and start posting crap like that. The photos were indeed nice, and knowing about other parts of the world is nice. Yet if they were just copy and paste work of someone elses with no credit, then I don't know why these posts would be so lauded compared to many that are not.
Could be just a bot gone mad. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Aye. The real problem here is people voting for the perceived curation rewards and not because they actually read or like the articles.. :/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah for things to work well here people that have high steem power should actually be taking the time to find worthy content. Many of them are. Bots that follow people though I've seen people in the past get $1000 for a image and maybe a paragraph simply because they are followed.
A side effect is that these same people start putting out content way too fast to keep up with in some cases simply because they get a high reward on anything the post.
I also find it kind of Ironic that @berniesanders is at the top of all those posts for voter awarding money, and he is the one that dinged @dollarvigilante for writing something that @berniesanders thought too many people had written similar things before.
I even voted on at least one of those posts. I did think they were vote worthy. Yet to get $1000+ for every single post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I've written about this in this previous controversial post.
Wherever you agree or not for that post or user in particular, I think it's pretty clear the curation reward system is a corrupt one and nothing good comes out of that. People vote mindlessly for whatever makes them money, either via curation rewards or by voting people who attract more people (whales do this constantly). They continue to consistently disregard good or unique content. And that's what basically killing the platform right now.
If Steemit goes to 20 cents, maybe money will be taken out of the equation. But on the other hand, what's the point of it then?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
0.20 cents on Steem is still >> Facebook + Twitter + whatever else combined.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Could be but you can't aim that low if you want a future for the platform. There are a lot of issues not addressed and that's why the price and user activity are free falling. That means less money to develop the system and company. I think some competition will be very good for Steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'd say the point of Steemit long term is education and betterment of mankind through helping common people become greater than they currently are by expressing themselves.
The value of Steem Backed Dollars and Steem aren't the point here really. The point is that we need to be placing our eggs in actual baskets rather than blurby fluff bits!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Spot on. It's viewing the large amount of crap on the trending page that will be a major obstacle to attracting new members. Minnows also get disheartened/jealous when huge amounts are made on these type of posts, while their efforts go unnoticed.
Not everybody has what it takes to provide consistently quality content, so many minnows will not succeed. BUT I have read some of the most amazing articles here and they made 1c. :/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sadly not all the articles that I think deserve a decent chunk of pie for their effort get rewarded justly.
I may actually attempt to run as a witness in the future in an attempt to fix this sort of stuff from happening.
We can change the way the system runs by actively shaping it. I am a firm believer in that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Wow ! This was quite a post ! I obviously miss out on the politics of the platform and thanks for a little insight while I continue creeping in my underground 🙈 with 177 followers and nice comments but never trending once . I continue and try my best to deliver original content . That's all I focus on . Not much interest anymore reading the so called trends . I follow over 350 people I really like and enjoy my daily feeds
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm glad you're enjoying your time on the site. I love it as well.
Steemit is full time work for me these days and I try to report breaking news as it happens!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm already your fan :) glad I got you in my feed
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I try to tell new people to just post what they feel is meaningful. Trying to look for what whales will vote on might benefit someone short term, but if it's not your passion, it won't be fun. If people are not having fu here they miss out on the entire platform. Whatever your passion from knitting to boxing if you love it, chances are you might find someone else who shares an interest or may be interested in learning your craft.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steemit has the first comer advantage. And we are literally all early adopters here.
We shape the past, present and future of the network. Our voice is worth something!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm glad you raised this issue @kyle as I've noticed it as well. Rewarding garbage posts--some of which appear to have been plagiarized or poorly translated via Google--will discourage people from posting. After all, if voting is arbitrary and has little to do with quality, what's the point of going to the trouble of posting our best writing on Steemit? I've seen ridiculous posts drawing in thousands of dollars--and beautifully written and illustrated posts rewarded with nothing more than a few votes and a couple of dollars.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We do need to disperse the power of curation and voting over many different types of users in order to fully succeed as a network. Maybe @mrron goes on to do more great things on this site that are better written and far better suited to the payouts he's receiving. I do wish him luck in the future and I hope he continues to improve both as a writer and as a person. Hopefully this article does not come off as me sounding off to attack the guy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What I worry about is that certain whales will have lots of minnow accounts, upvote them all for crap, then milk steem for all it's worth.
There have also been some high profile bloggers here I've seen that have some really bad articles alongside their good stuff. In bad english. So i think they have hired a writer from Asia for pennies then posted it here knowing that theyll be auto upvoted.
Good investigation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Curation bots only work if you have an actual brain behind the trigger.
Even the best code isn't capable of telling i an article is complete shit or not.. You need to read and understand an article before you can cast proper judgement.. Code can't exactly do that (yet)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
wow, good catch. This isn't good at all :(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Unfortunately it is not. :/
I'll do my best to try and get news and info spread to my fans and followers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Dude, good job on the research and whistle blowing. I have honestly limited my time browsing posts because of this issue, it's sort of depressing to see and discouraging when some of us put our best out there and all we hear are crickets :)
I'm not going to quit over it, but it is, like I said, discouraging and disheartening to see the wealth of the community often times ending up in the crapper.
Now-a-days I pretty much limit all my browsing to those I follow and I'm really picky about who I follow as well.
But I'm really grateful to you and others who are calling this sort of behavior out and helping make positive changes here. I'm trying to focus on just creating, sharing and some browsing/curating of a few...so I know I and others rely on people doing what you've done here.
Namaste brother.
John
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
i like this argument..however, we don't know what mind the whales have, at the end of the day..it's still up to them if an article is worth it or not..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think in this instance a handful of them votes may not have had any human calling the shots whatsoever.
(If post rewards >= X ) {MAKE IT RAIN} <-- not real code... :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Don't blame the whales, this behavior is simply built into the system. Popularity doesn't care about quality. Steemit cares about content which potentially will be popular.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @kyle - I'm a new follower thanks to @stellabelle's post about you. There are plenty of people writing quality content that aren't getting any attention. I agree that whale bots are auto-upvoting fluff material that doesn't merit the money they're making - but I personally cannot focus on that because I've already had the passing thought of 'who do I have to sleep with to get some attention around here?' - and that might upset my husband a bit. LOL
So, I've switched my attention to people.
Automation is a powerful tool. I use it to regurgitate links to past posts on my other social media outlets -- but finding talent, commenting, and yes, upvoting should always ALWAYS have the human touch.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have not yet seen any of this, but thanks for sharing. I will say that upvoting "junk" will only encourage others to put out more junk, so hopefully this is not the case. Either way, thanks for sharing your observation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's one thing to upvote a friends less than spectacular content to give em hope to keep going...
But when you are shoveling thousands of dollars into anonymous accounts that haven't put a whole hell of alot of effort into the post... Raises my eyebrows!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Blind upvoting with bots is the result of bad reward system. Without changing curations rewards algorythm steemit will fail very soon.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It will lead to all sorts of nasty review and devaluement of the Steemit platform if left unattended.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree something needs to be done fast. There has to be a way to stop this. I also think the fee taken in the first 30 minutes shouldn't go to the authors. Just give it back to share holders.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm sure you will get a lot of flack for this but it takes balls to "tell it like it is". I wonder if this post will get anywhere near the earnings the suspicious posts you describe get. Probably not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Messengers are generally pretty low paid in history.
This post wasn't for the money. But to raise the issue I saw.
If I get flack. So be it. Someone needs to help Steemit out!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreed. I don't believe this is the standard that should be set as a highly valued post. It's not terrible, but I also do see the point where it should receive quite as much money as it has.
I don't think this is the case, but I think it is very important to make sure only great content is upvoted. Fuck whose name is on it. Just because it's a whale doesn't mean you should upvote and not read and get your .001 Steem power.
Everyone should have their content looked at before being voted on. To not do so in unfair to both the author and voter. Great content will not likely continue to be created if the precedent is set at a few pictures and a paragraph.
I'm not even jealous that it made a lot. If I thought it deserved it, like your last post @klye then that is a different story. Hopefully in the future more rewards will be given to people who spend more time crafting things that are likely to only be seen on steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nicely said Ben
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Fuck whose name is on it."
I like this sentence. Not because it's vulgar but because it speaks what I feel true.
I appreciate you taking time out of your day to share your feedback and thoughts on the matter.
We are a community. We must be aware as a community in order to fully reach our potential.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I tend to not be extremely vulgar, but there has been a few things today that I've seen that were so selfish that it got to me a bit and @stellabelle breaking loose opened the dam.
I feel that certain language emphasizes points. If you use any word too frequently it loses its meaning, but sometimes adding a four letter word can add to a point. But I feel sometimes people vote on a name before they even read the article. Maybe a time period should be set once you click on an article so people have to stay on an article x number of minutes before they can vote.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree with you there. While I'm not one to promote complete lunacy and potty mouth at all times I do believe as adults on a platform we shouldn't fear using the odd foul word in fear of punishment.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Absolutely. It is funny that there have been no very young people on steemit. I guess since it is not really a kid friendly place that kids might get easily bored because of their instant gratification short attention span. Snapchat and ig do so well because of this I think.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@bendjmiller222 Amen to " but I think it is very important to make sure only great content is upvoted"
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks @englishtchrivy. I don't even believe in always voting on friends work. Sometimes your friends need to be called out when they are not producing the quality of work that you think they should be. I don't want upvotes unless I deserve them. Otherwise I am only hurting steemit long term.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has been linked to from another place on Steem.
About linkback bot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't see what the problem is, mrron's been a lucky contributor to find the votes. Pulling the race card was stupid of him but he doesn't deserve a witchhunt for success. He's not done anything wrong.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Many, many posts on this forum have similar characteristics, including content that might summarize (but not copy) what is written elsewhere, and the window dressing of copyright-free images.
Why haven't these other authors been targeted?
I agree with @mrron that it likely has something to do with his presumed Pakistani heritage. There is a tremendous bias against people from Islamic regions in the media, and consciously or not many people have succumbed to media conditioning and racial bias.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nope. I don't care where he is from.
If you read my post you'd see that @mrron was merely a tipping point. I know there are countless other low value / high payout posts that exist on the site.
I hate no person of any race, religion, sexuality and more or less than any other. That is foolish old fashioned thought and those that fall back on the race card generally don't have an intelligent rebuttal.
It's been HOURS. @mrron could have easily done a doodle and verified himself and turned this entire article into a happy tale with an apology from myself and more upvotes raining on his work... Sadly this is not the case and the whole "klye hates indians and islamic folks" thing simply doesn't hold up here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If he is in Pakistan and you are in Canada there is a 10 hour time difference there.
Seriously, you are claiming he is a scammer because he is asleep? What was that about not caring where someone was from? It clearly does matter to you that he is from a different part of the world.
I had a look at some of his posts. They're blah, but better than the tripe that dollarvigilante and some others post. And don't get me started on the secret-writer stuff - I'm in my 40's and have met a fair range of people and none live lives like that , it's likely all fiction. Just like the series of rape stories we got in June that got investigated and turned out to be completely fake but were upvoted to $$$$$s. On that scale, mrron is fairly harmless and benign.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The point is, we have no idea where this user is from, that they are even real people or anything of the sort.
I get you trying to explain the situation out as you perceive it. That is all this post is for myself at the end of the day.
Seem's the developer of steemit agreed with my whistle. So I'm not sure if I feel like a bad guy here or a needed messenger. :/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I understand why you might think that, but there is absolutely no way this is due to being from Pakistan. Most wouldn't know Mrron from the Moon if it were not for people bringing it up after the fact.
I've been here since July 11th or so, something like that, and I've been fighting this sort of thing since then and I know many others are color-blind when it comes to dealing with stuff like this. Racism? Please.
We can't catch every user doing the same thing, we tend to go after those making the most rewards for obvious reasons.
Anyway, since you obviously know there are many many posts on this forum that have similar characteristics, you must feel that what is being done is ok, right? So there is no excuse for yourself. Saying others do the same thing is no excuse.
I swear, it's the same thing again and again. Users making bad excuses so that people can justify what they know to be improper behavior. Money is that important isn't it?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
i know how its feel,
thanks bro for share this
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Meeee toooo
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks, like your post , follow you now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Flagged. IMO this bullying based on feelings and personal opinion is bad for everyone. Also, I thought to myself, is this worth $42?
If anything, posts like this disguised as service to the Steemit community is what will drive people away. Amateur content with disproportional rewards will make people come in droves. End this kangaroo court - it's an embarrassment!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Is this worth $42?" Says the guy who made thousands of dollars slapping together posts about coffee. The "holier than thou" attitude is completely unjustified.
Personal opinion is bad for everyone? You do realize you are on a blogging site where a large portion of content is written based off of opinion, right? You just started your sentence off with "in my opinion"... So if personal opinions are bad for everyone, don't flag shit based off of your opinion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's worth far more likely.
I'll mention this bit in case you failed to read it in my article:
"I'd first off like to come outright and say in no way is this a witch hunt against any one user and anyone listed in this article as an example is only a suspect in my own mind and unless you agree with my point of view and raising of this whistle blowing then please do not view these users any differently. It IS entirely possible I am wrong in all of this, but until otherwise irrefutable evidence is brought forth by the users given in example here perhaps entertain the possibility of this infact happening on Steemit."
You the owner of all the badger accounts by chance? ;)
I'm not trying to bully anyone here. Don't shoot the messenger.
I ask you politely to unflag my stuff. Standing up for something is one thing but casting hatred on a person trying to raise a very valid concern only serves to damage your reputation as a user on here.
Don't believe me? Keep your flag on this post wrongly. This is all original content. Same cannot be said for the articles in question here.. The community will decide if your flag is rightly placed.. But I personally think you're a wee bit out of line 100% power flagging me. You do risk the reputation of your account "trying to be the rebel" most of the time around here. :/ A 5% flag would have got your point across. As a user with higher reputation you need to act with more than just your emotions sometimes. I wish you success in the future man. Same goes for @mrron to be fair.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
flagged spam
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
this is not spam.. =(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey man we'll get this sorted out. sorry.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
little psy duck forgives you =)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you smooth.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not sure if bot or user... Are you a human or a duck @psyduck ?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
i am psy duck..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ah crap might want to come into https://steemit.chat/channel/steemitabuse-classic and get your account un-nulled. oops!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Uh.. Not sure if the N-word is really necessary..
But if you MUST be racist about it.. Atleast tag it with #imgoingtohellforthis man.. cmon!
Probably #nsfw and #racist too.. -_-
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit