But we are not handicapping top posters. Rather, top posters benefit more in my proposition.
The idea is that top posters do not need to be discovered for curators, thus the work that the curators did is not as valuable. Therefore the poster should get more of the profit. Whereas for an unestablished poster, they would get less profit from each successful post, but they have a higher chance to be discovered because curators now have a better incentive to try and find these hidden posts.
You r right , but i think that how the guys who designed this platform envisaged this platform to be
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh, I've read that backwards. That makes total sense, then! New posters should have a way to get noticed, first. Maybe the total amount of previous rewards could automatically set E.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit