Blade Runner 2049 - Movie ReviewsteemCreated with Sketch.

in movies •  7 years ago 

blade.jpg

Having received my Moviepass, the first film I saw "for free" was Blade Runner 2049. The Blade Runner sequel takes place 29 years later. A new blade runner, "K" (Ryan Gosling) is tasked with tracking down and eliminating an old terror cell. The world of 2049 has the same dystopian feel as 2020 earth, but with slightly enhanced elements.

blade2.jpg

Officer K has been tasked with hunting down a group of rebel androids. Sounds a lot like the premise of the original film. However, the world has changed. Officer K discovers a buried treasure which threatens to destroy the tentative balance society has found in our dystopian future. The knowledge of the contents of that box could spark a war. A revolution. The Wallace corporation learns of the revolutionary (evolutionary) evidence collected by Officer K and will stop at nothing to uncover the secrets connected to the discovery. Officer K follows his leads, crossing paths with many interesting characters even as he begins to doubt his own reality. It is as if he has his own internal struggle, man vs. himself, android style.

blade3.jpg

If Philip K. Dick were alive, I think he would approve of the sequel to the original film based on his book Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. Dick liked to explore alternate realities as well as government/corporate authoritarianism. This film has the same corporate feel as the original, pitting the LAPD against a large android corporation bent on building an android revolution. The film also mastered sleight of hand to give us all the answers while suggesting multiple possibilities. We aren't spoon fed the plot, which evolves at nice pace. Although the pace of the movie is sluggish at times. This film is fairly long (epic) at 2 hours 43 minutes. The pacing is good for that length of film, but I think it could have been scaled back significantly.

blade4.png

Blade Runner 2049 had the epic feel of the original. Director Denis Villanueve has done several films I enjoyed, to include Sicario, Prisoners and Incendies. The soundtrack has the dystopian industrial hum at times that augments the screen. The combination of soundtrack, writing and production quality were all spot on. The special effects were awesome and often paid homage to the original. Particularly the ability to manipulate images, which takes on a slightly new twist in this film. The dialogue was sharp. Writer Hampton Fancher returns from the original film, joined by Michael Green, whose credits are a combination of sci-fi and superheroes. My only complaint about the film was the length, which felt like it cold be shorter.

blade5.jpg

The casting was as good as the writing. I have been a fan of Ryan Gosling dating back to his lesser known film Lars and the Real Girl. If you haven't seen that film, rent it. Harrison Ford has more than just a cameo in this film, which I liked. Among the cameo appearances is Dave Bautista, who I love in Guardians of the Galaxy. It's nice to see him without the make up. Jared Leto is always solid, but also has a very small role in this film. The stand out performance, for me, was Sylvia Hoeks. Her performance as Luv, the Wallace Corporation enforcer, was fantastic. She brought an ice cold reality to the role that was chilling. Her steely character had an oddly likeable characteristic in spite of the sheer evil of her role. Hoeks was phenomenal. I hope to see more of her in the future. I can't imagine that this film could have been cast any better.

blade6.jpg

Blade Runner 2049 received an R Rating from the MPAA. The rating is well deserved. The film has plenty of graphic imagery to include ample nudity, violence and language. The nudity never felt gratuitous, but it left little to the imagination. There was also a tastefully handled (nudity free) sex scene that was actually visually appealing to me. A "virtual threesome" if you will. There was great attention to detail in this film, often with sexual and substance-abuse thematic material lurking in the shadows. I can't imagine an epic dystopican film without those elements. They were handled well, but definitely make this a film you don't want to bring younger viewers to.

blade7.jpg

Blade Runner 2049 was everything I was expecting and more. I have long been a fan of Philip K. Dick's work. His vision was amazing. I am eagerly anticipating the anthology of his work that Amazon is currently working on to augment their Man in the High Castle success. The casting, writing, acting, cinematography, special effects and sound track all come together to create a seamless trip into the dystopian future. While a bit too long, the film did not disappoint. The attention to detail gives this film the same credibility as the original. I would highly recommend seeing this one in the theater. 8/10.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Nice Review. I was okay with the length. It unfolds it's story in a way that allows you the time to reflect on each scene enough to move to the next. But, hey, YMMV.

You are right, however, that this film from the perspective of it's real plot, K's awakening, is closer to Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep than Blade Runner was.

The arc plot of BR was similar, but Deckard's arc really isn't. BR2049's main arc for K. is very similar and for that reason I think this may, in the end, be a better film. But, I'll wait about 10 years before making that definitive statement.

Hampton Fancher layered in Franz Kafka's The Trial into this story beautifully, and as a fan of both books, I was thrilled when I figured it out in the theater... because it makes perfect sense.

Here's my review if you're interested.

https://steemit.com/movies/@goldgoatsnguns/blade-runner-2049-officer-k-s-trial-by-cinematic-jury

I agree with everything you said and I did not like it either that it was too long and has moments of boredom but in the end you are happy that you chose to see such a movie.I liked also Sylvia Hoeks which played the negative character Luv and thanks for the great review @coldsteem.My rating 9/10 for now.

I'm with you. The movie was too slow for me, not as visually appealing as I expected it to be and missed out on a vast amount of technological (theoretical) integration.

I'm happy I watched it though. I give it a 6/10.

Wow. I'm glad you liked it. I still didn't see it, but a lot of people were disappointing with the script. I even saw some comparisons to the second Matrix film floating around (though I don't remember it well).
I think I will probably like it as well, Denis Villanueve hasn't disappointed me yet.
I saw Lars and the Real Girl, had to help a friend write a paper about this movie (a psychology paper), Ryan Gosling is an amazing actor and the movie is good, but man is it strange. Every time I think about it all I can think is "transitional object." Ryan Gosling is also an awards actor, so I wonder if he can get some awards from this movie.

It's hard to say if Ryan would get an award for this performance. He was rock solid. But he was overshadowed by Hoeks. This film it likely to rack a bunch of nominations in I'm sure.

Very good post @colsteem . .