Enough enabling, already!

in murder •  6 years ago 

Image

Another evil loser killed a bunch of people. This time at a mall and Walmart in El Paso, Texas.

It infuriates me that anti-gun bigots keep making this type of event more likely.

He, or a comparable evil loser, would have free rein at the local mall and Walmart. Because both of those places post "No Guns" signs. The stupid behind this sort of "thinking" astounds me.

I see people ignore the signs and open carry while shopping in the local Walmart. People who are obviously not Blue Line Gang special flowers. Probably unintentionally-- New Mexico is an open-carry state, after all. I've never seen the Walmart management throw anyone out for ignoring the "We don't care if you die" signs. But they are there as an invitation to evil losers, regardless. They make the customers and employees much less safe by their presence. If I were rude and didn't mind drawing attention to them I'd thank them for their service.

The local mall lost some of their "No Guns" signs over the past few years. You can actually walk in some entrances which don't have the insults posted by them. But one entrance that I know of still has one by it. I don't go there enough to have noticed whether people ignore that sign-- but you know they do.

If anyone ever decides to go on a murder spree, they aren't going to change their mind because guns are "forbidden" on the property. They'd just be able to murder uninterrupted for longer than they would if someone was shooting back. And all metal detectors at the door would do is cause the evil losers to come in shooting... while the useless alarms blare.

Anti-gun "laws"-- "gun control [sic] laws"-- KILL. Enough is enough.

Thank you for helping support KentforLiberty.com.
Donations and subscriptions are always appreciated!

Find me on Patreon

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Lawmakers need to make laws, they don't need to make sense. Business owners care about PR more than they care about reality.

Enough of you retards and your hero fantasies, that walmart was full of armed citizens and none of them did shit

[Citation needed]

An armed person (well, everyone actually) has as their primary responsibility defense of themselves and their family. Then, if they can and if they want to, they can defend those who were not responsible enough to be prepared... but they have no obligation to defend people who don't believe their own lives are worth defending enough to take the time, effort, and "legal" risk of being adequately armed at all times.

Would I risk arrest (or death-by-cop) to defend innocent people who didn't think enough of themselves and their loved ones to be armed? I don't know. I certainly don't blame anyone who chooses not to. Unlike some people.

Please give actual numbers of armed people inside those stores. It won't change a thing I said above, but you'll look less dishonest if you can prove what you claim.