let's consider music an activity. music as an abstract thing doesn't speak to my imagination in clear and simple way. there is a social and communicative aspect that is essential in musical activity. if we think about music without social and communicative background, it could at times be regarded as some masochistic or self indulgent activity. If you'd leave your experiences in this field for yourself, no one would mind as long as they wouldn't suspect anything. but let us think, that whatever you do in your everyday life, you combine it with making music, just as you percieve everything as music, even if you are a salesman, a sailor or a taxi driver. maybe your whole apparition would make you a little bit weird in reception. you can see your whole life as a work of art or a piece of music written or improvised by something you'd call god or spacetime or evolution or atmosphere. Is it important that you are the receiver of this music? this cosmos? harmony of the spheres? should you tell anyone about your way of thinking and perceiving? should you look for any explanations for your special way of thinking? should you ask yourself is it a pleasure or annoyance and then share the outcome of your examination? should you measure what you perceive looking for pleasent and unpleasent offtakes and pickups? should you decode the things you perceive and write about it or tell your friends? make a theory of harmony and disharmony? theory of rhytm? theory of music? if not, would it be a burden for you just to be silent about your interesting way of thinking? maybe you know the history of music. maybe you have your own view on the topic of music. maybe you try to follow the recent discoveries in theory of music, composition and improvisation. maybe you look for something new in these fields. it must be a hard task but i know that you can make it. listening to brain waves or controlling the parameters of any matter by brain waves. nothing special. maybe you even started to compose a DNA model of an android called "beethoven's portrait" that will compose music without hearing a sound or maybe you are programming a multi improvisational composition on the world wide web. well, still i think it's not the new music you are looking for, cause that is too simple. my imagination doesn't go further but your imagination probably can. now let us take a picture of the opposite site. maybe you think that after the XX century there is no point to create any new theory of music, to make music, or even to listen to music at all. it has no purpose, and you have enough of wasting your time on something that has no concrete application and you see no fun in repeating old and well known ways of thinking. maybe this is the end of music. maybe the word "music" is just a name for epigones of the old times that are just repeating old sounds or mixing samples of possible sounds. but what for? just for purposeless purpose or purposefull useslesness? why not? the meta-meta-music time has come. but how does that sound? maybe it is a recording of a thousand of millions of recordings of natural sounds, syntetic sounds, composed sounds and improvised sounds played backwards etc etc. you can continue. for your own pleassure, for recognition or dissatisfaction and irritation. go on. what if you want to pleasure or irritate other fellowhumans? sure, you don't have to stop on fellow humans. why not give it to other animals, plants or machines? why not think of machines programmed with usage of all available knowledge about human behaviour to take over in the field of making of music? they could be better than people. the only problem the would be the purpose of programming. we can choose even to start with all applications of music we can imagine; from curing, relaxing, influencing work efficiency, torturing, to evoking amazement, hypnotizing or killing. next step would be to command to learn from feedback and seek what is the best use of music in the changing enviroment. we can start from small inputs, like counting the income of a corporation or checking the pulse of people streaming music recomended by their favourite, commercial or non-commercial music streaming platform. maybe you could listen to compositions made by wonderful computers and then reflect if you can call them authors of the music they make? are they cybernetic persons allready? do they have their rights to freedom of speech and scientific reaserch? do they have the rights to have rights to compose whatever they like? forget it. get back to communication. what is communication?
what are the fundaments of this algebra? your need of discovery? your curiosity? your pleassure? your money? or what? when you should ask yourself about the reason to share with others? who are you communicating with using your imaginary thinking of the abillity to create music, of possibility of music creation, of medium you use to think and to share? do you need to prove something? do you need to change anything?