[Philosophy] Is dating or marrying a single mother violating the Non aggression principal (NAP)? Here is my argument for a yes to this question.

The argument is the following:

• Single mothers mostly use the force of the corrupt state to kidnap children from the real father, it happens today to a lot of children and fathers.

• Single mothers have proven to be bad parents and bad partners (Stefan Molyneux made all the arguments for this in his "why not to date a single mother" videos, which I agree with).

• A man that accept a single mother as partner, is supporting her previous life decisions and therefore supporting that she kidnapped this child/children with the force of the corrupt state.

• Single mothers have violated the Non aggression principal by using the coercive power of the corrupt state to kidnap one or more children.

• Men dating or marrying a single mother are supporting, accepting and living with a single mother.

= Men dating or marrying single mothers are supporting the use of coercive power by the corrupt state, which is a violation of the Non aggression principal, which again result in that men dating or marrying single mothers are violating the Non aggression principal.

---

Now I would like to know Stefan Molyneux's opinion on my argument and also ask what Jeff Berwick think about this argument. Stefan Molyneux have the capacity to debunk or stress-test my logic and if the argument is true I then also proofed that Jeff Berwick is not an anarchist, since he live with a single mother, that kidnapped a child from the real father in Germany.

I hope atleast Stefan Molyneux will debate my argument in one of his shows, I don't expect any response from Jeff Berwick, since he told me to "fuck off" when I presented the argument to him last year and have ignored me since, obviously because he dont want to be exposed for doing something that violate the Non aggression principal (NAP).

My argument could be flawed, I need a capacity like Stefan Molyneux to convince me if it is, since I think there is a huge change that my argument is 100% valid, but the topic is so big of a problem in the world that most people will not touch it.

Sending links to this post to Stefan Molyneux and a few other anarchists. Asking for a response.

Lasse Ehlers

Lasse Ehlers holds a Master degree in economics from Copenhagen University, Denmark (M.Sc. in economics) and consider himself a free-market economist with special expertise in the market of crypto currencies.

Lasse Ehlers - Crypto expert, Free-market Economist - I always know which cryptos to buy and hold.