Narrative Collapse reports the following:
‘They deleted the video and informed us that posting raw, unedited, commentary free videos of Antifa committing crimes is “hate speech.”
Yes, youtube is now actively trying to protect Antifa by deleting videos of their crimes. You can fight back against Google/Youtube censorship by downloading the Adblock Plus extension for your browser.’
Link to full story is here!
Oh, the horrors! A private company deciding who gets to post drivel on their site! Where will it end?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is such a bad thing. Fortunately, more and more local broadcast stations are starting to show these types of thing on local broadcasts and thus will be available on the internet if you search from them using Bing, Yahoo or DuckDuckGo. While Google has a lot of power it doesn't own the internet (even though it might seem like it).
This type of censorship in the long run is going to hurt Google. "Do No Evil" was great while it lasted :) but they obviously have lost their original focus and now want to censor anything HATE related which can be anything. Own a gun? Oh, guns kill thus guns are HATE related and banned. How long before "conservative" media is completely associated to "alt-right" by Google and thus censored? The writing is already on the wall.
It's time we all start to move on from Google with other service that can replace the services they offer. There are other search engines such as the excellent DuckDuckGo. There are and always have been replacements for Gmail.
Right now Google has something of a lock on videos with YouTube but hopefully this will change soon as well with tools similar to BitChute or similar P2P video sharing.
Sure Google censoring in the near term will hurt us all but like all free enterprises will pay the price in the long run as other companies move in to replace them. Chances are we'll see this happen as whole groups get banned. Example Gun related, conservative media, etc... Once you start to censor material that the average person is looking for people will wake the hell up.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
following you, absolutely they're pretending that the fascists of antifa are on the side of the good it's disgusting
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you, and I'm following back.👌
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Rights and Responsibilities.
For as long as one exercises the latter then one deserves the former.
I have yet to make up my mind about this instance (in part because I could have benefited from a short summary of the crime being covered up) but I would like to throw this out there for both parties to reflect upon.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Butthurt @preparedwombat stalks me, and then trolls my posts, and downvotes them.
Perhaps you should speak to the snowflake, and not me.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I was replying to your comment - and thus I gave you further opportunity to hear your side of this story.
I also feel that you are in greater need of my guidance than he (he is of a heavier class than yourself rep-wise - and he seems to deride the content while you deride the user - something to mull over).
Therein already lies part of my advice. It is the easiest thing in the World to label something as rubbish (or drivel). It tends to be harder and yet more productive to explain why such is considered so.
As such, always probe the reasoning of a user. You might learn something - and you also pressure the user to go through your content while looking for materials for justification. Alternatively a recount of that user's personal perspective of the perspective concerned. Win either way.
Also, do try to avoid throwing labels at people. Reserve them for arguments (like he did) if you must.
For instance, it would have been more productive to ask @preparedwombat to substantiate his ill-substantiated claims.
Notice the bold text - its unnecessary (sentence would have worked well without it), potentially untrue (yet hard to call out as such as his comment lacked any backing reasoning) and, most importantly, non-insulting.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I honestly doubt @preparedwombat is a rational person @pathforger.
How can you reason with someone who ignores points of fact or truth?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit