was anyone still under the impression that these systems were secure?
"While it is undeniable websites are vulnerable to hackers, election night reporting websites are only used to publish preliminary, unofficial results for the public and the media. The sites are not connected to vote-counting equipment and could never change actual election result"
But if people don't know who others voted for how will they know who to vote for? ;)
This is about creating distrust and paranoia. People who will get in there will sow distrust of the governmental official pages. If I were anyone in state government, I would be hardening these pages. This is as bad as buying votes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't think the hacker kids want to create distrust and paranoia, just perhaps to highlight a vulnerability.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No it has nothing to do with the kids.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
did you read the article?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit