So the US, the UK and France are only supposed to be attacking Syrian sites they know are chemical weapons sites. Now I just want to ask, if these assholes knew where these chemical facilities where at, why didn't they destroy them before they used these chemicals?
Doesn't this strike any of you as kind of stupid on their part? I think this is pure crap, they attack now after having talked with the Russians, attack anything and then say we took out all the chemical facilities, the Russians don't lose any personnel and nobody loses face, only thing is if you actually bombed they probably killed more civilians than the alleged chemical attacks.
I think bombing Syria would be absurd, but Assad is even more stupid if he really used chemical weapons again.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
IF, and the thing is do you stop people being killed with chemical weapons because its evil, but keep killing them with bombs because that's OK?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I completely agree. We all know USA, Saudi Arabia and other major countries don't want Assad in charge, for geopolitical strategies, while Russia and Iran are on the opposite side. And they say cold war was over...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit