Given that Wolff’s fire comes largely out as swamped in the neo-populistic fury and embodies a reprehensive tone towards the president, availability of so effusive hearsay during the stated span of time, readiness of white-house officials to corroborate with the whistle-blower, and ambivalence that usually accompanies families when they are struck with 'unanticipated' and 'tearful' rise to being the FIRST, signify much more than what meets the eye. However, again, one has to admit that impulsiveness looms large while there is a need for the POTUS to endure time and perhaps tide as well to get himself accustomed to the colossal aura of responsibility, sobriety, and being proactive but with a saner orientation.
Let alone POTUS, the episodes outlined in F&F about JAVANKA raise eye-brow as well as the pattern and extent of machinations attributed to the couple goes, perhaps, too far
Yes, there's definitely tons of legal, ethical, epoch-shifting and history-making fodder. For me, what stands out is how low the mainstream discourse has to go to get it b/c our elected officials and "our institutions" simply aren't doing their job.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit