@riva-16 Fair enough except his title is "Truth About Xenophobia" while only spreading "xenophobia" and funny how he ignores real truths like Bissonnette is as stated by multiple former classmates very "pro-Israel, pro-Trump, anti-immigration". Fyi you don't get described as "pro-Israel" multiple times, unless you were a person that consistently defended their policies. On his Facebook page among his likes were also "Trump, IDF and United with Israel" pages.
Radical Zionism extremist does exist and many like Dan choose to ignore it. Even when Muslims get shot down by a known Zionist they focus on Islam. (that doesn't seem odd to you)
Point is, there was not much truth in his report at all. Are you familiar with Baruch Goldstein? Because I doubt Dan is, because it doesn't fit his rhetoric
I am not familiar with who that is. But your points are well taking. Radical Zionism is a very dangerous thing as well. It's good to point these matters out, and not be shy about them. I just wish more people would realize how radicalized people from all ideologies are used as tools to push forward agendas. Whether they are set up by an intelligence agency, or acting on their own accord TPTSB never waste a good crisis. I find Dans reporting to be overall fair and decent. However, I do agree with your points, this defientaly wasn't one of his best reports.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think the key is open dialogue without condemning people for what they think. I respect Dan for bringing that up. But you make good points. News can either be dry facts, which is not entertaining, or storytelling. It's difficult to communicate issues to people who are unaware, in a way that gets their attention and brings clarity. I don't think it's easy to not have any rhetoric.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit