Thank you for your detailed and informative article.
Are you able to give the reference / source and date of the pie chart
above? it makes sense but requires a source/reference.
No worries if you no longer have the reference , you have included many others.
Thanks for your time in reading this.
There is a fully sourced PDF attached to this Blog. I wrote it to write a Childrens science book for my Children There are lots of Charts there.
https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2016/11/21/climate-change-agw-and-all-points-from-activism-to-skepticism/
The data in Frances' pie chart is at this link from my PDF
http://ilovemycarbondioxide.com/
It is also presetneted in this video
That CO2 is a trace Gas and also a "Geen House Gas" is not controvesrsial what is controversial is the Hypothesised claim that "Climate Feed Back" CO2 "re-radiating energy its a big debate and is important to alarmist conjectures as with each doubling of CO2 the Warming effect is halved so a feed back conjecture allows the idea to get past a known physical limit to how much warming CO2 can cause at the wavelegnths that it absorbs Radiation.
https://scienceofdoom.com/2019/01/10/opinions-and-perspectives-7-global-temperature-change-from-doubling-co2/
The Science of Doom has a few small things which I would quibble with but it is probably the best Source in the serious Climate Science supporting of CO2 based Climate Policy, at least it was when I was doing my main Study on all of this around 8 years ago, I now mainly read newly published research. Frances, in my opinion, has a really good handle on this and the ie chart makes its point properly and effectively.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is Monkton et al paper which tackles this error in IPCC conjecture
https://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm
This Is Glassmans Acquital of COS Paper
http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2006/10/co2_acquittal.html
http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2009/03/_internal_modeling_mistakes_by.html
Glassman's General Talk on Scientific Modeling COnjecture, Hypothesis, Theory and Laws in Science, and the semantics of Maths and Logic
I am putting together part two of this Talk I did yesterday , today dealing with Fast Fourier Analysis and Dynamic Systems modeling and Finite element analysis of CHaotic Dynamical systems,
This was Part 1.
This is a video talk I did on Quilligan, Commoning and The Brandt Report
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I highly commed your grasp of science and climate.
I do recommend that you title your talks in less jargon. Rather than putting the scientific terms in the title, as seems reasonable to anyone familiar with such matters, use terms more evocative of the essential point of your talks: Why AGW is a farce; or, why science does not support AGW.
Hopefully AGW isn't too much jargon already.
Thanks!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit