Si l’article 24 interdisant de diffuser des images de policiers a beaucoup fait parler d’elle, d’autres aspects de la proposition de loi “sécurité globale” posent problème, comme la surveillance par des drones ou le recours massif à la sécurité privée.
Publicité
La proposition de loi “sécurité globale” n’a pas fini de faire parler d’elle. Au lendemain de débats houleux à l’Assemblée nationale, de nouvelles manifestations sont prévues à Paris et dans toute la France, samedi 21 novembre, à l’appel d’organisations de journalistes, syndicats et collectifs de défense de droits humains.
Lors de la poursuite de l’examen de la proposition de loi à l’Assemblée nationale, vendredi 20 novembre, le gouvernement a tenté de rassurer sur la liberté de la presse en modifiant l’article 24 visant à interdire la diffusion d’images de policiers permettant leur identification. Un amendement a été ajouté : il précise que “les dispositions envisagées ne feront nul obstacle à la liberté d’informer et que le délit créé par le texte visera uniquement le fait de diffuser des images dans le but qu’il soit manifestement porté atteinte à l’intégrité physique ou psychique” d’un policier, d’un militaire ou d’un gendarme. Si l’opposition n’a pas été convaincue, l’article controversé a bien été adopté par 146 voix pour et 24 voix contre.
Le ministre @GDarmanin assure que “journalistes” comme “citoyens” pourront continuer à “filmer et diffuser” des opérations de police “sans floutage”. En revanche, “diffuser un visage” en “commentant” avec “l’intention de nuire” pourra être poursuivi.#DirectAN #PPLSecuriteGlobale pic.twitter.com/OdYqJl6Hc5
— LCP (@LCP) November 20, 2020
Mais au-delà de l’article 24, c’est bien l’ensemble de la proposition de loi, portée par les députés La République en marche (LREM) Alice Thourot et Jean-Michel Fauvergue, ancien patron du Raid, qui est contesté par les défenseurs des droits de l’Homme.
“Nous dénonçons une loi liberticide qui menace la liberté d’expression, le droit à manifester et le droit à la vie privée, affirme Anne-Sophie Simpère, d’Amnesty International France, contactée par France 24. Cette loi propose de traiter l’ensemble de la société française à l’aune de la menace terroriste. Cela aurait des conséquences dangereuses pour les libertés individuelles.”
La Défenseure des droits, Claire Hédon, a elle aussi critiqué la proposition de loi “sécurité globale”, soulignant, dans un avis publié le 5 novembre, que plusieurs articles étaient “susceptibles de porter atteinte à des droits fondamentaux”, telles que “la vie privée” et “la liberté d’information”. Elle a également réclamé, vendredi, “le retrait” de l’article 24 qu’elle juge “inutile” et potentiellement nuisible au contrôle de l’action des policiers et gendarmes.
Des accusations balayées par le ministre de l’Intérieur, Gérald Darmanin. Selon lui, le texte en cours d’examen au Palais Bourbon est utile car il vise à “améliorer très fortement les dispositions législatives qui permettent d’imposer la sécurité républicaine, c’est-à-dire l’ordre républicain, c’est-à-dire la condition des libertés publiques”.
La #PPLSécuritéGlobale, c’est quoi ?
Un texte ambitieux et très attendu par le secteur, qui permettra :
1️⃣ De mieux faire travailler ensemble tous les acteurs de la sécurité.
2️⃣ De mieux protéger les policiers, les gendarmes, les pompiers, face aux menaces.
Surveillance de masse grâce aux drones
Indéniablement, la proposition de loi, sur laquelle les députés voteront le 24 novembre, propose d’accroitre considérablement les moyens de surveillance de la police. Or, c’est bien sur cet aspect que se concentrent les critiques. Pour ses opposants, une telle surveillance nuirait aux libertés individuelles.
Alors que les caméras piétons embarquées sur les policiers étaient jusqu’ici uniquement utilisées a posteriori pour éclairer des faits contestés, l’article 21 autorise la transmission des images “en temps réel au poste de commandement du service concerné” et leur exploitation.
À lire : Filmer la police, bientôt un délit ? La loi qui inquiète les journalistes français
De même, l’article 22 permet l’utilisation des drones avec caméras aéroportées et ainsi la collecte massive et indistincte de données à caractère personnel.
“Cet article permet d’utiliser en toute circonstance les drones mais ne les encadre pas, déplore Anne-Sophie Simpere. Leur utilisation devrait être liée à une nécessité légitime par rapport à un objectif déterminé. C’est une surveillance qui menace le droit à la vie privée et qui fait craindre, avec l’utilisation des caméras piétons, l’arrivée prochaine de la reconnaissance faciale.”
Montée en puissance de la sécurité privée
Le résumé de la semaine
France 24 vous propose de revenir sur les actualités qui ont marqué la semaine
Je m’abonne
Sur ce dernier point, le gouvernement et la majorité ont évoqué des “fantasmes” de l’opposition, mais les amendements visant à interdire dans l’avenir toute utilisation de la reconnaissance faciale ont tous été rejetés vendredi matin.
La loi “sécurité globale” donnera également à la police municipale de nouvelles prérogatives, dont la possibilité de constater par exemple des infractions au code de la route ou des délits, de procéder à des contrôles d’identité et à des saisies.
Several of Giuliani’s cases have been withdrawn or dismissed as groundless. In a court appearance this week, he kept denouncing election fraud until the judge forced him to admit the case at hand had no relation to fraud.
In his press conference Thursday he claimed to have certain evidence of election crimes, but wouldn’t produce it.
Some of the other evidence he offered up, alleged witness statements, was quickly debunked by media.
But that didn’t stop him.
“We have enough evidence without that to overturn this election. We have it from the affidavits of American citizens, but that’s a matter of national security that we’re talking about now,” he said.
“If that’s not a headline tomorrow, then you don’t know what a headline is.”
The hair coloring melting down the sides of his face while he declared long-dead Venezuelan caudillo Hugo Chavez caused President Donald Trump’s election defeat made one thing clear — Rudy Giuliani is no longer “America’s Mayor.”
The accolade Giuliani earned for his calm fortitude in leading New York City after the September 11, 2001 attacks has dissolved in a series of increasingly bizarre claims that Democrats, the media, and yes, the late Venezuelan dictator, had robbed Trump of reelection.
His press conference Thursday, pushing election conspiracy theories without any evidence, was Giuliani’s latest audacious, fact-shy display on behalf of Trump, who lost the November 3 election to Democrat Joe Biden but refuses to concede defeat.
“We cannot allow these crooks, because that’s what they are, to steal an election from the American people. They elected Donald Trump. They didn’t elect Joe Biden,” Giuliani said, ignoring Biden’s nearly six million vote margin over Trump.
The Republican governor of Maryland, Larry Hogan, called the press conference a “train wreck.”
site : https://framaforms.org/full-watch-demon-slayer-mugen-train-2020-full-movi-online-free-hd-1606098776
And Chris Krebs, the head of US election security recently fired by Trump, called it “the most dangerous 1hr 45 minutes of television in American history. And possibly the craziest.”
- $20,000 a day? -
According to the New York Times this week, Giuliani had asked to be paid $20,000 a day for his performances on behalf of Trump — though the same report said it was unclear how much compensation he would ultimately receive.
Money aside, Robert Polner, editor of a book on Giuliani, says that the once-feared federal prosecutor then New York mayor has always been a “restless political opportunist” for whom credibility was not a priority.
The 9/11 attacks set Giuliani up for bigger things, with one writer comparing his response to Winston Churchill.
site : https://365-days-full-movie-mp.tumblr.com/
But that may have been Giuliani’s finest hour.
He set his sights on a White House run in 2008, but a questionable primary strategy failed, as did his leaning on his September 11 credentials without developing a broader platform.
“There’s only three things he mentions in a sentence: a noun, a verb and 9/11,” said Biden, who that year sought the Democratic presidential nomination.
site : https://greenland-movie-full-mp.tumblr.com/
- ‘Truth isn’t truth’ -
The 2008 loss left him adrift, but eventually his longtime New York friend and political ally Trump offered a way forward.
“Giuliani saw a path to power as a result of his friendship with Trump, and never looked back,” said Polner.
site : https://tenet-full-movie-mp.tumblr.com/
His energy and willingness to defend Trump on anything made him essential.
When an embarrassing tape threatened to kill Trump’s 2016 chances, Giuliani did a marathon of television interviews to explain it away, effectively neutering the problem.
After the election Trump didn’t reward his wish to be named secretary of state, but Giuliani hardly suffered.
site : https://come-play-movie-full-mp.tumblr.com/
He earned millions of dollars from countries and companies needing a lobbyist with a direct line into the Oval Office.
In early 2018 the president hired him to help fight against the Mueller investigation.
With a Trump-like flair for showmanship, Giuliani became a constant presence on television defending the president and accusing investigators and the media of corruption and bias.
site : https://megan-is-missing-movie-full-mp.tumblr.com/
Tireless, he often spoke so much he would contradict what he said moments before, or, as in August 2018 on NBC, defend the president with remarkable statements like “Truth isn’t truth.”
- Impeachment -
But Giuliani’s efforts also led to trouble.
site :
Anticipating Biden would run against Trump in 2020, in late 2018 Giuliani led an effort to find dirt on the Democrat and his son, who had done business in Ukraine.
Based on what Giuliani claimed to find, Trump froze aid to Ukraine, telling the country’s president to hand over alleged evidence of Biden’s corruption.
That illegal act led to Trump becoming only the third president in history to be impeached.
site :
The effort to reverse Trump’s clear election loss appears Giuliani’s most Sisyphean challenge.
A briefing he billed as a major press event after the vote was mercilessly mocked when it emerged the venue was not the plush Four Seasons hotel in Philadelphia, as tweeted by Trump, but a suburban garden center between a crematorium and an adult book store — Four Seasons Total Landscaping.
To pile ignominy on farce, the press conference was held at the moment US news networks announced Trump had lost the election after four days of ballot counting.
site :
Several of Giuliani’s cases have been withdrawn or dismissed as groundless. In a court appearance this week, he kept denouncing election fraud until the judge forced him to admit the case at hand had no relation to fraud.
In his press conference Thursday he claimed to have certain evidence of election crimes, but wouldn’t produce it.
Some of the other evidence he offered up, alleged witness statements, was quickly debunked by media.
site :
But that didn’t stop him.
“We have enough evidence without that to overturn this election. We have it from the affidavits of American citizens, but that’s a matter of national security that we’re talking about now,” he said.
“If that’s not a headline tomorrow, then you don’t know what a headline is.”
site :
An American jailed in 1985 for spying for Israel was released from strict parole conditions Friday, allowing his move to Israel, the US Justice Department said.
Jonathan Pollard served 30 years for giving away classified US documents and had been confined by parole terms to the United States since his release in 2015, despite Israeli pressure to allow him to leave.
“After a review of Mr. Pollard’s case, the US Parole Commission has found that there is no evidence to conclude that he is likely to violate the law,” the Justice Department said.
site :
- Thousands of documents passed -
Pollard, 66, was a US Navy intelligence analyst in the mid-1980s when he made contact with an Israeli colonel in New York and began sending US secrets to Israel in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars.
Pollard, who is Jewish, passed thousands of crucial US documents to Israel, straining relations between the two close allies.
site :
Israel’s October 1985 raid on the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s Tunis headquarters that killed around 60 people was planned with information from Pollard, according to CIA documents declassified in 2012.
He was arrested in 1985 and was sentenced to life in prison two years later, despite pleading guilty in a deal his attorneys expected would result in a more lenient sentence.
After his release in 2015, he was kept in the United States by parole rules and not allowed to travel to Israel where his wife, whom he married after he was jailed, lived.
site :
He remained subject to a curfew, had to wear a wrist monitor, and was prohibited from working for any company that lacked US government monitoring software on its computer systems.
In addition he was restricted from traveling abroad.
The restrictions, his lawyers said, had been “insurmountable impediments on Mr. Pollard’s ability to earn a living.”
site :
Israel, where he is regarded as a hero and which awarded him citizenship in 1995, repeatedly pressured Washington for the release of Pollard, making it one of the top issues of bilateral relations.
But the US intelligence community was reportedly deeply opposed to giving him anything less than the sentence he received, which was similar to the sentences given in serious spying cases related to Russia.
According to the New York Times, in 1998, as president Bill Clinton presided over Middle East peace talks, CIA director George Tenet threatened to resign if Clinton bowed to Israeli pressure to include Pollard’s release in any peace deal.
“It’s going to be pretty damn annoying if this traitor gets a celebratory heroes welcome in Tel Aviv. If Israelis are smart, this is done very low key,” tweeted former CIA case officer Marc Polymeropoulos.
- Few comments -
Pollard’s lawyers, Eliot Lauer and Jacques Semmelman, said in a statement that they are “grateful and delighted that our client is finally free of any restrictions, and is now a free man in all respects.”
“We look forward to seeing our client in Israel,” they said.
“Mr. Pollard is happy to finally be able to assist his beloved wife Esther, who is fighting an aggressive form of cancer,” they added.
“Mr. Pollard would like people to know that it was his wife, more than anyone else, who kept him alive during all the years he was in prison.”
In the statement Pollard also thanked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Ambassador Ron Dermer for their efforts on his behalf.
There was little immediate reaction from US Jewish organizations or political figures, perhaps reflecting the sensitivity of commenting on a US citizen who spied against his country for one of its closest allies.
In 2005, a US defense department official, Larry Franklin, was charged with passing US secrets to Israel via the influential lobby the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC.
Franklin had verbally shared classified information regarding Iran with two AIPAC officials, who then informed Israel.
Franklin was sentenced to 13 years in prison in 2009.
But three years later the sentence was cut to 10 months under house arrest, after prosecutors dropped their spying conspiracy cases against the two AIPAC officials.