Couple months ago I wrote about a story of two children who were the youngest (9 and 11) to be euthanized in Belgium.
You can read that story here
Youthanasia: The normalization of suicide just took a emotional turn.
Belgium law
"In effect, the new law will permit children of any age to request euthanasia provided that they understand the consequences of their decision as verified and certified by a child psychiatrist or psychologist. The child must be in a ῾medically futile condition of constant and unbearable physical suffering that cannot be alleviated and that will result in death in the short term’ (Euthanasia Act 2002, section 3§1) and, although no age restriction is given, the child must also display the ῾capacity of discernment’ and be ῾conscious at the moment of making the request.’ (Euthanasia Act 2002, section 3§1). In addition, the child’s decision must be supported by a parent or legal guardian who has a right of veto. These statutory safeguards are rightly stringent and will limit those children who qualify. On this basis it is anticipated that the potential impact of the change in the law will be limited, albeit that this is very necessary."
- source
In my post I speculated that this was only the beginning of a very disturbing trend, that will spread into many countries around the world.
Now let's get to the reason for this post. Why am I quoting from a post from 2 months ago?
Reported on by Nancy Flanders of "live action"
"Doctors at Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children, known as SickKids, have laid out a “road map” for killing their patients, including cases in which they would do so without parental permission."
"In the proposed policy published in the British Medical Journal’s Med Ethics, backed by the University of Toronto’s Joint Centre for Bioethics, doctors, administrators, and ethicists look at the “ethical challenges of providing Medical Assistance in Dying in a paediatric setting” and outline how assisted suicide would play out for children at Sick Kids. Their flowchart does not include discussing assisted suicide with parents until a “reflection period” occurs after the child has already been killed." source
Sounds crazy right? But! Here from the British Medical Journal
Now, I didn't read anything about killing kids, excluding the parents. Nor did I read anything about the inclusion of parental consent, not even the word 'parent' appears. However, I only have access to the abstract of the paper. Live action likely paid the access fee and is reporting based off what they read in the entire paper. Regardless, what I am seeing in the abstract is very disturbing enough. And I find the acronym M.A.I.D. Very interesting. What does a maid do?
- source
Coincidence? I really wonder if that was thought out or not. Anyways!
"The authors of the paper are aware that this would come with “potentially serious consequences for practitioners and institutions”, but hope to “reduce social stigma” surrounding the euthanasia of children. If a child is considered “capable” and wants assisted suicide, he or she would also be able to say they want to die, and that they don’t want their parents to know until after the fact. Doctors would then be unable to tell the parents due to confidentiality laws. Legally, Ontario’s laws do not require that parents be involved in a minor’s decision to refuse treatment and therefore, this paper argues that they shouldn’t be involved in a minor’s decision to die by assisted suicide either." live action news
Why do you want to remove the stigma of killing kids? That should never be socially acceptable! It should be an extremely rare case where there was no other options and the PARENTS (without third party pressures) considered every option possible and came to that decision. Should all that be done, then perhaps a decision to euthanize could be made. Anything other than that is sick!
"Ontario’s laws do not require that parents be involved in a minor’s decision to refuse treatment and therefore, this paper argues that they shouldn’t be involved in a minor’s decision to die by assisted suicide either." Seriously!? Why would they make such a law? You have o ask yourself why would they make such a law if not to take the power out of the hands of the parents?
These bastards are trying to separate children from the parents in all aspects of life. It's starts with the public schools system. Well actually it's starts with the economy and the cost of living, which forces families to choose public schooling because they do not have the time and money to homeschool their children. So the state does it, thy program your children while you slave away only to be taxed in order to pay the state. Best believe I have a major post in the back of my head all on this agenda. But for now back to the topic at hand.
Quote from my previous post
"Eventually, as the epidemic of suicide contagion continues among minors. We will see more reforms, more qualifications for euthanasia will be added. It's a process of baby steps to where suicide is so normal that we have public suicide booths on the street corner." - VenomnymouS
Why are they pushing euthanasia for minors?
It's simple, children are underdeveloped mentally and therefore easier to manipulate. They are highly emotional and fall victim to the Zionist social media programming. They don't always say things they really mean. Children lack the proper faculties to understand the ramifications of consenting to these madmen. And keeping the parents out of this conversation bares deadly consequences.
What it all comes down to is depopulation folks. They want to depopulate the planet, and they don't want to wait for us to get old (and potentially risk people having children)anymore. They coming after our kids now. They want to get'em while they are young and easily brainwashed by their programming on mental illness and suicidal contagion in their media.
Let's not forget
- source
The stones sync up with the UN agenda 2030 sustainable development goals.
Toxic food, water, air. Toxic media, planned parenthood, MeToo, the lgbtqwxyz agenda. All just pieces of the depopulation puzzle. Don't take my word for it, go out and do the research yourself. All I'm trying to do is point people in the right direction.
Thanks for reading, please leave any comments/questions and complaints in the comment section below.
My previous work related to this topic.
'Let's talk' about the normalization of mental illness
13 reasons how and why they're normalizing suicide
The Elon Musk of Assisted Suicide and his 'Eyelid Activated' Kill Pod
Other ways you can interact with me.
Whaleshares: Venomnymous
Weku: VenomnymouS
Twitter: VenomnymouS
Vero username: Venomnymous
Youtube: I Am AwareWolf
Minds @venomnymous
Somee.social: VenomnymouS
Notice a pattern yet?
Discord @venonymous#7826
Trybe.one: venomnymous
Bitchute : venomnymous
Referral links
Presearch signup
https://presearch.org/signup?rid=101528
BUNZ: Upcycle your old stuff and earn Crypto posting ads for your old stuff.
Have you tried Bunz? Sign up using my link and get an extra 500 BTZ.
https://epap9.app.goo.gl/7twSxDsAuUcs3BsG8
E-Beg wallets
E-Beg wallets
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I upvoted your post.
Keep steeming for a better tomorrow.
@Acknowledgement - God Bless
Posted using https://Steeming.com condenser site.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The Third Reich had an euthanasia program, which was designated T4. At Nueremberg, the puffed-up victors condemned T4 as crimes against humanity. Modern Western historians condemn T4 program as one of many examples of Nazi atrocities. Yet, merely 80 years later, the same victors who pontificated morality and "human" rights to the defeated, comdemned their defeated foes as worst of humanity, launch their own T4 program.
While the ethos of the Third Reich rationalized T4 via the doctrine of racial purity and advancement, the modern humanist West justify their T4 with psychobabble mumbo-jumbo of alleviating "pain and suffering." At least the Nazi rationalization is logical and rational given their underlying premise of sacrosanct racial purity; modern bullshit does not even have logic relying entirely on whimsical feelings, ever-changing definition of "human rights," and abstract notion of "compassion."
Modern humanist West can not even be categorized as evil. They are truly beneath contempt.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 10,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit