RE: NSA "Sincerely Regrets" Deleting All Bush-Era Surveillance Data It Was Ordered To Preserve

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

NSA "Sincerely Regrets" Deleting All Bush-Era Surveillance Data It Was Ordered To Preserve

in nsa •  7 years ago 

I'm unsure of the specific law and if anyone could inform me that'd be great: why did we extend the NSA's power for six years, instead of something like two or four? Is it still possible to curtail their increasing power?

Obviously it seems likely that there was peculiarly incriminating evidence contained within that data. It would be interesting to know what type of data those records entailed. If the NSA backs-up/keeps record of phone calls, text messages, emails, etc., does anyone keep a back-up of the NSA? Apparently not.

Some things never change and it seems as much as the public dislikes the NSA (wear your tin foil hats and cover your webcams!!!), they simply provide too much secretive benefit to our government. Although as the NSA continues to become autonomous, we should seek to reign in their grasps before it's too late.

However, it may already be.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Just a guess but the 6 years might be in an attempt to keep it from being political considering the administration is on 4 years terms. I think the Fed chair also gets a 6 year term.

Ah yeah that does make sense. Thanks for the insight.

Yeah it seems quite like that.