U.S. ecologist says that;
People are not the origin of the Earth, informs dailymail.co.uk.
Dr. Ellis Silver in his book explains that Aliens about 10 thousand years ago bring here all us. In their new book Dr. Ellis argues that such a hypothesis supported by some physiological portraits, showing that human not develop along with other species on our planet.
The physiological characteristics like how skin sensitivity to the sun, all we will soon suffer from sunlight, not enjoying from the natural food. We need to cook it bakes…
Humanity is supposedly the most developed and the human race is oddly not fit to live here
People are naturally violent and maybe the land can be a planet-prison.
Dr. Ellis Silver intended to trigger a debate on this theme.
While the land partly meets the needs of people, as could believe in this, us here brought the aliens.
From the evidence of the theory of evolution is looking for the start of the second half of the nineteenth century, going crazy transitional species fossils search.
Talking about artifacts that could prove the reliability of the theory of evolution, which validate its claim that one kind of (simple) change creates a new kind of (complex)
If evolution was in fact, it is today, studying fossils, we aptikri abundant evidence that some species have changed the other.
However, despite the fact that museums around the world has about 100 million fossils, carefully recorded in the catalogs;
No there is no evidence that new species arose change old.
Detected is the only modern species, plus a certain quantity extinct.
There is no transition or "half" of shapes, and their, if the theory of evolution are indeed correct, it should be tens of thousands of shapes.
ALL fossil "human evolution" certificates, including proven falsifications can accommodate the size of a small coffin box. All of them come from far spaced locations.
There is no specified or at least a reliable estimate of their age and the absence of any indication that all the different "people" are related to each other in origin or kinship.
Thus, Darwin and his usual manner to provide hypotheses instead based on facts, possibly only shrugs from the potential of such accusations. With her by saying that in the future palaeontologists no doubt fill this gap.
However, as we see this "something" to fill the gap does not exist.
Human evolution "certificates" not exist!?
(Photo Credit - pixabay)
© 2018