First of all I never said it deserved more earnings. So lets not put words on the page that are not there.

My question directed at the man up top was concerning censorship, I was wondering what type of censorship as he did not say.

I said why is "Bernie Sanders" not being censored/banned. But these other accounts are being addressed in such a way.

Since Pal is clearly centralized then in that case they should use some of that centralized power to get rid of the biggest abuser of all time "Bernie". That is the point of my 2nd comment in this string which was directed at you.

Getting rid of people who have never used the platform, while the biggest abuser of all time is allowed to partake.. is like getting rid of Hitlers dog.. while letting him go on killing Jews.

My point is there are bigger fish to fry, than banning people whom have never, not even once.. used the platform.

But you didn't address that. You just gave a strawman argument telling me to give money to the guy. No one was saying to give the guy money.

My point was so much larger than the guy above this string of comments.

Why worry about the tar tar sauce in the kitchen of the Titanic, and if it tastes just right.. while the hull has a massive hole in it from an ice burg.. and the ship is sinking. Bernie is that hole in the hull. So again.. if Bernie is not behind Pal.. why is he not banned since Pal is clearly centralized? They do say death threats are reason for ban on this 'Liberty' website.. so where is the liberty in allowing him to stay? And who could possibly argue for him to stay and remain unbanned.. while the platform is keeping busy banning those whom have never even used it.

You are a smart lady Lyndsay. You know for a fact that no where did I say that man deserved more. I was inquiring pertaining to his claims of censorship on Pal, seeing as my own recent experience was a distasteful one with them. I was curious to learn more about his. All while completely disagreeing with his statement.

But instead of having a decent conversation with me about real questions, and concerns that I have brought up, you instead gave me that.

You of all people should be concerned why he is allowed over there. However I think we both know the answer. One of us will admit it, and the other will change the topic to discussing things that were never said, instead of trying to find answers.

So on that note. Take care.