Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

What does this mean to you?

Here's my take, we must define "think" and depending on what "think" is either the rule book is all this person is allowed to use to make decisions or at random times the book will be completely ignored. (Check out my article on AI it will help better explain what I mean)

The question is not about a definition of 'thinking'. We can define it as we want for many different proposes. Searle's argument is direct to challenge the idea according to which a machine can think understanding 'think' as usual in English. His idea, as far as I can understand, an 'intentional semantics' or 'representational semantics' is required for the correct attribution of thinking.

Thank you for your feedback. I'm looking forward to reading your paper. Where can I find it?

Using irrelevant tags, especially popular tags, makes it hard to find good and relevant content.
Please try to use only relevant tags when posting!

#steemit

Please only use the “steemit” tag for articles distinctly related to Steemit, the website, itself.

Thank for your feedback and advice. I'll work on it!