The video above is part-2. Part- 1 is called The Atheist Pledge and is here. Part-3 is called The Enlightenment and The J.Q....found HERE...
In The Atheist Pledge, I suggest atheists and materialists will abandon their convictions and accept the Noahide Laws rather than forfeit their lives. One of the points I didn't quite get across is that the Demiurge wants all the nation-states to be saturated in the religions it created and this is why the archons are setting up the conditions for the return of religion. The smarter atheists out there know this as regression. But it's being manufactured via the dialectic towards a specific endpoint in Jerusalem. In a sense, what I'm asking here is if the will to survival will trump personal conviction? Will Mr. Dawkins commit to living under the Seven Noahide laws enacted by the messiah worldwide from Jerusalem or will he reject them? As a Christian Gnostic, I will REJECT this Messiah because I don't believe Noah existed...What about you?
In The J.Q. part-3... I suggest one possibility of why that is and wonder if materialism and atheism were Psy-ops of the tribe. It's the simplest explanation for why they will convert away from materialism. One thing I forgot to mention @ 12:20: my interpretation of Marx's J.Q. is that he wanted to replace religion and ideology with an overarching superstructure aimed at protecting Jewish interests, and if that resembles anything near close to the truth, then the internet and digitization of the economy has achieved this goal...
BTW: there are plenty of well trained paid actors out there who mix their perfect diction with poisoned propaganda so if that's what you like to feed on then, by all means, do so...Here you'll get a faulty presentation mixed with authenticity and hopefully some good ideas that are not mired with hidden agendas...
Basically, I suggest the oligarchs created a false choice between private capitalism and state-run capitalism via communism, and frankly, both of them suck to varying degrees. We should be able to do better.
I talk about thousands of decentralized 'nodal communities' wherein everyone owns a small piece of private property by law. A new education system focusing on food self-sufficiency and home building skills along with financial literacy. Such a society would have a very inexpensive health care system as the foundation of the structure would be built upon healthy ethics rather than pyramid and Ponzi schemes. The means of exchange would exist via public banking and the currency wouldn't have debt mechanisms attached to it.
Inflation would be minimal under such a structure and these communities have the potential to be sustainable over millennia. The capitalist economy could still exist but would be a luxury and commercial enterprise wherein humanity's four basic needs of homes, food, education, and healthcare are no longer at the mercy of predatory economics with its unsustainable inflation policies. I point out that inflation in the luxury/commercial economy would be no issue at all...
Please note again where I differ from Marx: private property is essential to the commons in these times. I also don't posit the violent overthrow of the oligarchs and I'm not trying to do the impossible: abolish capitalism. I'm saying that there have to be boundaries legislated into the system which prevent predatory behavior on humanity's basic needs...
Boarded up shops...Zombies soon to come. I guess I'm going to have to give up my apartment or find a roommate. Hmmm...who would be willing to do that I wonder:P