Its a demonstrable fact, not a belief and certainly not something I'm the least hung up on. You can be as sarcastic about the fact as you wish but the fact remains.

You said I omitted the law part of the police's purpose, when I've exemplified that the police and the slave catchers were established to do just that, and you used the term liberty to mean something outside it's defined meaning and abused its inherent meaning to the convoluted and interchangeably agreeable with laws definition, to the point that its demonstrated and logically sound, even more than your initial statement about liberty, that, making you an idiot and a hypocrite, tag onto it a liar, and this post is about as "anarchist baiting" as it gets, relying on emotions and your comments turning statement of fact into mere sentiments, the hypocrisy is possibly symptomatic of your own hate and prejudices against anarchists, the hypocrisy that laws need to be respected and then that we should not allow such a police state to form through legality.

And to dismiss my demonstration of your hypocrisy because you insinuate nuance without reason or methodology to back up your claim and argue repeatedly that we are at an impasse without, again, reasons or methodology for that claim and dismiss your prejudice and not address your prophetic knowledge as another bias, makes you a willful idiot.