To point out that we reach a divide by quoting me and not explain yourself one bit but hinting at NUANCE is a pathetic attempt at establishing your moral standing when you have none, you are a demonstrable idiot and a hypocrite:
You use Liberty and Law interchangeably,
In my perspective Law is the MEANS for the people to live and maintain themselves under Liberty.
See, DEMONSTRATED YOU ARE AN IDIOT.
The hypocrite comes out when you speak of the degree of not giving into Law and Liberty.
To conclude that there's nuance without any reason or method to back that claim up is the same thing as arguing that I have no moral integrity because I compared the slave catchers, their MO and being an established and state run function to the paroling police which differ immensely from the previous investigating detectives and are immensely similar in all aspects to their predecessors the slave catching patrols, and distorting that reality by claiming that they are different without any reason or method for such distinctions, and in the face of evidence to the contrary, while arguing that laws cannot be maintained without a body to enforce them, when I have pointed out that in the past detectives did that, the military and just about every function of the state itself minus the police, while other societies have lived under Rules and without masters, in complete anarchy for over two thousand years, negating any need to enforce laws.
Yup, I'm an idiot. Just believe that and move on with your life.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Its a demonstrable fact, not a belief and certainly not something I'm the least hung up on. You can be as sarcastic about the fact as you wish but the fact remains.
You said I omitted the law part of the police's purpose, when I've exemplified that the police and the slave catchers were established to do just that, and you used the term liberty to mean something outside it's defined meaning and abused its inherent meaning to the convoluted and interchangeably agreeable with laws definition, to the point that its demonstrated and logically sound, even more than your initial statement about liberty, that, making you an idiot and a hypocrite, tag onto it a liar, and this post is about as "anarchist baiting" as it gets, relying on emotions and your comments turning statement of fact into mere sentiments, the hypocrisy is possibly symptomatic of your own hate and prejudices against anarchists, the hypocrisy that laws need to be respected and then that we should not allow such a police state to form through legality.
And to dismiss my demonstration of your hypocrisy because you insinuate nuance without reason or methodology to back up your claim and argue repeatedly that we are at an impasse without, again, reasons or methodology for that claim and dismiss your prejudice and not address your prophetic knowledge as another bias, makes you a willful idiot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you haven't seen it yet. Here
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit