Are we really with the certainty of that something that we almost always defend?
It is difficult to contrast truths when everyone defends them based on their truth, is the truth that is understandable to each reality, to be able to enter a process of contradiction or affirmation being outside a context of realities outside of that supposed truth is necessary to enter in the most deliberative features of the common sense of feeling, thinking and reasoning human.
It would also be necessary to analyze the individual who defends this truth analyzing the features on which he bases that certainty that he has of what is considered his truth, are social, psychological, intelligence and abilities that can be based and detected in his being, to go giving credible indications of its truth and that in turn will be an initial work before an end of announced verdict.
How is an informed certainty acquired?
The first thing to be clear is to try to defend something as honestly credible, so that something is credible must be based in my opinion on certain degrees of repression or an unfair contradiction of external factors such as a society that believes to be just right and can discriminate a subject by events that are classic in everyday life, but that the individual with his arguments if he knows that he has the certainty of a truth founded.
It is necessary to mention and mention before you, steemians friend, that certainty is a term that always has to handle with humility the being that wants to defend its truth, since as we defend it with more arrogance, less credibility of the defense we have, It is for this reason that in this reflection I speak of "certainty". To have that certainty of the truth that we defend is to enter the first signs of our defense in a humble way without losing the sense that it is credible.
From my perspectives certainty includes certain factors to consider, among these:
Knowing how to distinguish between the existence of certainty and the foundations that lie within it.
Know how to distinguish the way in which we acquire certainty, taking into account that the existence of certainty is an indisputable fact.
To understand a little more of the certainty, I will place the following example:
The knowledge that mass and bodies exist in the universe is a fact that no one doubts. All this leads to say that on this point there is no one in this world that vacillates on the deep conviction that around us there is a material world, which confirms that it is a phenomenon of our existence, that perhaps it can not be right in its explanation, but that at the same time destroy the bases of its existence is something impossible, since we are subject to it as an irreversible necessity in its own decline of its existence.
Our way of thinking must begin with the explanation of the existence of the same being, and not so much for the certainty of trivial convictions, reasons that are not based on anything, but that if we start with our own essence, surely we will reach our own convictions. of reasonable certainties.