Logical Fallacies - And how to win/lose an argument

in philosophy •  7 years ago 

So what are logical fallacies anyways?

Logical fallacies are just forms of flawed reasoning. They can be obvious or subtle. They're often disguised as reasonable claims, which means that detecting them takes practice. So lets get into some examples of logical fallacies.

The Ad Hominem

The Ad Hominem is probably the most common Fallacy. The Latin term ad hominem means "against the man." It refers to an attack on the person rather than on the argument or the issue. The assumption here is that if the speaker proves unacceptable in some way, his or her statements must also be judged unacceptable. It's a form of character assassination. It happens when sticks to the issue at hand takes too much energy or integrity.

Obvious Examples

  • Name calling
  • Racial slurs
  • Politically motivated insults
  • Gender defamation
  • Religious attacks
  • Any other form of character assassination one can imagine.

Subtle Examples

  • Someone might complain, "what can the priest tell us about marriage? He's never been married himself."
    a) This accusation ignores the validity of the advice the priest might offer.
    b) Since 40 to 50 percent of married couples in the United States divorce, people who do get married shouldn't be judging priests

The Hasty Generalization

An inductive fallacy, which means drawing a conclusion based on too little data.

Examples

  • Stereotyping
  • "I once met a Harvard professor who was very cold and arrogant. Therefore, all Harvard professors are very cold and arrogant."
  • Superstition
  • "If you stare into a mirror for too long, the mirror will capture your soul."
  • "Everything happens for a reason."

The False Dicotomy

Incorrectly thinking that a choice can made based on only one of two options when, in fact, alternative possibilites exist.

Example

  • The Hawks and Doves during the Vietnam War
  • The Hawks said, "America, love it or leave it." The subtext here is that if you don't support the Vietnam War, then you don't love America, and therefore you should leave. Its hard to imagine a more unamerican statement given that the 1st Amentment defends the freedom of speech.
  • The Doves said, "Soldiers are war-mongering baby-killers." This was not true. In fact 40% of the soldiers were drafted in the first place. The rest probably thought it was their duty to fight for their country.

Begging the Question

There is no point in arguing a fact. In begging the question, the arguer attempts to present their opinion as proven fact.

Example

  • "Harold Coleman is clearly guilty of embezzlement, so why bother with a trial?"

The Faulty Analogy

Comparing two things that don't share a fundamental similarity.

Example

  • "If we ban guns, then we might as well ban knives." Regardless of your standpoint on guns, guns were made to kill, while knives are used a tool to make food.

The Slippery Slope

In slippery slope reasoning, the arguer starts off with a sinlge condition, takes a stand against it, and uses as support the notion that other, worse things will happen if the first condition is allowed to exist.

Example

  • "If we allow this, the sky will fall, the world will end, and we will all be zombies after the apocolypse.

Alright. So whats the point of all this?

Now that I've given you some examples, I am going to tell you how you can use or misuse Logical Fallacies. Logical Fallacies can be used to win an argument. They are most often used by politicians. However, you risk looking stupid in front of whoever you are having discourse with. In general, Logical Fallacies are often seen as a scumy way to win an argument. Often it is better to avoid them at all costs, least you get shut down and shamed for using them.

I hope you enjoyed reading!


Let me know if you resteem for a 100% upvote!
- @edolo
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thanks for sharing this, i've learnt a thing or two. Most common one is when people abandon the argument and attack the personalty

also thanks for the #resteem

thanks man! It took some work to put this post together, so I appreciate the support!

Interesting because the ability to argue against a politician is difficult they grow learning it and we see it always in politics. That in the end we don't know how they get away with it.

yes. Their job is arguing and maintaining appearances

That's right.

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

thanks man! means a lot!

Really that's great about to know

thanks man!

very interesting information, success continued @edolo.

Thanks man, very educational. :)

thanks! @acedawnmusic Glad you enjoyed!

Great article. Politicians and political rhetoric now a days lacks virtue and so is ripe with logical fallacy.

The question is, why is nature logical? Where does this logic ultimately find its anchor? In my view, the nature of God. Within the nature of God you can find the archetypes of logic and mathematical truths. They are natural representations of the way God thinks.

Christianity makes sense of the intelligibility of nature because of the intelligible nature of the creator.

Thanks for the comment.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

BTW, I appreciate the article. Important topic in this world ;)

thanks man.

This post has received a 0.63 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @banjo.

thanks @banjo @drotto

But you are the only one that believes to me.

wat

Do you think about the meaning of life?

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

hush banjo. Nobody cares lol

Tell me something philosophic.

Then why do you speak about it!!

@minnowpond1 has voted on behalf of @minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowpond on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond. To be Resteemed to 4k+ followers and upvoted heavier send 0.25SBD to @minnowpond with your posts url as the memo

thanks @minnowpond1

Calling @originalworks :)
img credz: pixabay.com
Nice, you got a $4.83 @minnowbooster upgoat, thanks to @edolo
Want a boost? Minnowbooster's got your back!

nice!

The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @edolo to be original material and upvoted it!

ezgif.com-resize.gif

To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!

To enter this post into the daily RESTEEM contest, upvote this comment! The user with the most upvotes on their @OriginalWorks comment will win!

For more information, Click Here!
Special thanks to @reggaemuffin for being a supporter! Vote him as a witness to help make Steemit a better place!

This wonderful post has received a bellyrub 5.97 % upvote from @bellyrub thanks to this cool cat: @edolo. My pops @zeartul is one of your top steemit witness, if you like my bellyrubs please go vote for him, if you love what he is doing vote for this comment as well.

thanks @bellyrub

good post..........................

thanks

great job!

I decided this post is going to prove invaluable for when I am writing, so I wanted to resteem. There is no resteem button - maybe because I just did so for your '18 upvote' post? Will it come back later? Anyway, at least I was able to follow.

As for a comment on your points: I think that even those of us who try to be honest in our arguments/debates, sometimes slip up and use one form or the other. It makes your post even more valuable, for it might help us recognise what we are doing.

  • Had to edit to add this comment, otherwise my first sentence might not make sense. When I write, there usually is a bad guy - or woman. I find it easy to write for the good ones, but find it difficult to make the bad guy bad, so they often turn out to have been good all along, maybe just hurting, and so on. At least I might now have a few formulas for making them sound more bad...for a while.

thanks for your reply. Im pretty sure you cant resteem because its past the 7 day mark. Anyways thanks for reading @arthur.grafo