RE: Why pro-choice is logically inconsistent

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Why pro-choice is logically inconsistent

in philosophy •  7 years ago 

i constructed this case to illustrate that when the pregnant want the baby, she regards the baby as a human bein. but when she doesn't want the baby, she does not regard the baby as a human being.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Well of course she regards a wanted baby as a human living being. It is called emotions and if there is one thing, that makes people act illogical is emotion. Could you blame her? This also works the other way around, to convice yourself that the unborn is not a human being yet, if you don't want to put up with a child for whatever reason. (i.E not being able to support a child, having emotional traume...) Could you blame her?
All in all people are great to convince themself of anything and therefore such constructed cases shouldn't be used as dismissing those people and their positions as illogical, if you want to be taken seriously in a debate about a moral conflict.