Freedom and Bad Faith: The Myths We Live In

in philosophy •  8 years ago  (edited)

17792291_10212661930373521_2086980357_n.jpg

Albert Camus once wrote that Freedom is nothing but the chance to do better. This quote has stuck with me for a very long time and I find myself often reflecting on what this little nugget of wisdom specifically means and more aptly, how it applies to our contemporary context. Better? Are we doing better? Are we embracing and embodying our supposed and innate radical freedom?

Lately, a quick peruse of the news and/or social media suggests that we, most certainly, are not. This realization (and terror) has led me to consider yet another Existentialist philosopher (Jean Paul-Sartre) and his idea of something called bad faith. Sartre describes bad faith as (please note I am loosely paraphrasing here from Being and Nothingness) as a human tendency in which we use our freedom to, in fact, deny our freedom. I wonder what William Wallace would make of that, huh? You can take my life..... but you'll never take my flat screen TV and pumpkin spice latte…..maybe?!? I don’t know. Do these seemingly simple choices appear that dire or important? I would argue that they are paramount to our continued existence and directly shape the kind of lives we are able to live and aspire to. Bad faith, yeah it’s a thing. It’s an insidious thing that sucks the spirit of humankind dry and enables us to continue to live in the myth of consumerism we have become so comfortably acclimated to.

To deny our own freedom seems to be a highly contentious and counterproductive activity, doesn’t it? We really don’t deceive ourselves, do we? But (“but” is really just an acronym for the “bare underlying truth”) we do this all the time and practice self-deception like a well-honed religion. We deceive ourselves in a myriad of ways on a daily basis with ease and without much effort. Radical freedom is the idea that we can always choose differently. No, this does not imply that we can always control and/or predict our social, political, and economical spheres but we can ALWAYS choose how we react to them or better yet, how we counteract them. We practice self-deception every time we don’t think we have an option in what we buy, what we read, what we watch and even down to what we eat. We choose everyday to either embrace our freedom and/or negate it. I guess the most profound question we can answer in our quest for living well boils down to this: What will I choose?

“Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does.” Jean-Paul Sartre

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

The middle name of my VW Camper Van is Freedom.

That is one sweet looking camper!! Freeeeeeeeddddddddoooooooommmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:)

She has fridge, stove, pop up top and sleeps four and propane central heating. Fits in a city parking spot and fits in underground parking. Little four cylinder is good on petro.

Sounds like you are completely set for an adventure. It sounds like a dream come true! Kudos!!

Thx, I fell in love with Jenny my VW. She came in unbelievable shape and I am upgrading everything to state of the art like solar big time...and of course put 12 speakers in her! My son has ordered rows and rows of LED lights. I scored a burning man ticket so gonna hang out with 50 other VW's there in Sept then off to Florida with my VW bus named Jenny and the freedom she represents. Will try it for the winter and if I like it maybe 2 or 3 winters.

Ha ha! That's what Scottish Bravehearts shout! A very interesting article worthy of $'s :) I love the starter quote ... it really pulls you in!! :)

Camus has that affect....

Just a tip on tags Kobie - do add more! Look at one of my philosophy posts and copy my tags as they are finely tuned to all the major tags on here - as well as your own particular tags of course! Max em' out for maximum Steemit coverage :)

Thank you! That is very helpful.

Max the tags, max the audience :) We both want to touch as many people as we can on here with our philosophy ;)

True. Thanks for being attentive to my writing

P.S. This post is my Resteem of the day :) May many more $'s flow to it :))

@mindhunter Thank you very much. I saw your video on supporting and attracting more women to Steemit and it is nice to see your words hold weight. I appreciate the helpful tips, sharing of articles and the philosophical banter. I think at this point in my life, after having and leaving a lucrative career to study philosophy I'd settle for someone to just read my stuff, turn off the TV, go for a walk and be kinder to their neighbours. Studying philosophy shook my core and changed how I see the world and most importantly how I see myself. It gave me a language to talk about things that matter to me and as I discovered have mattered through out history. I mostly want to pass that gift on to others but to do that you need a certain amount of recognition and influence so people pay attention. There are no Machiavellian intentions with my writing. I only seek to live better and it seems being in the world with others implies that I have to be concerned with how others live too. I seek excellence as a habit much how Aristotle talked about in his Nicomachean Ethics. We are after all, social and political animals. When we choose .....we choose for everyone, right? BTW, I am very envious of your travels.

Final thought: You posted something about if you could quit your job and travel would you? I would leave my job in a heart beat if I could support myself off grid, walk everyday and do pottery and knit. As much as I love the idea of travel I would love a home I didn't feel the need to take a vacation from.

I know in my life that my philosophy has been large enough to save someone's life - including my own ;) Through Steemit we can save many more lives from despair.

BTW I have topic idea for you ... 'If you could teach the world one thing based on your own philosophy experiences, what would it be?' ... now there is a post idea with your name written on it :)

I shall ponder it and see what I can come up.

Just an idea I had to keep ya Steeming!! :)

Recent life experiences have silenced me in some aspects and I had become accustomed to not being listened to. I guess the saying holds true (I'm probably not stating this accurately): speak the truth even if your voice shakes. The right people will find you and be all too willing to listen at least this is part of what I would include in my version of Quest Physics. I borrowed that term from Eat, Pray, Love as Elizabeth Gilbert likely has the best version to date: “I've come to believe that there exists in the universe something I call "The Physics of The Quest" — a force of nature governed by laws as real as the laws of gravity or momentum. And the rule of Quest Physics maybe goes like this: "If you are brave enough to leave behind everything familiar and comforting (which can be anything from your house to your bitter old resentments) and set out on a truth-seeking journey (either externally or internally), and if you are truly willing to regard everything that happens to you on that journey as a clue, and if you accept everyone you meet along the way as a teacher, and if you are prepared – most of all – to face (and forgive) some very difficult realities about yourself... then truth will not be withheld from you." Or so I've come to believe.”

My life is a permanent truth-seeking journey just like @knozaki2015 and @heiditravels on here ... and the truth shall set your free :)

P.S. Post idea #2: Which philosopher from history would probably gain the biggest following on Steemit today? For me: Socrates ;)

I have not forgotten but I am one of those people who are slow processors. i like to think my way through things.

Logic over emotion ;)

Trust me. The emotion is still there. Slowing things down is for everyone's safety. Haha. I am a Leo with a Scorpio rising (its a lot of a lot). BTW, its 4:40 am here...sigh

Really interesting post. thank you for sharing.

I guess the most profound question we can answer in our quest for living well boils down to this: What will I choose?

This seems to only refer to personal agency though.It rests on the assumption that an individual has the ability (freedom/Control/ Free will) to consciously make reasonable decisions. I personally think a more interesting question would be "What will I choose, and what am I allowing to be chosen for me". (As a result of environmental influences like genetics, culture, and various reinforcers and punishments as suggested by behaviourists like BF Skinner).
quick overview on freewill and determinism here
That's something that I am constantly trying to unravel in my own decision making.

but we can ALWAYS choose how we react to them

I mostly agree with this. But again, my personal struggle/fascination in this area is not with making a choice. It's understanding the motivations and mechanisms that informed that choice.

Again, thanks for sharing. I really enjoyed your post.

Hello @schro. I guess I would include culture, genetics and behaviourists into the same box as bad faith. in fact, I would question if they are not one in the same thing. We may for example have a predisposition to diabetes, high blood pressure or particular types of skin cancers but that does collapse into a guarantee that to spite right eating and a healthy lifestyle that we cannot on some level combat these illnesses. There are some studies that suggest that our attitudes and perspectives towards these illnesses can actually prevent and improve these things. The placebo effect for example is well documented within the medical community and there seems to be fairly good indicators that a positive outlook does do wonders for cancer survivor's remission and recovery rates.

Culture is a particular thing that perpetuates bad faith. Often if we take norms, rules and regulations are natural and given we really do not engage them on any meaningful level. If we throw our hands up and simply exclaim: " Well, that is just the way it is.", this implies a static and eternal force to things we create in the first place. Meaning these ways of being in the world have been created and perpetuated from some place. We didn't always live as we do now nor will we continue to. Thus I think we can imagine and see a different way of being. If we can imagine it well then it becomes something like an "adjacent possible". Surely if we have come culturally from some place we can also undo or redo that culture in another form.

I think behaviourists can maybe predict patterns of behaviour but again what makes a man run into a burning building in spite of certain harm and death to oneself? If we take the current human narrative as an accurate testament then we would think that we are only self-interested organisms striving to maximize survival and reproduction. Patterns are just that but as nature and science often show us , sure, patterns do exist, that's a given but also so do exceptions and anomalies.

Finally, I would argue that engaging motivations and mechanisms for making a particular choice is engaging, questioning and challenging those embedded tendencies of bad faith. Bad faith is refusing to use our freedom to weigh and consider all these things and affirm that we cannot choose to act or behave beyond them. Given, you might not make a good choice or correct choice but bad faith results in denying that freedom to make a fundamental choice. It does not imply that ideal or optimal choices will be available merely that we can choose differently.

Wait a minute, you mean I have a choice between buying those Brussel Sprouts and eating healthy OR buying a Quarter Pounder with cheese, fries and a shake??? Nonsense! They put a gun to my head and MADE me buy that food, and support that industry, and perpetuate a completely unsustainable and unhealthy culture, and get cancer, and teach my children my bad habits! Freedom, what rubbish. The TV won't let me be free, and I have no choice but to watch that too.

@deanclifford It would appear so. Lately I wonder if I would be happier if I stopped asking myself what would Socrates do and instead ask: What would Grimace (Grimace is still a thing, isn't he?)or the Hamburglar do? Or even those weird fry person things?? I don't know. Maybe the idea of radical freedom is just an elaborate hoax and yet another scam? But I do have a sneaking suspicion that perhaps this is more correct: “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the fool, or the pig, are of a different opinion, it is because they only know their own side of the question. The other party to the comparison knows both sides” (Utilitarianism, Mill)

Great post!

Aww... thank you very much!!

This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Apr 09. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $0.19 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Apr 09 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

wow! those are some BIG blue eyes you got there

They serve me well, I rarely bump into things. ;)