Nobody is trying to monopolize art. The typical wish is at least that the art created by them is not used for commercial use without a permission.
Art isn't being monopolized. Anyone can create art if they want without being attacked by artists.
RE: Let's talk about: Copyright
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Let's talk about: Copyright
You've said that nobody wants to monopolize art and then expressed exactly what monopolizing art is, you do understand that and then went to deny that there is any monopolization happening right after and asauge my "worry" that art is monopolized.
Art is monopolized, the act of Permitting only some people or only some uses of ideas is monopolization itself, it's the very act itself that you deny is not happening.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No, I am talking about monopolizing in the sense of copyrights as the inherent function that copyrights have. You understand that monopolizing ideas is at the heart of copyright then you understand it makes no difference if the idea is practical or artistic a million or one, because abstractions being monopolized by individuals is a clear determent to society and has not demonstrated that it indeed helps the artist, inventor or creator, in fact it has demonstrated the opposite while where people don't have copyright competition happens naturally, and artist in turn are compensated better, as there are better ways to get compensated than by telling people what they can and cannot express, which infringes upon freedom of expression.
Hoarding ideas has slowed down the industrial revolution by decades, it has slowed down the age of enlightenment at the same time and because it's repugnant to reason to consider what can be shared without any effort to multitudes of people, as a tangible thing which is bound to scarcity and not the world of abstractions, it's always been built on fantastic constructions that equate Copying to Stealing.
If you try to stop me with all the tools you have, you have better register your work because you won't stop me, and even then I will simply send them a Special and Restricted Appearance when summoned telling them that they have no juristiction and to send me the performance bid bond that has been placed to my address and if there was none to investigate the prosecuting attorney and fine him if it's found that he filed the claim/complaint without posting a bond. I'll be sitting pretty on Land while you are in the Water wasting your time trying to get me to join you in your petty complaint, instead of making more art and being careful about sharing it before you monetize it, because it won't matter if I copy non stop, you won't find a jury of 12 to try me and there won't be a trial because you cannot demonstrate an injury that Man can be prosecuted for. Due process is a motherfucker.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you can demonstrate what you are saying in a verifiable and logically cogent clear way I will give you my account.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Echo echo echo echo:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If it's copyrighted then someone does indeed CLAIM legal monopoly on the idea, if you understand what that means.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Haha.
Are you here just to spew all kinds of gibberish without any contact to the reality?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Without any contact to the reality?
GO look up wikipedia Monopoly. It says this:
If you follow through and aren't a complete idiot, to Government-Granted monopoly (the hyperlink is built into the article, idiot)
Contact to "the" reality? You're here denying that there's no monopolizing on ideas when that is exactly what it is described as and that is not some exaggeration however mild because by function, or in other words HOW IT WORKS (idiot) is by exclusive right, which in the sense of exclusive right over making money from an idea is EXACTLY (idiot, there is no argument or interpretation or misunderstanding, it's an interchangeable context) what MONOPOLIZING (the FUNCTION) MEANS (DEFINITION, MEANING).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you can demonstrate why and how that is gibberish without any contact to reality I will give you my account, this is the third time I challenged you. Tell me again how copyrighting isn't monopolizing on an idea.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Are you talking about copyright law of a single, specific country?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually, I am talking about the idea of exclusivity over reproducing an idea or copying it, or Monopolizing the copying of an idea you idiot. It's the same in every country where those Exclusive Rights are granted- State Granted Monopoly BY definition, as exclusive rights is exactly what Monopoly Means.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Idiot. Lmao.
There's no monopolizing on an Idea: it's only that I can hunt you down legally for infringing on my exclusive right to make money off MY idea. (claiming to own ideas. good one, lots of thought and reasons :I made it, it's mine, you cannot use it! .. why? loololoolol)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hahaha @Xposed the sham of "Let's talk about copyrighs" where it's really by their own admission "Let me tell you about copyrights"/ FAIL
Join in the
Idiot that thinks monopolizing on an idea is not exclusive rights to profit from it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Do you understand what Monopolizing ideas means? It's the definition of copyright, it's how copyright functions more precisely. So when you judge something dumb without even understanding the basic function of copyrights in clear terms:
It's as valid as any other errenous opinion or belief.
If you create art that depicts an eagle with the head of an elephant, copyrighting means that anyone who make something that can be considered COPYING the idea, be it in the same medium or an entirely different one all together, you can attempt to subjugate their real property rights.
A rant btw is your logical inconsistent judgmeent of what you think I am doing, which is not "crying" anymore than it is "ranting", but making Salient points and speaking in a logical consistency with clarity and specificity and to avail understanding, there was nothing that could be construed as emotional response or incitement in my arguments.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you can demonstrate that I am logically inconsistent I will give you my account.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are. I have not been talking about monopolizing ideas, but you are claiming I have done.
We can discuss how you will hand over your password to me later on.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's actually the very essence of saying that only you can make money from an idea. That's why it's called a Government-Granted-Monopoly. We have been talking about the same exact thing from the beginning, you only sought to deny it without substance, then re-asserted it in the same comment, as the quote above demonstrates. Logic you idiot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Maybe if you could have explained How and Why we were talking about two different things and how and why it makes my arguments logically inconsistent as if my arguments somehow are predicated on your misunderstanding, confusion: ie demonstrate, instead of assert nonsense or plain lies, as if the conversation EVER changed from talking about monopolizing ideas, as if denying monopolizing of ideas in the begining of your comment without any logic, reason, or substance, while asserting it in the concluding thought without any logic, reason(pettiness?) or substance, is not talking about monopolizing on ideas.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exclusive Control is Monopolizing, Idiot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Wow, so you are actually just stupid. I wasn't talking about complete power.
So you're just talking BS, claiming I'm talking about stuff I'm not talking about and calling me an idiot.
Congratulations on upvoting your own comments while doing so.
You are very special person and I can see that.
Extremely special.
You must feel proud of yourself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Why would I feel proud of myself if what you say is true?
But the important question is When, why and how did you think that you weren't talking about "complete power" or whatever that means? It's not complete power to make money from an idea is it? LOLOL!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
IDIOT, we never stopped talking about complete power, excusive control over monetizing an idea. You might consider your unsubstantiated claims as actually steering the conversation outside what you responded to and what you "thought" you responded to, but the fact remains, you responded to me, not I to you, and you entered into the conversation on the assumption that you understood the most basic definition of what you were arguing, which you did not: STATE GRANTED MONOPOLY.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Aka Exclusive Control over an Idea.
idiot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, yes you are.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah somehow we stopped talking about Monopolizing, as in to have exclusive control over making money from an idea. Nobody is doing that though Right? Fail you
IDIOT
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I never even started to talk about that. You did and you keep on claiming I did.
You're sad. Claiming I'm an idiot won't make me one.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
AKA Monopolizing ideas. Idiot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No it's not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually using a State Granted Monopoly to have exclusive control over ideas and monetizing them is what I mean when I say monopolizing, and what the definition of monopolizing means in the context of exclusive control over profiting from ideas. Denying that exclusive control isn't monopolizing on ideas is denying the very definition of the word monopolizing and the very function by which copyright works.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Trying to use the State Granted Monopoly to Monopolize on people making money off ideas that you claim as exclusive to yourself is immoral and it has no semblance of a basis in logic. To deny that you were talking about State Granted Monopoly to Monopolize on making money off art is counter to any sense attached to the words above. That quote above is definitive proof that you were talking about what I was talking about: monopolizing on ideas, I don't need to Claim anything, it's Evident to all who have the slightest sense. How was that challange again? Idiot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No it's not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually using a State Granted Monopoly to have exclusive control over ideas and monetizing them is what I mean when I say monopolizing, and what the definition of monopolizing means in the context of exclusive control over profiting from ideas. Denying that exclusive control isn't monopolizing on ideas is denying the very definition of the word monopolizing and the very function by which copyright works.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@tamwin33
So that person is another Nobody?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Wow, this is just plain sad.
Nope and nope.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nope what Idiot, cannot form a proper sentence and explain what you're denying and why? "I'm not an idiot simply because you say so" No need, you are as you act.
Nope and nope, "Plain sad", Ok.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I never even started to talk about that. You did and you keep on claiming I did.
You're sad. Claiming I'm an idiot won't make me one.
You're a liar and an idiot, or maybe only an idiot, THE idiot but I give you more intellignce than that and raise you a Liar as well.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Idiot, when you claim exclusive Control over an idea, as not allowing people to monetize it, you are monopolizing the idea idiot. That's a fact of life. Read "Government-Granted-Monopolies". How hard is that to get through your thicknelson.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I haven't been even talking about claiming exclusive control about ideas. It's been you all along.
Are your parents closely related or why you have so special way to think?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As Counter to:
Except that you didn't say nobody can copy "art" without being attacked by the artists. Ie Monopolizing over the idea, when did you think we stopped talking about Monopolizing ideas? The moment you responded and denied that monopolizing over ideas happens? The conversation doesn't change simply because you entered into it without any substance what so ever besides a denial that monopolizing over ideas happens.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Still no. You're still talking just dumb shit and as I can see you're upvoting your posts, I'm using my power to flag it because this was special level of stupid.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you can prove it was a "special level of stupid" I will give you my account, no if you cannot even.
Thank you for explaining anything btw Idiot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit