★Professional vs. Amateur: 10 Photos of The Same Tourist Attraction Places That Are becomes So Different!★

Hi Steemians,
Today, more and more interesting attractions are gaining in popularity. Interestingly, the popularity of the tourist attraction is not separated from the creative hands of photographers who concoct a normal tourist attraction becomes extraordinarily beautiful and aesthetically pleasing.

Unfortunately, when beginners who lack the skills also photographed the same tourist attraction, the results sometimes not as good as the shots of photographers or camera expert. Summarized from the source IDNTimes, here we will present some photos that prove the difference between expert and beginner shots even though the object is the same. Let's see:

#1. Eiffel Tower, Paris.

The different styles of photographing beginners and professionals are evident in this photo. If the pro photographer can take the aesthetic side of the Eifel tower in Paris though the point of view from the bottom of the tower, while the beginner photo (right) point of view is too mainstream i.e. from the front to see all the objects of the Eiffel tower.

---

#2. The Cyclades, Yunani

The left is a pro photographer shots that emphasize the composition of objects and sources for lighting. While the right is the amateur in the same location shots but from different angles. Which one do you like?

---

#3. Plaza de España, Seville from Spain.

Though the location is the same, but these two photos looks so like one photographed in the present and another photographed in the future. Can be distinguished where the shots of pro photographers and beginners?

---

#4. Taj Mahal, India.

If you like which photos? Left with the composition fitting and color texture of the interesting or right that appears from the photo because the composition is not too good?

---

#5. Rakotzbrücke, Gablenz in Germany

Actually the object of this photo is the same that Rakotzbrücke, Gablenz in Germany. But see for yourself, the left of expert shots that give priority to the composition of the object. While the right, just take the snap that make the results so aesthetically.

---

#6. Blue Lagoon, Islandia.

Hot water pool only if the point of view is different, the picture was so much different. More aesthetically which one?

---

#7. Geiranger, Norwegia.

Do you think more aesthetically which photo results? To the left or right?

---

#8. Waterfalls Chamarel, Mauritius.

It seems that the difference between the shots pro photographer and beginner. Which one do you like?

---

#9. Machu Picchu, Peru.

The difference is the result of the photo level with the results of the photos that are prepared to make Instagram feed so more aesthetically can be seen from the photo above?

---

#10. The Wave, Colorado Plateau in the United States.

It looks really different where the shots of pro photographer and beginner. Photos of "The Wave", Colorado Plateau on the left so as on the planet Mars. What a difference with the right!

---

---

photo source: idntimes

---

---

Well, that's just a few pieces of photographic images of the difference from the shots of pro photographers and amateurs. Very visible difference, where the pro photograper using all facilities and features that exist in the camera and find the time and the right atmosphere (according to the theme) in taking photos. So that the camera shots were so very beautiful and aesthetic, unlike the amateurs. The only origin of the snap alone regardless of time and atmosphere and not function of the features that exist in the camera. That's why, the shots are very ordinary. Ok guys, see you in the next post. Have a nice day and good luck to you.

---

---

Thanks for visited & upvoted my post
don't forget to vote, reblog & follow me @ardian27

---

---