In this video we look at reports within HM2, we try to identify if mass multi-tabling is more or less efficient to our poker income. Theoretically our win rate should decrease with the more tables we play, since our decision making and attention is spread more thin. Let's try to prove or disprove this theory.
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
have you looked at rake. How much rake are u paying vs your winnings? In other words what is you effective rake.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Everything in HM2 is after rake. I just make sure that I'm not paying outrageous rake rates. ACR has a 5% rake with $3 max at 5 to 9 players dealt into hands, less rake with less players. Last year my VIP Program (points/bonuses/tourney bucks) was approx $7-8K which should be about 32% of rake... So just by approximation rake paid last year would be about $14-16K. ACR must love the multi-tabling regs. lol
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I actually did find the rake report in HM2. Paid about $12K in effective rake in a little over a year. I just stumbled onto a myriad of reports I didn't know about. ha! Thanks for the comment and watching the videos!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit