Your "Natural law" and "Spontanious order" should have an origine, or if you prefere more the Author who will write those law's and orders.
They cannot produce themself based on a spontanious behaviour of the people. Considering the fact that "Spontanious" order of some rapist or a pedophile is to rape, then this rapist is led by his " Natural law" which for him is just a freedom of acting and living his way. If you want to create a healthy society where the freedom, justice, morality and ethics wouldn't cause No harm to Anyone, then you need a system that is written by people with real virtues. And again, maybe grammaticaly incorrect but i think moraly very correct.
RE: "That Guy's" Response to Robert Kiyosaki of Rich Dad/Poor Dad on Anarcho-Capitalism
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
"That Guy's" Response to Robert Kiyosaki of Rich Dad/Poor Dad on Anarcho-Capitalism
I don't think any anarchists are against punishing evil-doers - in fact, private security agencies would do a better job than police.
You need to understand: Anarchy means 'no rulers', not 'no rules'.
This idea that we're safer because of government is sillier than believing in Santa Claus.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Natural Law just means that humans have rights and morals inherent to their humanity that can be found through human reasoning. Spontaneous Order just means order that comes about without planning and enforcement from governments. You should look these terms up online and learn about them before suggesting anything about them or the nature of human morality. Then you can form a better opinion to offer on how to improve the human condition.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit