RE: Socialism will Never Work

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Socialism will Never Work

in politics •  8 years ago 

It seem like nothing will ever work with only negative point of view and no constructive answers offered. Every system on earth till today is flawed. Even in US where democracy turn into a vote on unpopularity for presidential election. Trade across border had change many aspect of over international interaction and no one will get 0 negative news or critics over any system be it democracy, communism or socialism etc. It no longer about what type of system work best but under what system can people benefit most. Singapore had been criticise as being a dictaorship even thou it had a democratic election because it had less freedom that majority people don't mind giving up for security and prosperity. Today US is talk about being Divided States of America after being one of the democratic society. China communist style thou still need improvement in human rights issue but managed to bring millions out of poverty no one can deny. Socialism causing welfare bankruptcy is no fault of the system but of politicians using it to buy vote where free stuffs get over paid in unsustainable policies. Now it reach the max and tried use basic income to solve the issue once and for all with another good policy tool but poorly planned system to gain new votes. I hope its the 1% of the poor that can be called liar this article refer to as majority are labor exploited in poverty or low income range that never had the time to be on social media to even defend themselves. After poisoning the middle income with individualism or freedom to keep them diversified from the lowest income range, they will continue to get pressurized into admiting it's their fault for being poor.

The 1% won't get far in this century if they don't realize it's not them the world need but those labourers who are also the consumers that they need increase their income/spending power to create new markets and economy. The vocal lower half in developed countries are already voicing out strongly self interest but its the millions in developing or third world countries facing daily starvation, slavery, poor living conditions that deserve real sympathy. Even those living off the grid how many can 100% confident determine that every food, products they use or wear does not involve people living less than $2 a day as part of the labor.

Human will only progress further under a fully open transparent system regardless of political belief as controls can always be in place to ensure accountability. There isn't a need to ask for full support from whole population but unification of the 50% lower half will be sufficient to be a force the 1% can't ignore or need anti supporters vote to change government policies. Funding can be through social business fully owned by the people will to join and managed by professional like trust mangers. The MNCs can get AI or automation to replace workers but those robots can't spend to line their pocket if there is 50% lower income population choose to support their group on their own, in their own economy.

More details can be found on the Global Universal System I still researching https://plus.google.com/collection/QPUllB I hope more writers can contribute in giving constructive solutions like mine or help me improvise with feedbacks instead of just giving the worst critics and left every readers thinking whats next then.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

The 1% won't get far in this century if they don't realize it's not them the world need but those labourers who are also the consumers that they need increase their income/spending power to create new markets and economy. The vocal lower half in developed countries are already voicing out strongly self interest but its the millions in developing or third world countries facing daily starvation, slavery, poor living conditions that deserve real sympathy. Even those living off the grid how many can 100% confident determine that every food, products they use or wear does not involve people living less than $2 a day as part of the labor.

I agree that the 1% is reckless, but the problem is not with them. Its with the system and how it's setup.

The moment you cant reason with humans, that moment you have lost the rational debate. You can sit down and reason with any hedge fund manager. But how do you sit down and reason with masses of poor people who are filled with anger and envy toward the rich. They would easily become hotheaded and start to initiate violence.

It's not like you can explain to people why minimum wage doesn't work, and why taxes are making everyone poorer. They just want to feed their family and dont care about a rational economic discussion.

This is the problem, this is the entire problem. This is why demagogues rise to power, they controll the masses , not through rational arguments, but through incitement to violence.

Hitler, Lenin, all of them, have played the masses through emotional manipulation. And how do you propose to solve the problem when these people can't be reasoned with?

It's like trying to reason with an angry bull that is charging toward you. How?

The 1% are only part of the problems who influenced most of the corrupted system. That's why they need new scheme of donating 99% of wealth to hide their wealth and prevent further public outrage. Only if the fund managers are selected randomly in 100s or 1000s like juries then I believe they are really that charitable and not just evading taxes.

God only stand on the side with the bigger cannons. As much as I would like to believe man are born good and they should live freely without any restriction (the only tribe I know is the sentinelese that have no written law or constitution etc to rule them, even thou India claim their island) Human are intelligent beings but also extremely probe to emotionally incitement like you said. In this current world we just need list the fact and figure and set in the threshold when certain number is exceeded, the degree of punishment will rise automatically like the stock exchange.

People protest and riot is only because the petitions are useless and legal procedures too long are not enough to get them basic justice. An angry bull charging is a rare event to me because I won't go to attend any of Spain bull run and if it's humans I dealing with, either suppress them or kill them in self-defence. I won't be Jesus waiting to be crucified because there might be a mob and I as a planner don't have the foresight to anticipate such events.

Every system on earth is already complicated enough with all pro and con well debated over the centuries but the stupidity is to think one system can only exist on one principle. Good intent policies/actions are all covered by hyprocrisy of politicians to the maximum extent that Iraq war can still go unpunished till today. Not surprise rise of trump or durtuete type of speech can only make people feel more secured than hate them if they even had time to think properly. The faults are mainly in the financial and legal system, not the lack of solutions. When the cases of injustice piled up like those rich and powerful getting away too often then I rather use the guilty till proven innocence approach when you don't see once in a century type of case anymore. The school killings, bank frauds, rapes get unpunished, etc all sort of new crimes that sometimes went out of the legal coverage especially in IT advancement or even scientific range. Solutions are simple and it's not new tech close to driver-less car required but implementation is always stuck at legistrative or government bodies.

Find me a person that after so long that trade had cross all borders but not a single person can be respectably elected world president. UN is by choice of elite and not by votes. Now there is also thinking of election of parliamentarians by lottery like how juries are chosen which is in right direction. If all government personnel had a body cam like police had and a stock index openly rating all their actions and policies with full transparency, then my project is half way towards redundancy. Now all the bad news and facts are already out in today's fast social media and the continuous complaints serve no purpose if people can't rationally sit down and build the system of solutions together instead. It's not knowledge or words we need from every activists of all causes but actions that we can identify out of all the common interest to unify everyone instead of thousands more NGOs that always can't group together and get pathetic results. Unity is strength and it's not invented today. Self-interest is only for those doom to fail.

I liek to use the infamous "I'm not a scientist" on me but I can think outside the box and identify from a third party the solutions easily in each country. like China need more democracy and US need more communisn or even dictatorship to reunify.

Last fact is we can talk about freedom, privacy, human rights, LGBT, abortion, equality, climate etc etc. Billions living under USD2 per day never have luxury to think about all these issues. If someone else really work on the project to unify them and represent them on a platform like FB and give them a USD$30 smartphone (from India) to register under blockchain, give them UBI of $500 monthly, create social business entities, group them together for bigger loans and register offshore to run tax like the rich did legally, easily 50% of all world problems solved in a year!