5 reasons why no country wants to mess with Russia

in politics •  8 years ago  (edited)

Russia's annexation of the tiny eastern european country Crimea (2.7 million people) and the near certainty they played a hand in the MH17 crash are not kind harbingers of the country's future plans. Current sanctions (freezing bank accounts for Russian leaders and travel bans on members of intelligence community) are in place to discourage the Russians from any further nefarious behavior, but for the most part, the buck stops at what many equate to as a slap-on-the-wrist.

Why aren’t more aggressive actions being taken against a country that is engaging in borderline acts of war? 

Here are 5 reasons why nobody wants to mess with Russia.

1) Gas

Russia has the largest reserve of natural gas in the world. 

2) Oil

In case you didn't notice, Russia is a really big freaking country - and it contains a boatload of oil (about the 3rd largest in the world). Over 40% of the oil coming into Europe originates in Russia. Historically, Russia's biggest single handed investor has been Shell.

If Europe wants to go on the attack against their Russian neighbor, it would have to be a multilateral effort across all of its nations, as no country wants to single handedly be squeezed out for biting the hand that feeds them.

If all else fails, there's always Saudi Arabi. They'd be more than happy supplying oil to Europe (most likely only jacking up the price 30% as a premium).

"[Russia] is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neighbours, not out of strength but out of weakness. We [the US] have considerable influence on our neighbours. We generally don’t need to invade them in order to have a strong co-operative relationship with them.” - President Barack Obama


3) Geography

Russia spans across Europe and Asia and has borders that put it within striking distance of every major industry from Syria to China to Japan to Germany. If Russia is a regional power than California is a flyover state...

Size isn't everything, but that's one heck of a no-fly zone, and again, a tremendous amount of resources that one country can tap into. Any form of military attack would need to again be a joint effort most likely between Asia and Europe, which barring something miraculous, would be historically unprecedented.


4) Military

There's some debate to just how mighty the once super-mighty Russian military actually is. Global Fire Power ranks it as the second most powerful nation, behind the United States, and there are several factors they look at in determining this measurement.

Russia has:

  • A population of 46,812,553 that is fit for service (no detailed explanation as to what implies "fit")
  • Roughly a 75,000 person labor force
  • 7 major ports and terminals
  • 1,218 serviceable airports


,,,Now compare this to the United States, which has:

  • A population of 120,022,084 fit for service
  • A 155,000,000 person labor force
  • 24 major ports and terminals
  • 13,513 serviceable airports

Germany is the 6th most powerful country and ranks as follows:

  • Fit for service 29,538,413
  • 710 aircrafts
  • 82 naval carriers
  • 43,920,000 labor force
  • 539 airports
  • 13 major ports and terminals


Despite Russia's "aging" population (more Russian pregnancies end in abortion than live birth) Russia still has an estimated 3,300 nuclear missiles left over from the Cold War days, and its safe to say most of those are pointing towards the U.S. Still, one of Russia's greatest strength is in its Air Force, which is very comparable to the United State's air fleet (albeit the U.S. is believed to be more advanced when it comes to drones…for now).

“Russia is never as strong or as weak as it appears” – Charles Maurice de Talleyrand French Foreign Minister 19th century


5) Keep Your Enemies Closer than your Friends

Okay so what does this mean? Well, the U.S. and Russia have, as far back as 2012, cooperated in military exercises on a WEEKLY basis. The U.S. and Russia carried out global security mission training and simulations side by side. “We did about 50 events. So, a very robust, cooperative effort between our militaries,” said Rear Admiral Mark C. Montgomery.

Could the fact that each side has some understanding of the other's moves play a factor in a possible "attack."

Probably not a chance in hell, as both sides undoubtedly have plenty of tricks up their sleeves...but it's interesting to note, nevertheless.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

War goes now and makes progress on Ukraine, on My Motherland, I consider this war does not need to the people, she needs to Politics, it Political war, but while they decide the questions, every day leaves on the next world not alone...military, there earth is saturated with the Maternal tears.it is sad that alongside above-ground people are at war with each other......

This war is the greatest disaster for us. Yes it's true. Who is guilty? It does not matter already. The people are suffering. It always has been.

Everyone knows who is to blame in this war

Remains only to hope what this nightmare made off !!!!!

We'll hope for the best!

You are too harsh

I believe in the truth

Trump loves Putin..scary

Does a trump go not always, so that it is necessary to be able to be stopped, and Why do People must in their Game to suffer ? Wanted to play would sit down for a table played...but probably not interestingly so, more people are needed in fact so more interesting......

@ukblogger, what do you think of this report about the single move that could make Russia the new world leader > https://steemit.com/steemit/@blockrush/the-single-move-that-could-make-russia-the-new-world-leader-blockrush

To understand the belligerence of today's Russia, it is critical to understand the Crimean War (1853-1856), the event which truly turned the tables for the nation. Up until that time, the tsars had basically continued the imperialist expansion of the Greats (Peter and Catherine), especially at the expense of the Ottoman Empire. But then, right around the 400-year anniversary of the loss of Constantinople (Istanbul) to the Ottomans in 1453, the Russians suffered a humiliating loss when the Ottomans teamed up with practically every Western European power from Great Britain to frickin' Sardinia to kick their butts. The aggression of the Western powers against Russia was always a little (and sometimes more than a little) morally dubious, and the war spurred anti-Western resentment in Russia which endures to this day. Taking the Crimea back is a symbolic point of national pride, in addition to a strategic win.