RE: Can a Christian be an Anarchist Without Rejecting Paul? (Christian Anarchy - Part 5)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Can a Christian be an Anarchist Without Rejecting Paul? (Christian Anarchy - Part 5)

in politics •  8 years ago 

I think there may be some value to what you're saying, but I don't think Paul's message is specific to the church in Rome. What he writes is consistent with the message of other Biblical writers in other contexts.

Thanks for commenting!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I am not saying that it was only relevant to Rome, but I do believe that the context is more relevant than many readers think.
We tend to apply passages universally, unless they seem too extreme, like, "Go, sell everything you have, and give it . . ."
There are themes that run through Pauls writing; I do not see this passage as a principal theme in Paul. I do think that the Roman situation was complicated. The church in Rome seems to have been predominantly Jewish, without Roman citizenship, and as such would have been on shaky ground. I think today we have churches and missionaries in similar situations.
When we live in a foreign country, we respect the government there, but we do not act traitorously with respect to our native country. We tend to forget that our citizenship in the New Jerusalem is the one that counts, and here, whatever nation "here" might be, we are at most resident aliens. As such, we need to live respectfully and keep our noses clean.