Here's the good news: STEEM will be added on Niffler.co.
When I think back, it looks like an epic challenge, although it should have been quite easy to have 1000 people supporting STEEM.
But if I remember correctly, the campaign to support the listing of STEEM on Niffler started a few months ago, not even a few weeks ago. It's true only the start and the end were more visible on the blockchain, from my own subjective observations.
So, why did it take so long? What can we learn from this?
First of all, the elements that might have kept some people away:
- lack of awareness (they didn't know about the campaign or not from enough sources to give it importance - this is where coordinated campaigns have a huge role)
- not clearly understanding the benefits of listing STEEM on Niffler, unlike a regular exchange
- the necessity to create an account on Niffler to support STEEM
Then, why, despite all that, did the campaign finally succeed, in my opinion?
Because it was well-crafted by Niffler and there is a clear measurement of progress. In the process, they get new users (and their emails) and we get the listing if we reach 1000, which we did.
Unlike other campaigns we enter where winners are hand-picked, criteria for selection not known, etc. this one was easy. It is true that the same approach is unlikely to be taken by more desired targets, like Binance or Coinbase.
In all cases though, it's almost always about mutual interest (or interests of third parties).
There you go @SteemAlliance, one more area where you should offer some coordination. On internal awareness campaigns to our users for important matters, like supporting STEEM on the outside. But you probably need to work first on improving the awareness of your own actions, thinking about how few registered as voters in the late elections, before they became open.
Also something for @steem.marketing perhaps, in the future?
I have never heard about Niffler before I saw your post and I count myself as informed about crypto world... So, I suppose that "lack of awareness" was the main reason for taking that long... Also, I didn't know the procedure for voting (it was very unclear how it works at all), but it was automatic at the end..
If we count all that reasons, 1000 votes is a great result!
Go STEEM!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yup, I agree, its highest drawback was the lack of awareness. That's why I believe a better coordination will be useful in the future.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you so much for participating in the Partiko Delegation Plan Round 1! We really appreciate your support! As part of the delegation benefits, we just gave you a 3.00% upvote! Together, let’s change the world!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @gadrian! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
To support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @gadrian!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.666 which ranks you at #5310 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 212 contributions, your post is ranked at #25.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit