![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://www.selfdefensesupply.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/b/w/bw57.jpg)
The reason that reparations were never made to the African American community was largely because the 13th Amendment still allowed for slavery “as a punishment for crime.” The radical republicans had seriously proposed to give freed slaves land and money, but never could get popular support for reparations. By refusing to give reparations—thereby leaving “freed” slaves without money or land with which to make a new beginning—, it left African Americans susceptible to re-enslavement. Former slaves during the Reconstruction era were left with no way to procure food and shelter except to either (1) work for their former masters for starvation-wages or (2) resort to theft and crime. The former slave would either have to go back to his former master and work in his fields, usually receiving less for his labor than he had formerly received under slavery. It was not uncommon for masters to give slaves wages as an allowance, to encourage them to work harder. The slave might now be hired as a "free laborer" for the very same wages he received as a slave, but without the guarantee of food and shelter. If the former slave could not find work, or could not make enough to survive, they could acquire bread by stealing it from someone else. The “freed” slave, immediately after the war and for decades to follow, was often worse off than before. He could turn to a wage-slavery which was sometimes worse than chattel slavery, far worse than what we call “wage-slavery” today, or he could turn to theft. Theft, of course, meant that he could be convicted and legally re-enslaved. If this happened, he could be sent to work on the plantations without pay through convict leasing. And that was the predicament of the African American in the South—that chattel slavery was really not abolished by the 13th Amendment, and legal slavery in the form of convict leasing persisted until about 1930. Free your slaves, give them no food or shelter when you turn them loose, and then re-enslave them when you catch them stealing food. The runaway slave patrols that existed before the “abolition of slavery” turned into police departments. Now, instead of catching runaway slaves and re-enslaving them, they caught former slaves stealing food, got them convicted, and re-enslaved them. The "crimes" used as justification for re-enslaving former slaves were “crimes” necessitated by the poverty resulting from their former status as slaves―having previously been a slave prior to “abolition” suddenly became the reason for one’s re-enslavement. While buying people from prisons to use as slaves is no longer practiced in America (usually), for-profit prisons still make money off of enslaving people; and involuntary labor is still common in the American prison system. Convicts are cleaning up trash on the sides of the roads and helping fight fires in California. American police are still very much runaway slave patrols, capturing people of color to enslave.
“There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.”—Henry Anslinger (commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics/Drug Enforcement Agency, from 1930-1962)
Laws in America unfairly target African Americans. Marijuana was criminalized specifically for the purpose of targeting people of color. Even when the law doesn't specifically target African Americans, black people routinely receive harsher punishments than whites would receive for the same crime. Although usage of marijuana is just as common among whites as among blacks, black people are 4 times more likely to be arrested for possession. More than 4 out of 5 drug-related arrests are for possession rather than selling. The United States Sentencing Commission, a federal agency, reported that from 2007 to 2009 black people, on average, received 13 percent longer sentences for drug convictions than whites, all other things being equal. The statistics from 1998 up to 2006 were comparable to these latest numbers. Mandatory minimum sentencing for drug possession is targeted to punish black people more than whites. Powder cocaine is more common among white people, whereas crack cocaine is more common among blacks—the drugs are the same!—but a person can possess as much as 500 grams of regular cocaine before a mandatory five-year sentence kicks in, whereas as little as 28 grams of crack gets one a mandatory five-year sentence. The only difference between the two drugs, generally speaking, is the color of the skin of the people who use it. 62% of SWAT raids are drug-related, and the majority of those occur in black neighborhoods, in spite of the fact that drug use and distribution are just as common among whites. When marijuana was first criminalized, the explicit reason was to justify imprisoning black people and other minorities. The largest interest groups that lobby against the legalization of marijuana today are the for-profit prison industry and the prison guard unions. The prison-industrial complex has lobbied against marijuana legalization because legalization would mean fewer prisoners. Furthermore, for-profit prisons usually have terms in their contract that require the government to keep the prisons full, otherwise the government must pay a fine. Without marijuana being illegal, prisons would not be filled to capacity, which means the government would have to pay fines to compensate the for-profit prisons. This is why federal law is not likely to change on marijuana any time soon.
“We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”—John Ehrlichman (Richard Nixon’s chief domestic policy adviser from 1969-1973)
Jeff Sessions’ Department of Justice (DoJ) has overturned the hands-off approach of the Obama Administration to enforcement of federal anti-marijuana laws in States that have legalized marijuana. The new DoJ will potentially be allowing the arrest and prosecution of marijuana users and distributors in places where marijuana has been legalized. Additionally, the DEA (under the DoJ) has granted a Schedule II classification to Insys Therapeutics for Dronabinol, synthetic THC. Natural THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, remains Schedule I. Certain forms of synthetic marijuana, however, unlike real marijuana, can be chemically addictive and dangerous. While Insys Therapeutics claims that their synthetic marijuana does not have any significant risk for abuse or addiction, the company also claimed that their opioid fentanyl was not habit forming. Due to the companies fake research and lobbying, their opioid was approved for medical use and actively promoted, leading to an opioid crisis, spike in heroin usage, and spread of HIV. This same company that is now going to have a legal monopoly on medical marijuana has been sued by Arizona, North Carolina, New Jersey, Indiana, Illinois, and other states for its role in causing the opioid crisis. But if the new legal THC happens to be both addictive (we will see) and more expensive due to Insys having a monopoly, then we will see a synthetic marijuana crisis and rise in crime—a crisis that will be used as a justification for “imprisoning” (read as “enslaving”) even more people of color.
The average white person is completely ignorant of the history of slavery and institutional racism in America—racism perpetuated by policing and for-profit prisons—and so cannot even begin to comprehend Black Lives Matter’s push for abolition of policing. Nor can white people, from their position of ignorance, comprehend the prison abolitionist movement. Black people know that prisons are plantations where slaves are forced to work and that police are runaway slave patrols, whereas white people think that all cops are Andy Griffith and that prisons only contain violent criminals.
Again such a interesting topic by @ekklesiagora
I'm realy interesting and respect to ur ideas...
Wel dine and execellent work sir..
Cheers~~~
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As a white person who is fully aware that there are over 2 million slaves in America today, I have to say I find your racist remarks very offensive.
I am not in disagreement that marijuana laws were originally a deliberate means of racial segregation and intent to disenfranchise blacks, nor that laws against heroin and crack were also.
I find it ludicrous that you claim 'white people' don't know that prisons are slavery.
There is a racial divide when it comes to policing - and crime. That doesn't make white people ignorant of it.
I submit that it is YOU that are displaying ignorance with this statement.
I reckon you oughta rephrase that part of your post.
I'm not easily offended, but that's possibly the most blatantly racist thing I've ever read, and it's just plain false.
You are a better writer, and better informed than that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As a white person, when I look at the other white people around me, knowing that 90% of the people in my area voted Trump—and when I talk to them—I cannot help but reach the conclusion that I asserted above. It is not racism, but a fact, that most white people in America are ignorant when it comes to history and to racial justice issues. When I talk to the average white person, who is pro-cop, pro-prisons, and anti-BLM, I find that they don't have a bit of sympathy with Black Lives Matter, anti-police sentiment, or prison abolitionist ideas. It's not that they have an intellectual disagreement with ideas of social justice, but rather that they cannot even comprehend where black people and social justice advocates are coming from. They don't have the slightest idea what the other side believes or why they believe it. They don't know the history of policing, the history of convict leasing, racist history of the war on drugs, etc. They are, as I said, ignorant of these issues. The alternative to them being ignorant is that they are all wretchedly immoral people who know the facts but cling to bigotry anyways. As someone who originally came from an Austro-libertarian leaning conservative position, and dabbled in circles that eventually morphed into the Alt-Right, I know I speak for myself when I say that my lack of support for racial justice issues was largely due to ignorance rather than mal-intent. The fact is that racial justice issues are not talked about in schools, probably not 1 in 100 white people in America have heard of convict leasing, and most probably don't know that racism is why pot is illegal, and white people generally do not attempt to educate themselves on such matters, because it really doesn't affect them so they don't care about it. And I recognize that you, as an individual white person, may not fall into the group I described, but that doesn't make my assessment wrong: I did not say all white people, I said the average white person, which I think is fairly accurate.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
While you did once say 'the average white...', you subsequently said 'white people', which is all of them.
My point is that it isn't 'white' people that are ignorant, but people. How informed are you regarding slavery in Asia? The selling of white captives by Cossacks to the Ottoman Empire? Each culture has it's own memes which are perpetuated outside the indoctrination imposed by official schooling, and no culture has any basis to claim some overarching possession of truth.
It is your use of race itself that invalidates your thesis in this post. While your own journey of discovery of facts outside your cultural milieu and official indoctrination has alerted you to the shortcomings of your people's culture, is leaves you blind to the equivalent shortcomings of all cultures.
Ignorance is not racially dependent, and characterizing a particular race as particularly ignorant is nothing more than racism.
Edit: given that despite the racial disparity of imprisonment most prisoners in America are actually white, and that for the last 5 decades prison populations have exploded, I reckon more than 1% of white Americans have actually experienced slavery and your contention that fewer than that are even aware of it is utterly insuperable.
It's nothing more than racist propaganda.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"you subsequently said 'white people', which is all of them."
No, because that's not the way people use language. If I say that humans see in color, I'm not meaning to imply that there are no blind or colorblind people, only that humans generally see in color.
When I single out white people, as the group that is ignorant in this regard, I do so because it is white people who are generally working in opposition to racial justice issues. They are the ones that need to be educated about it. Black people are far more likely to be aware of these matters because these are things that are talked about in black communities, by black activists.
"It is your use of race itself that invalidates your thesis"
I disagree. If I had left out race, it would have invalidated my thesis. You can't talk about the problem of white supremacy without talking about whiteness.
"Ignorance is not racially dependent, and characterizing a particular race as particularly ignorant is nothing more than racism."
That's not what I said. You are mis-reading what I said. I did not say that white people are more ignorant than other races in abstracto. Ignorance means "not knowing." I said, regarding a very particular set of issues, that white people are generally ignorant. I did not imply that they are more ignorant than other people, but merely that their opposition to Black Lives Matter and racial justice movements is based in said ignorance, and implied that white people need to be educated on those issues. For me to say this is not in any way racist. If I make the assertion that the indigenous people of Peru are generally ignorant of particle physics, that isn't racist. That's no more racist than saying that lung cancer is more common among white people than among blacks.
"more than 1% of white Americans have actually experienced slavery and your contention that fewer than that are even aware of it is utterly insuperable."
Again, I was only talking about the average white person, who has not been to prison, and who thinks that only "bad people" get sent to prison. My assertion still stands, even if 40% of the white population is totally "woke". The average white person doesn't know the history of for-profit prisons leasing out convicts as a way to re-enslave black people, nor that many Southern police departments started as runaway slave patrols.
This isn't "racist propaganda." This is anti-racist propaganda.
This sort of reaction is kind of the problem. A lot of white people are so sensitive about the issue that you can't really talk about racism without offending them, which is why BLM, kneeling football players, and everything else is vilified. You can't state an opinion about these issues because it might offend white people. You can't peacefully protest because it might offend white people. In fact, the only thing you can do is elect a racist President because that's the only thing that doesn't offend white people...because actual racism doesn't usually offend most white people, whereas speaking out against racism does offend them and makes you "racist" in their estimation.
I'm sorry if what I have said offends you, but that's my opinion. Perhaps we can agree to disagree, but I really don't think that I'm wrong.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No. You can't single out one race as racist. You single out white people as racist.
I am not a racist. I have been targeted by racists, for example during the LA riots, I was driving near my home when a mob shouting slurs like 'Kill Whitey' threatened to run amok.
I find your remarks facile, vapid, and racist.
If you dared to talk about another race in that way, twitter, facebook, and google would all censor you.
Enjoy your echo chamber.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit