Red October? You decide! Remember the Perkins and Coie law firm that paid for the Fake Dossier? Durham's First Indictment? Was a deal struck for Sussman to not receive multiple charges? Did you notice Lynch wrote the Reuters Article?

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.40.40 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.47.52 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.48.08 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.48.45 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.48.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.49.31 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.49.49 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.52.00 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.54.06 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.55.00 PM.png

Is this the First Shot taken by Durham as he stated on his telegram recently. . .

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 11.47.38 PM.png

See Facebook Post link here,
https://www.facebook.com/melissa.mcgarity.14/posts/10224562653988339

Last post

Screen Shot 2021-09-23 at 12.05.56 AM.png
No Shocker Here right?

Screen Shot 2021-09-23 at 12.06.41 AM.png

I've got one archived here,

WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT! ODE TO CABAL AND THEIR FOLLOWERS! WE WILL PREVAIL!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/RNPJKQsQ5CPX/

According to The Hill on Sept. 16, 2021

A federal grand jury on Thursday indicted attorney Michael Sussman on a charge of lying to the FBI during the 2016 campaign, marking the second prosecution brought by John Durham, the special counsel tapped by former President Trump to investigate the FBI's probe into Russian interference.

The indictment alleges that Sussman, an attorney at the firm Perkins Coie with ties to the Democratic Party, misrepresented who he was working for when he presented evidence to the FBI in 2016 of a link between the Trump Organization and the Russian financial company Alfa Bank.

Prosecutors in Durham's office say that Sussman falsely claimed to investigators at the time that he was not acting on behalf of any client when he had actually been representing Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and an unnamed tech executive.

ADVERTISEMENT
"Sussman's false statement misled the FBI General Counsel and other FBI personnel concerning the political nature of his work and deprived the FBI of information that might have permitted it more fully to assess and uncover the origins of the relevant data and technical analysis, including the identities and motivations of Sussman's clients," the indictment reads.

The FBI investigated the allegations and determined that there was insufficient evidence to link Trump's business with Alfa Bank, and the former special counsel Robert Mueller did not address the issue in the report on his investigation.

According to the indictment, the unnamed tech executive provided nonpublic data obtained from internet companies as evidence to present to the FBI's top lawyer. Prosecutors also allege that the Clinton campaign had hired Sussman to find links between Trump and Russia.

Sussman has denied working for the Clinton campaign and told congressional investigators in 2017 that he was representing an unnamed cybersecurity researcher in the meeting with the FBI.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/572662-grand-jury-indicts-attorney-on-charge-of-lying-to-fbi-in-durham

Did Sussman make a deal?
Did he give Durham information so he would not receive multiple charges?
You decide!

If so, does it make others want to cut a deal?

Will there be additional indictments served?

The material Sussman was charged with using was for a researching program at a university and was never intended to be used the way it was used. . .for data mining.

It was misused as classified materials and there are laws that protect against people having their data exposed in this manner.
It was exposed unlawfully.

Will this cause RED across the board in the