Politics & Religion, two subjects that we are told never to discuss in polite company. In an attempt to explain myself, I am going to broach the latter subject, which unfortunately has caused a few friends & even family stop speaking to me. Religion is a tricky subject. People tend to get emotional when one doesnโt conform to their beliefs yet get just as upset if someone expects them to conform. Iโve seen seen any value in getting angry or hating someone because of what they believe (or donโt believe). I find social bonds & friendships more fulfilling when you value who a person is, as a whole, rather than what โtribeโ they claim. Nevertheless, Iโve lost relationships because people discovered I didnโt follow their doctrine.
I donโt really like using labels because they tend to force people into a box but if I have to give myself one I would say Iโm agnostic. Though, I didnโt start life out that way. My Father is Catholic & my Mother Pentecostal, so I was baptized (christened) Catholic. In elementary I attended catholic school, went to Sunday school, & was even an alter boy. These are what I refer to as the โindoctrination yearsโ in ones life. Itโs the learning of what ones โtribeโ expects you to believe before one has the mental fortitude to question those beliefs. For me, the acceptance of this biblical explanation & dogma was not easy and frequently impossible. My curiosity would force me to ask questions. Questions I didnโt know were not supposed to be asked. Questions like โWhat did the animals on the ark eat since animals eat other animals?โ, โDid no one else know how to build boats?โ & โWhere did Caine & Sethโs wives come from?โ. After getting punished by nuns & my parents I learned to keep my inquiries to myself. Though I would leave catholic school after 3rd grade, I mindlessly claimed Catholicism as my religion up until my teenage years.
Maybe it was because my parents had strayed from the rigidity of weekly service or maybe because my mothers side of the family was Pentecostal, whatever the reason in my teenage years I was never prohibited from attending churches of different faiths. These years are what I would come to call my (first) โCrisis-of-faithโ. I had a nagging in the back of my mind for answers. Answers my current proclaimed faith wasnโt providing. Unfortunately, attending services wouldnโt provide answers either. Each service was little more than a summation of a passage or few. A parable & the faiths interpretation of it. This didnโt go deep enough for me. I decided a better course of action would be going to the source material myself with no preconceived notions. To this day I donโt know any Christians who have read the entire bible, cover to cover. I did it twice. I wrote annotations in the margins that referred to a folder of my own notes. I would go into deep though about sections attempting to make sense out of contradictions. I would read other books that attempted to explain some of these. All of this got me absolutely no where so I went even deeper. Researching Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, ect. I also dove into historical religions such as Greek Gods, Norse Mythology, Zoroastrianism, Paganism, ect. I learned a lot but nothing provided answers. Desperate & exhausted, I conceded that I would stay catholic & moved on.
A few years later I got back involved with my love of science & more specifically physics, astronomy, & cosmology. It was during this time I developed great reverence for something Iโve long known to be exceptional, the Scientific Method. When applied properly the scientific method uncovers empirical facts & truths about the nature of reality, nature, the universe, & more. Itโs a flaw correcting path toward enlightenment. It was during this scientific journey that I faced my (second) โCrisis-of-Faithโ.
A modern misconception, science is not inherently opposed to religion. The conflict arises when occasionally science uncovers truths that dispel a part of religious dogma. This happened with Copernicusโ & Galileoโs Heliocentric model. It happened with the mounting evidence that the earth is older than 6000 years old. It happened when Edwin Hubble uncovered evidence that led Catholic Priest Georges Lemaรฎtre to form his โBig Bang Theoryโ. Compelling as they are, this is not what turned me away from religion.
My awakening was caused by something every scientist knows & everyone should practice, objectivity. Quite simply, I do not have enough evidence to say with certainty weather or not a deity exists. Itโs the same reason Iโm not an atheist. Yes, itโs ok to form a hypothesis based on the information at hand but one should try to stay objective until one has the answer. For me, science provided more answers than anything else. You could say science filled the void of faith for me.
Religion can be helpful & good but frequently itโs used as a way to teach people (questionable) morality & provide a figurative carrot & stick for obedience. I donโt murder, steal, & rape because itโs wrong not because a book or priest told me to. If, rather than prepare our entire existence for an afterlife, we focused on the here & now, we could make our own Heaven on Earth.
Posted using Partiko iOS
First, this is a great piece. I also do not follow blindly the words that are written by "man". In my case however this doesn't only include our preformed notions of religion, as I also consider our modern science as no more then the newest religion we are being taught. Now, don't get me wrong, I love science and it's ability to teach us. However, I also know that a lot of "science" is still just theories.(like and especially gravity.) Of my questions I have concerning science, one of the biggest is this.... If we live in a positive pressure system(our atmosphere, with it's gasses), and space is an absolute vacuum...what prevents our positive pressure atmosphere from escaping into the vacuum? The laws of physics(given by scientists) state that gasses will ALWAYS migrate from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In my experience and according to scientific law, if a gas is to be contained under pressure...you must have a sealed system. Our atmosphere is the only example I have ever found that disobeys this scientific law. And on the reverse side...what stops spaces' perfect vacuum from encompassing us? And just one more thing that blows my scientific mind....Water never conforms to(and sticks) to the outside surface of any container.(it must be held on the "inside" of a bowl or cup to not lose or spill it.) However, Earth holds all it's water on the outside?? And we are going through space at 100s of millions of miles per hour?!? To me, it just sounds like more of man making up stories to keep us busy from finding out humanities true values, meanings, and purpose. Dear brother, i hope you have an awesome day. And thank you so much for sharing your views with us and allowing us so much insight into your life and your beliefs. I send my best loving vibrations your way and hope you the best.๐ค
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the compliment on the piece. One of the biggest problems that most of us get hung up on is the term โ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ณ๐บโ. In lay terms โ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ณ๐บโ means exactly what we all think, a system of ideas intended to explain something. Basically, itโs best guess. In science that is called a hypothesis. Scientific theory is a little different. A popular reference website defines it pretty well:
A Scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.
A good example would be the theory that if I hold my hand on a hot stove top it will hurt. As many times as I do this it will always be a theory. It can never become scientific โ๐๐ข๐ธโ because they arenโt the same thing. A law is a description of an observed phenomena. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it, nor is it intended to. Itโs sometimes helpful to think of Newtons Three Laws Of Motion. They all describe observed actions & reactions of something in our reality yet they never seek to explain why they do what they do. Another is his Law of Gravity (Lแดแดก Oา Uษดษชแด แดสsแดส Gสแดแด ษชแดแดแดษชแดษด), which states that:
โแดแด แดสส แดแดสแดษชแดสแด ษชษด แดสแด แดษดษชแด แดสsแด แดแดแดสแดแดแดs แดแด แดสส แดแดสแดส แดแดสแดษชแดสแด แดกษชแดส แด าแดสแดแด แดสแดษดษข แด สษชษดแด แดแดษชษดษชษดษข แดสแดแด. Tสแด าแดสแดแด ษชs แด ษชสแดแดแดสส แดสแดแดแดสแดษชแดษดแดส แดแด แดสแด แดสแดแด แดแดแด แดา แดสแดษชส แดแดssแดs แดษดแด ษชษดแด แดสsแดสส แดสแดแดแดสแดษชแดษดแดส แดแด แดสแด sวซแดแดสแด แดา แดสแด แด ษชsแดแดษดแดแด สแดแดแดกแดแดษด แดสแดแด.โ
Though it seems complex he was simply stating very technically the observable actions when an apple falls to earth. Newton had no clue why or what caused any of this happened. It would take 150+ years & the brilliant Albert Einstein to solve that riddle.
This terminology being misunderstood has become so frustrating for scientists that some want to do away with these words altogether. Weโre already seeing โ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ญโ replace โ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ณ๐บโ in some cases.
This is not to say that theories canโt be wrong because they absolutely can. To me, thatโs the beauty in science. This is a failsafe built into the Scientific Method. The answer or explanation for something can always be modified, expanded, simplified, or even retracted when we are presented with new evidence. Frankly, it just means keeping an open mind. I think humanity would be better off if we treated all subjects & each other like this.
Now, on to your questions. You are correct, we live in a positive pressure atmosphere & space is a vacuum. Common sense tells us that the atmosphere should evaporate. However when you consider everything at play in this system it becomes clearer. First, what makes the atmosphere positive pressure? After all, there are gas clouds in space & they arenโt positive pressure bubbles floating along. Quite simply, the positive pressure is the weight of those gases exerting force downward toward the earth. Itโs the reason the atmosphere gets thinner & thereโs less oxygen the higher you go. Atmosphere is constantly pushing down on us but what causes this? Itโs one of the strangest forces in the universe, Gravity. That atmosphere is made up of gases & gases are made of atoms like everything else. Even though itโs minuscule, those atoms have mass. Gravity pulls on them the same way it does you or me. Itโs part of the reason Marsโ atmosphere is 1/1000th that of earths, Mars is around half Earths size. Jupiter is so Massive that pressures are thought to be able to crush carbon clouds into diamond rain. Particles of light, called Photons, are particles with absolutely zero mass yet strong enough gravity still can act on them. Gravity seems a simple notion but itโs actually very complex. Different aspects of it confounded Newton, Einstein, & Hawking.
This is one of my favorite subjects & enjoy discussion with other curious individuals. Though I can go on about it ad nauseam. I really hope this helped to clarify. Have a great day.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Awesome response. And thank you for it. I think we may have to agree to disagree.๐ For when an apple is loosed from a tree, i observe an object that is denser then it's surroundings(atmosphere) that falls through said surroundings until it meets an object of similar or greater density(ground). Just as i observe a gravity so weak it cannot stop smoke or water vapor from rising. Yet, it was explained to me that it is what pulls the rain to the ground from the clouds.(once the droplet are big enough.) Once again density seems to be an explanation that seems more plausible. As the water vapor is less dense then the surrounding atmosphere, it rises. Then once it joins back together in the form of clouds, it becomes denser then it's surroundings, and falls.
Density/buoyancy rules my observations but feel free at a rebuttal should you wish. I do have to say, I absolutely enjoy talking to you. Glad I found you dear friend.(And I've lost friends and loved ones because of my beliefs(or lack there of) so I'm right there with you.) ๐ Keep up with engagement like this and you'll be huge in no time.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you so much for being an awesome Partiko user! You have received a 0.64% upvote from us for your 130 Partiko Points! Together, let's change the world!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @erixink! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit