Apparently the San Francisco branch the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) has recently been ordered by the city to stop using a robot to patrol the sidewalks outside its office.
The robot, produced by Silicon Valley startup Knightscope, was used to ensure that homeless people didn’t set up camps outside of the nonprofit’s office. It autonomously patrols a set area using a combination of Lidar and other sensors, and can alert security services of potentially criminal activity.
So lets get this straight... It was used to keep homeless from setting up camps outside its office? If I didn't know better I would say that this is harassment of the homeless plain and simple. Of course nobody wants camps of homeless people ruining the overall appearance of the neighborhood but lets look at the root of the problem. Isn't it the fact that there are so many homeless in the city? What is being done to correct the core problem here?
These robots have had a string of mishaps in the past. One fell into a pond in Washington, DC, in July. Another ran over a child’s foot in California in 2016. And Uber, which is no stranger to the ethical quandaries of what it means to be gainfully employed by a company, has used the robots in San Francisco.
At bare minimum the robots are marginally helpful but running over people's feet and diving into ponds doesn't sound very promising. Of course this technology is just starting to be released and development in this industry is happening at an extremely rapid pace.
According to Popular Science, Knightscope’s business model, is renting robots to customers for $7 an hour, which is about $3 less than minimum wage in California. The company has apparently raised over $15 million from thousands of small investors.
In a particularly dystopian move, it seems that the San Francisco SPCA adorned the robot it was renting with stickers of cute kittens and puppies, according to Business Insider, as it was used to shoo away the homeless from near its office.
This is one of the biggest scandals of December 2017 certainly! There is certainly some possibility that this story has seen a bit of exageration but with all the problems homeless people face do they really need to fend away robots as well?
San Francisco recently voted to cut down on the number of robots that roam the streets of the city, which has seen an influx of small delivery robots in recent years. The city said it would issue the SPCA a fine of $1,000 per day for illegally operating on a public right-of-way if it continued to use the security robot outside its premises, the San Francisco Business Times said.
I believe this was the right move by San Francisco and there is certainly going to be some fallout for the SPCA. At bare minimum they've hurt the odds of some of their K9 and feline friends who may not be adopted before being put to sleep because of a change in public sentiment to the organization.
What do you guys think of this? Does it seem like a dire message to be aware of the coming technocracy steadily gaining ground in our world?
Thanks for dropping by!
Source:
Robots are being used to shoo away homeless people in San Francisco - Quartz
Image Source:
Quartz
The last time I checked, humans are animals.
Very smart and advanced animals, but still animals.
Headline should have been "SPCA uses robot to drive off animals".
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The company has answered via Twitter
https://twitter.com/iKnightscope/status/940738572323233793
In all truth, it really seems to me that homeless and robots is the perfect storm for sensationalized news.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yah, possibly but it certainly is true and puts a real bad stigma on the SPCA... Aren't we all animals?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Plus, the robot is harmless. It doesn't have weapons or similar mechanisms. It only patrols and detects criminal activity. All action is on humans that act upon the information given by the robot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well... I haven't seen the types of methods this robot uses and you could be completely right. But if it has an alarm or other annoying devices it could still be considered harassment.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My head hurts after reading this. Especially that part about cute kitten and puppy stickers. How big is that thing to be running over a child's foot? Looking at the scale of that picture, assuming there was a car in the parking spot, it would probably scare they crap out of me if I saw that thing at night.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Does this count as fake news?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Unfortunately growth in morality isn't as fast as growth in technology.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
OMG he look like star wars
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
he look like R2D2 from star wars
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit