IMPRISON THE CLINTONS!...AND A FEW MORE TRAITORS!

in rosatom •  6 years ago 

Why? Because Rosatom owns 100% of the Willow Creek Uranium Mine in Wyoming. Clinton, Obama, and a long list of others, including Jeff Sessions signed off on the deal that allowed Rosatom to acquire 50.42% of Uranium One in 2010, at the same time that Judge Kimba Wood was quietly deporting Russian spies, Skripal and Chapman. Now, if Russia is the enemy today and was the enemy throughout the Cold War and was behaving like an enemy in 2010, wouldn't you say that the sale of American soil and American uranium mining rights is AIDING AND ABETTING THE ENEMY? That alone is grounds for TREASON, but they did it again in 2013, allowing Rosatom to buy out Uranium One. How do you feel knowing that Russia, that election-meddling enemy state, has a Wyoming homestead and uranium? Worried about ELECTION MEDDLING? How would you like one of those imported Russian Club-K missiles up your ***?

Rosatom Uranium One History
http://www.uranium1.com/about-us/#history

Moscow's American uranium
By MATT BAKER 10/18/2013 05:08 AM EDT
Rosatom’s nuclear projects also include ventures with China and Venezuela, two countries with less-than-friendly relations with the United States. Russian news agencies also quoted Syrian president Bashar al-Assad in May 2010 as saying that he discussed with then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev the possibility of building nuclear power plants in Syria.

To put it mildly, with a client roster like this, questions abound regarding Rosatom’s acquisition of Uranium One. When Rosatom acquired its first controlling shares in 2010, the deal came under congressional fire. Representatives Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla), Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.), Peter King (R-N.Y.), and Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) penned a letter to then-Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner warning that “signing over control of this U.S. uranium processing facility to the Russian government unnecessarily jeopardizes U.S. security interests.”

In the end, however, the sale of the initial majority stake in Uranium One was approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS) and the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC’s only caveat was to bar Uranium One from exporting any of the produced material without prior approval.
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/moscows-american-uranium-098472

Kimba Wood and Russian Spies
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/who-is-kimba-wood-the-judge-presiding-over-the-michael-cohen-case/

Kimba Wood and Russian Spies
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-10-russian-spies-arrested-in-us/

880214871225757696.jpg

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
https://nuclear-news.net/2013/10/18/russias-control-over-american-uranium-sites/

@anyx Take note, your down-voting bot has pasted a URL to Nuclear-News' copy/paste of the ORIGINAL Politico article that I cited. Take my name off your CHEATER list. Consider putting Cheetah's name on it.

Cheetah Report for 2018.08.25
https://steemit.com/cheetah/@cheetah/2018-08-25

I'm expecting your down-voting bot to flag this comment for the rest of this post, which I've posted elsewhere.

Fair Use Rules
Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. Section 107 calls for consideration of the following four factors in evaluating a question of fair use:

Read this, paying attention to Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work and note the source.
https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html

How much of someone else's work can I use without getting permission?
Under the fair use doctrine of the U.S. copyright statute, it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports. There are no legal rules permitting the use of a specific number of words, a certain number of musical notes, or percentage of a work. Whether a particular use qualifies as fair use depends on all the circumstances. See, Fair Use Index, and Circular 21, Reproductions of Copyrighted Works by Educators and Librarians.
https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-fairuse.html

Legal Guide for Bloggers from the Electronic Frontier Foundation
Freedom of speech is the foundation of a functioning democracy, and Internet bullies shouldn't use the law to stifle legitimate free expression. That's why EFF created this guide, compiling a number of FAQs designed to help you understand your rights and, if necessary, defend your freedom.
https://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal

About EFF
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading nonprofit organization defending civil liberties in the digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. We work to ensure that rights and freedoms are enhanced and protected as our use of technology grows.
https://www.eff.org/about