The Satoshi Revolution: Chapter 3: Civil Liberties and Central Banks {Part 3}

Satoshi Revolution: A Revolution of the Rising Expectations
Section 1: Trusted Third Party Issue
Chapter 3: Trying to Undo Satoshi
By Wendy McLoyey

Bad News: Civil Liberties and Central Bank (Chapter 3, Part 3)

If you know the enemy and know yourself, then you do not have to fear the consequences of hundred wars. If you know yourself but not the enemy, to win every victory, you will have to suffer a loss even if you do know neither enemy nor you; you will die in every battle.
Sun Tsu, the Art of War
This government is making its own crypto counter through the central banking system, to understand the consequences of free-market cryptocurrency, the understanding of relations between the governments and the central banks needs to be understood.
Background Reference
This is a central bank a clearing house for national currency; it is a middleman for a country's financial policies. It enjoys monopoly control over the country's money and debt production and distribution. Generally, it also rejects monetary policy through mechanism, such as setting the interest rates, and it is a member bank's policies.
It even when a central bank is nominally independent, as in the U.S. The Federal Reserve System is called, it relies entirely on the government for legal privileges, which empowers it and defines it. Nevertheless, people insist that two institutions are independent. This illusion works at the expense of the average people for the purposes of the government and the banks.
This case against the Fed is with Murray Roth bard’s attack on the Federal Reserve, he made it clear that "independent of politics" has a good, good ring, "there are two problems with the claim. First of all, this is a cleaning hand Second, Much of the Fed's autonomy is actually a government subsidiary of the defense that does not preserve monetary integrity, but it is a threat.
To focus on the second point: the Fed is running with much independence is desirable, Roth bard said "private or market, activities [who] should be free from government control, and 'independent of politics' is." It is completely different; however, it is to say that "the government should be independent from politics". Private sector is accountable to customers, competition, stockholders and other market forces. Generally a government agency is responsible for Jan mat and Congress. But an autonomous government agency loses all such responsibilities and acts as a wicked person.
Roth bard continues:
If this government becomes "independent from politics", it can mean that the government's field becomes a full self-sufficient minority, is not accountable to anyone and ever changing the public's personnel or "rascals out" The ability to throw is not subject to ". If a person or group, whether shareholder or voter, can displace a ruling elite, then such elites are more likely to be more dictatorial than the democratic country. And yet it is curious to know how many "self-proclaimed champions of democracy", whether domestic or global, to defend the alleged ideals of total freedom of the Federal Reserve, early on.
These governments protect the dependents between themselves because the Fed benefits the political structure on bipartisan basis. Central Banking System is a vehicle of financing for monetary control and power, especially grant, according to an article in the Financial Times, August 15, 2017, "The leading central bank is now a fifth of the total debt of its governments.” Six major central banks have worked on quantitative easing over the past decade - with the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, and the Bank of England, along with Swiss and Swedish central banks, along with IMF's FT and central bank According to the analysis of the data, now property worth more than $ 15, more than four times pre-crisis levels "This is a startling amount
[Note: When a central bank buys securities for reducing interest rates and increasing currency supply, it is usually quantitative easing for governmental people. It fuels the economy by driving down the cost of borrowing for artificially domestic and occupations.]

History text

These governments and central banks are not independent, the illusion between them is inherent and intimate, not casual, as the history reveals Swedish Rexbank is widely regarded as the central bank first. Opened in 1668, Rickshawk was technically a private, joint stock bank, but it worked under strict royal authority; Raja made the rules of operation mandatory and appointed the management of the bank. The entire purpose of Rickshawk was to lend money to the government and there was a clearing house for commerce.

It was made in 1694 by the governor of the Bank of England and the company Royal Charter. This is the model on which the most modern central banks attract. The Bank of England emerged because King William III's credit was Derek. The joint stock company provided a route for King to copy in public funds, which allowed him to wage war. In the military barriers with William III, Ireland, Scotland and North America, which were at different stages of the rebellion, more importantly, the nine-year war with France (1688-1697) devastated the English navy. But no financial institution would give it the risk of 1.2 MB exposure required for reconstruction.

Accordingly, its English law established the king with artificial incentives for money. Those who joined the Bank of England as joint owners, in return, the King gave in cold cash, in exchange for which he got exclusive access to government financing. The bank became the sole limited-liability corporation, which allowed the issuance of bank notes, which he used to use government bonds as collateral. In other words, the Bank of England increased credit to one recipient and no one would touch it; this acquisition of bonds by the King; On the basis of the bond, the bank issued the money again, which was borrowed again. Without legal prerogative, the central bank has not attracted any investor or finance, with legal privilege, £ 1.2m was raised in less than two weeks.

The government and the central bank are washing hands with each other.

On Civil Liberties and Central Banks

These financial benefits are not the only purpose for the flock of people towards the trusted third party of central banks. The hunger also for power is the biggest stoppage of the powers of the war government, through which the governments maintain it, expand them and expand the need for money for the war - there is a lot more to it - the question is How to get enough

There is a lot of the economy that can be robbed of the economy, but it means that looting individuals who object sometimes, they do dramatically objects, such as with Magnen Carta in 1215 A contemporary commentator had publicly warned King Raj Coyli, "With the opportunities of their wars they kept them [people and nobles] with taxes and bare bones." John was forced to sign the Magna Carta, possibly in danger of death. They promised to skip the economy to pay their wars

When a government declares war, it does at least three fronts: Opposition government, anti-national people, and dissatisfied in their own area. Some are agitating on the dissatisfied principle, but those who attacked them against violations of taxes and other civil liberties have increased their ranks. For the government, the hard question is that without any backlash, we have to get as much money as possible. How to remove people's tendency to emphasize and oppose their civil liberties?

This is a short-term aspect of central banks and currency manipulation, their impact on civil liberties. Direct tax, seizure, and rules are visible. People think of a hand that straightens into their pockets or throw them in jail to refuse to pay the "war" portion of their taxes; they will disobey, on the contrary, confusing monetary policies at the level of non-transparent bureaucracy are invisible. For example, people understand the effect of quantitative easing or do not feel immediately. It does not indicate to take them on the streets with signals of signals; instead, people go about their daily lives and simply consider the burden of indirect taxes which they do not quite understand.

To do this again through the parallel point: Inflation is a hidden tax that people tolerate, though they will rebel against one directly; Inflation is relatively overlooked and is not understood. Equally, those who oppose the protest of pro-war, they tolerate central bank policies, without which it would be impossible to trick the war. Those who are anti-war must call them first and foremost, for the dissolution of the Federal Reserve and all other central banks. But the role of central banks in the financing war is ignored and therefore, the government eliminates the need to face anti-war activists. People do not claim their civil rights because they do not know that those rights are being violated. The role of central banks in social control is unaware.

Conclusion

These average people can not suffer from the partnership of government and central banks. That is, they could not survive before the advent of bittoine. Unfortunately, the government has now become aware of the danger that cryptrocrackmark is in its financial and social control. It is changing the timing mechanism of monetary control: Central Bank.Itr and Central Bank will try to do this, which has been working for centuries: Monopoly of production and distribution of currency.

This process starts with a central bank issuing a crypto government. it has begun

PLEASE READ OF THE POST FROM SOURCE: - https://news.bitcoin.com/the-satoshi-revolution-chapter-3-civil-liberties-and-central-banks-part-3/?utm_source=OneSignal%20Push&utm_medium=notification&utm_campaign=Push%20Notifications