RE: The Simulation Argument

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The Simulation Argument

in science •  7 years ago 

The computer together with the embedded simulator program this very difficult. Besides it does not solve the question which computer and simulator it took to create a computer and a simulator for creating our universe. To tell every individual object in our universe what to do will require a massive amount of administration. We would have a problem. Proceeding from what has been said and using Occam's razor, we can make an experiment and load into an ordinary classical computer the equation of three-dimensional oscillations of a pair of points belonging to string pairs (string theory), and as a result we have dynamics of the projections of elementary particles on the spherical surface. Thus, two one-dimensional strings can generate the entire zoo of the Standard Model's particles. Since in this case we are dealing with a known coherent law of evolution, and the emerging spherical screen - the scene or surface on which we observe the dynamics of particle projections, it is not difficult to conclude that the Holographic Principle is working. Thus, the foundation of the universe can be the result of oscillations of a pair of one-dimensional strings or one closed string, which is very effective. As a result, the universe is a bloating "rubber" sphere -holographic screen, and it's an all that is - says L. Susskind.

Мое видео.gif

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!